Tag Archives: soft bigotry of low expectation

Bill Maher, House Ginger

HOUSE GINGER.png

I have lost all respect for Bill Maher.  For decades telling an N-word joke that made black people laugh has been the Holy Grail of stand up comedy.  If you did that you had bridged the gap.  You were accepted as one of them.  I remember when I was doing stand up comedy only black men would laugh at my jokes while white women shook their heads in disgust.  I thought Bill Maher’s joke was funny.  The only thing that offended me was his apology. 

If you watch the show observe how many times Bill Maher angrily bangs his hands together.  If you know my background in profiling, security, and psychology this body language is correlated with a person who is about to fight.  While he is angry at himself he is projecting his frustration onto Donald Trump.  Narcissistically, Bill Maher conceives of himself as the front line in the assault on the President.  If I were him, in my defense, I would have said, “I thought black people would think of me as one of themselves when I told that joke.” 

It was Bill Maher who I first heard use the term, “the soft bigotry of low expectation”.  Meaning: those people can never get on our level because they are two inferior so they have to be held to a lower standard.  They aren’t like us.  They will never be like us.  

What I find repulsive is the fact that Bill Maher has buckled and bowed down to the false god of Political Correctness.  He looked genuinely distraught and he even brought two other cronies on his show to kick his own ass, a phony Christian, Michael Eric Dyson who I assume was named after the excellent vacuum and a mediocre rapper whom I have never wanted to imitate at karaoke, Ice Cube. 

It was offensive to real black people and every reasonable human being to hear Michael Eric Dyson talk seriously about reparations.  Show me anywhere in the world wear black people have a better life than in the United States.  I don’t agree with slavery.  But Modern black people are not THOSE people and I am not a slave owner.  This is not that point in time. 

Ice Cube looked like a sad, angry, little man.  Frankly, he looked like an angry diabetic who is suffering from heart failure.  Did you see how weak his shoulders looked?  As good as his life has been you’d think he would be more grateful.  Pathetic, impotent, little man, still acting hard.  So, sad. 

One last thing, white people didn’t name Niger or Nigeria.  This stupid fallacy has been promoted by Bill Maher and Jon Stewart.  It is a stupid and evil argument.  

The name Nigeria was taken from the Niger River running through the country. This name was coined in the late 19th century by British journalist Flora Shaw, who later married Lord Lugard, a British colonial administrator. The origin of the name Niger, which originally applied only to the middle reaches of the Niger River, is uncertain. The word is likely an alteration of the Tuareg name egerew n-igerewen used by inhabitants along the middle reaches of the river around Timbuktu prior to 19th-century European colonialism.[27][28]  (SOURCE)

Negus (Ge’ez: ነጉሥ?, nəgūś IPA: [nɨguːɬ]; Amharic: nigūs?; cf. Tigrinya: ነጋሲ? negus) is a royal title in the Ethiopian Semitic languages.[1] It denotes a monarch,[2] such as the Bahri Negus (Lord of the Seas) of the Medri Bahri kingdom in pre-1890 Eritrea, and the Negus in pre-1974 Ethiopia(SOURCE)

 

Double Standards & Donald Trump

yellow.png

In the above video you see an incident in which Bill Maher physically kicks a protestor out of his audience.  His Liberal Progressive audience applauds enthusiastically.  Bill Maher actually brags about this incident and has the footage used to advertise his show.

Now lets switch gears to Donald Trump and the current controversies and compare the bias and accusations.  Trumps audience members, Secret Service, and Security have thrown out audience members or in some instances attacked other audience members.  Bill Maher has a few hundred people in his audience, Donald Trump has tens of thousands of people at his rallies.

While Bill Maher personally silences protestors, Donald Trump does not personally do so.  While Donald Trump gets constant threats on his life Bill Maher doesn’t suffer the same situation.  While people do not use this incident to characterize Bill Maher poorly they do use these incidents to characterize Trump poorly, including Bill Maher who for some reason stopped doing comedy though he still claims to be a comedian.

If you were to use the argument that you have to allow freedom of speech Bill Maher is equally guilty.  You have to ask yourself if a group of people has come together at a specific period of time for an express purpose does another individual or group have the right to hijack that forum for an antagonistic purpose in order to thwart the will of the majority?  If the size of the group that assembles determines the importance of their effort does that not mean that Trump’s rallies have more of a right to silence dissent than does Bill Maher?

Realizing that Donald did not himself bodily assail anybody they try to say that his speech created an environment for this kind of conduct to flourish.  The same people that make this argument insist that groups like Black Lives Matter and Islam are not responsible for their own hateful rhetoric & ideology.  Islam is not responsible for the fact that it uses the word “terror” and encourages it’s members to terrorize non mooslems and states that Mohammed was made successful through terrorism.  Barack Hussein Obama insists that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam he might just as well tell us that Yellowness has nothing to do with Bananas.  Black Lives Matter isn’t responsible for their overtly racist message that ONLY black lives matter, while they ignore the fact that Black people kill more Black people than any other ethnic group.  And Black people kill far more white people than white people kill black people.

In the first case they conflate in order to demonize the person they don’t like by framing him as always THE CAUSE OF THE BAD.  In the second case the bifurcate and obfuscate in order to protect the reputation they are attempting to associate with always being THE CAUSE OF THE GOOD.  On top of this you see the levelling of false accusations, for example the lie that the KKK and David Duke endorsed Trump when they did not and he’s not responsible for their actions anyway.  Still others create these theoretical scenarios and tell us these bizarre imaginary vignettes of the future of what will happen if he gets elected president.  They ignore the fact that NOBODY thought Obama could have brought us to this precipice of human extinction or that he would be the worst president in history or that he would threaten the very survival of the existence of the United States of America.

At the same time Liberal Progressives try to fork responsibility off their own plates and onto the plates of Conservatives.  Islam is not responsible for the Evil that they do.  Black people are not responsible for their disproportionate violent crimes.  They transfer responsibility for the bad behavior of these groups and assert that the behavior is justified because of the Presupposed and Reified “Victimhood” of these groups even though if you go to parts of the world where they are not minorities you find the same bad behavior exists there in a more concentrated form and they are much more racist and prejudice in places where they are dominant.  All of this is done to excuse ideas and actions that should be confronted and reformed, but how do you do that when people are willing to use physical violence to silence your voice and change your mind?  The only way you can defend yourself or change the tide is through Violent Revolution if people refuse to recognize the Authority of Reason.  So because the people who are the problem and who are causing the problem refuse to back down and conform the rhetoric on both sides escalates but blame is not equally shared and often misattributed.

The bias is created by the Soft Bigotry of Low Expectation.  Because we consider one group harmless because they can’t compete on a level playing field without cheating we create disparate impact in their favor by holding them to a different standard and allowing them to use “Evil Means”.  In doing so we are not only enabling their Worser Demons and the Lowest Element in their ranks we are encouraging Evil itself.  It becomes normal to say that one group of people is allowed to be self interested, to protect themselves and pursue their own success and happiness but it is not okay for another group of people to do the same.  This is the very definition of prejudice.  Liberal Progressives have and Ideological Fascists have redefined Prejudice as something that only white people are guilty of and all of their success comes from “White Privilege” these terms reify ideas that can’t be substantiated and haven’t been scientifically proven and they come from the same sources the veritable #LynchMob that is trying to persecute people and organizations as “Science Deniers” when the Science hasn’t been proven.

“Do not go gentle into that good night, old age should rage and burn at the closing of the day; Rage, Rage, at the dying of the Light.” ~ Dylan Thomas

 

Ted Cruz’ Soft Bigotry of Low Expectation

UnTrusTed

Un Trust Ted

Nothing about this guy is true.  Ted isn’t even his name, it’s his nickname.  He has spent all of his life pretending to be everything but what he is, a sleazy, sneaky, unlikeable, creepy, mean-spirited, back-stabbing, social climbing, jerk.

At one point, when I knew nothing about him, I actually liked him.  At one time I was in favor of a Cruz/Trump ticket.  While I am one of the biggest contributors to the major Trump Community on Google Plus I attempted to help out the Ted Cruz community on there by posting my memes.  The moderator of the community, revealing his contempt for freedom of expression, asked me to remove my pictures from the group.  Then when Ted Cruz started attacking Donald Trump he used one of the ideas I HAD GIVEN HIM  against Trump.  CLICK HERE TO SEE WHERE THE JUMPING THE SHARK IDEA CAME FROM

One of my biggest pet peeves is when I try to teach people something and they use it against me or contrary to my will.  As I learned more about “Ted” what I found was that he considered himself quite the comedian in his younger days with a very raunchy sense of humor.  Also he loved the Fonz even thinking of himself as a Fonzarelli like figure.  Like many phony evangelists he thinks that he is the most deserving of the vagina because he is so Christian.  This is self negating and entirely self referentially inconsistent as well as being completely dishonest.  Not only does it mean he is a Fake Christian it means that he is constantly, consciously lying to people in order to manipulate them.

Recently he stated that women shouldn’t have to sign up for the draft.  He mentioned his young preteen daughters and said that he doesn’t want them to have to fight or something to that effect.  Well guess what, we aren’t going to be sending 6 year olds off to defend us from the Russians, idiot.  This is shameless pandering and an intentional emotional appeal from the creep who is supposed to be considered “World Class in Debate”.  He is attempting to appear to be manly but lets examine the logic behind his argument.  The world is becoming a more dangerous place every day and whether you want to admit it or not we are on the verge of World War.  Part of what is wrong with this country is that sentimental Femi-Nazis & Liberal Trolls who aren’t willing to do what is necessary to defend this country also have an equal vote.  People who aren’t willing to protect the country shouldn’t be allowed to speak as authorities on the defense of the country, nor should they have an equal vote.  In order for every person to be on the same page about the threats that our nation faces and what we need to do in order to protect Her, EVERYBODY needs to be willing to do their fair share.  This is the reason whey Israel is so successful because everybody has to serve for 2 years after High School.  That is the way things should be in America as well.  That is what is necessary in order for us to have a singular identity as a people.

Furthermore, this is discounting to women and it holds them to a lower standard.  It suggests that Real Feminism is defined by women who don’t want to serve or defend the country.  It assumes that women want to be championed by condescending men with this Romantic and Archaic mentality from the Dark Ages.  It shows a cognitive dissonance about the future and the current state of affairs in the world and lastly it characterizes the people defending and promoting Cruz as emotionally aberrated, religious Zealots, with a warped sense of Christianity and Patriotism.

Cruz’ campaign is intentionally attempting to brand him as some manner of Savior or Moses trying to “Free Christians” but in all reality he is attempting to create a kind of Fundamentalist Christian Rule, which I find highly undesirable, hypocritical, and offensive.

false christs