Consider this a bit of a Psychological Paedophile on Bill Nye, if you will. What exactly was he thinking when he said that Climate Change deniers tend to be older and they should die? First of all, I am younger than him by far. Secondly, I don’t deny that Climate Change is happening. What I disagree with is the proposed solution to the problem that is being proffered by the Liberal Progressives. Global Communism where production is controlled by a secret priest class is not an acceptable option. That is a Theocracy of Fake Science with no accountability to the people. They are using it as a form of Ideological Fascism in order to have a Monopoly on every facet of society.
What they really intend to do is reduce the population of the World drastically. Water Vapor is one of the worst causes of Greenhouse Gasses. 95% of Global Warming is caused by Water Vapor, but they aren’t trying to control that, yet. . . They are targeting the gas that is caused by production and living organisms. 95% of Global Warming is caused by Water Vapor.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” ~Max Planck
Bill Nye is bastardizing a quote by Max Planck. The quote applied to the Scientific Community not the populace. Scientism Priests are sick of explaining, persuading, and talking to low-lifes such as us, but Science is the Explanatory Art. These aren’t Scientists they are Pharisees. They are intent on increasing their own personal authority.
Their plan is already in full swing. Read the Lyrics in (ONLY) where Lil Wayne talks about running in your house and snatching up your children, and yes I am talking to you Tucker Carlson. They are indoctrinating and propagandizing our children in order to eventually make them wards of the state. They are attempting to create a generational rift. This is their End Game. They already tipped their hand so they have to double down. They cannot and will not back off. It is all or nothing.
Can they afford to lose when everybody knows that they seek the death of all who disagree with them and refuses to participate with their agenda? When we know that they want us to live like dumb animals with no knowledge of math so we don’t know when we are being lied to?
For all legitimate Religions their Rules and Laws only apply to members, those who have adopted the Philosophy. Not so for Islam, not only do they have Commandments that everybody in the 🌎World🌍 eventually has to convert to Islam, but people that haven’t been forced to convert are also subject to Sharia Law. Islam is an Invasive, Violent, Fascist, Totalitarian, Political Ideology.
Being an Atheist, or being Critical of Islam in any way, shape, or form is punishable by the Death Penalty.
Jizya is a tax that all Non-Moslems are force to pay if they are to be Tolerated before their eventual Forced Conversion or Assassination.
Zakat, the fifth pillar of Islam is mandatory for any practicing Moslem who can afford it and any Moslem bank or business. It is used to Fund the Mujahedeen (Jihadis/Terrorists who Murder Non-Moslems). It is also used as a charity for the families of Martyrs (Jihadis/Terrorists that Murdered Non-Moslems).
Sahih Bukhari (52:220) – Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’
Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (Sahih Bukhari 4:52:220)
Any Homosexual, whether they are Moslem or Non-Moslem is subject to the Death Penalty under Sharia Law.
Unlike actual religions, Islam creates a Meritocracy of Physical Violence and Intimidation against all Non-Members. It places those who fight for the Cause of Allah at the top of the Hierarchy of Islam.
Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His cause” Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to “rows” or “battle array,” meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9), which defines the “cause”: “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.” (61:10). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.
Prayer won’t stop Islam only Action will.
If you doubt what We have revealed to Our servant, produce one chapter comparable to it. Call upon your idols to assist you, if what you say be true. But if you fail (as you are sure to fail) then guard yourselves against the Fire whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the unbelievers. Quran 2:23-4, “The Cow,”
Islam is the Only “Religion” that mentions and Glamourizes Terrorism.
Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”
In the above video you see an incident in which Bill Maher physically kicks a protestor out of his audience. His Liberal Progressive audience applauds enthusiastically. Bill Maher actually brags about this incident and has the footage used to advertise his show.
Now lets switch gears to Donald Trump and the current controversies and compare the bias and accusations. Trumps audience members, Secret Service, and Security have thrown out audience members or in some instances attacked other audience members. Bill Maher has a few hundred people in his audience, Donald Trump has tens of thousands of people at his rallies.
While Bill Maher personally silences protestors, Donald Trump does not personally do so. While Donald Trump gets constant threats on his life Bill Maher doesn’t suffer the same situation. While people do not use this incident to characterize Bill Maher poorly they do use these incidents to characterize Trump poorly, including Bill Maher who for some reason stopped doing comedy though he still claims to be a comedian.
If you were to use the argument that you have to allow freedom of speech Bill Maher is equally guilty. You have to ask yourself if a group of people has come together at a specific period of time for an express purpose does another individual or group have the right to hijack that forum for an antagonistic purpose in order to thwart the will of the majority? If the size of the group that assembles determines the importance of their effort does that not mean that Trump’s rallies have more of a right to silence dissent than does Bill Maher?
Realizing that Donald did not himself bodily assail anybody they try to say that his speech created an environment for this kind of conduct to flourish. The same people that make this argument insist that groups like Black Lives Matter and Islam are not responsible for their own hateful rhetoric & ideology. Islam is not responsible for the fact that it uses the word “terror” and encourages it’s members to terrorize non mooslems and states that Mohammed was made successful through terrorism. Barack Hussein Obama insists that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam he might just as well tell us that Yellowness has nothing to do with Bananas. Black Lives Matter isn’t responsible for their overtly racist message that ONLY black lives matter, while they ignore the fact that Black people kill more Black people than any other ethnic group. And Black people kill far more white people than white people kill black people.
In the first case they conflate in order to demonize the person they don’t like by framing him as always THE CAUSE OF THE BAD. In the second case the bifurcate and obfuscate in order to protect the reputation they are attempting to associate with always being THE CAUSE OF THE GOOD. On top of this you see the levelling of false accusations, for example the lie that the KKK and David Duke endorsed Trump when they did not and he’s not responsible for their actions anyway. Still others create these theoretical scenarios and tell us these bizarre imaginary vignettes of the future of what will happen if he gets elected president. They ignore the fact that NOBODY thought Obama could have brought us to this precipice of human extinction or that he would be the worst president in history or that he would threaten the very survival of the existence of the United States of America.
At the same time Liberal Progressives try to fork responsibility off their own plates and onto the plates of Conservatives. Islam is not responsible for the Evil that they do. Black people are not responsible for their disproportionate violent crimes. They transfer responsibility for the bad behavior of these groups and assert that the behavior is justified because of the Presupposed and Reified “Victimhood” of these groups even though if you go to parts of the world where they are not minorities you find the same bad behavior exists there in a more concentrated form and they are much more racist and prejudice in places where they are dominant. All of this is done to excuse ideas and actions that should be confronted and reformed, but how do you do that when people are willing to use physical violence to silence your voice and change your mind? The only way you can defend yourself or change the tide is through Violent Revolution if people refuse to recognize the Authority of Reason. So because the people who are the problem and who are causing the problem refuse to back down and conform the rhetoric on both sides escalates but blame is not equally shared and often misattributed.
The bias is created by the Soft Bigotry of Low Expectation. Because we consider one group harmless because they can’t compete on a level playing field without cheating we create disparate impact in their favor by holding them to a different standard and allowing them to use “Evil Means”. In doing so we are not only enabling their Worser Demons and the Lowest Element in their ranks we are encouraging Evil itself. It becomes normal to say that one group of people is allowed to be self interested, to protect themselves and pursue their own success and happiness but it is not okay for another group of people to do the same. This is the very definition of prejudice. Liberal Progressives have and Ideological Fascists have redefined Prejudice as something that only white people are guilty of and all of their success comes from “White Privilege” these terms reify ideas that can’t be substantiated and haven’t been scientifically proven and they come from the same sources the veritable #LynchMob that is trying to persecute people and organizations as “Science Deniers” when the Science hasn’t been proven.
“Do not go gentle into that good night, old age should rage and burn at the closing of the day; Rage, Rage, at the dying of the Light.” ~ Dylan Thomas
“You can’t repeat a pattern you never created in the first place.”
Since the beginning of time there have been two warring impulses in the Human Genome, Good & Evil, Freedom & Tyranny. The Frontal Lobe of our brains holds our Moral Evolution it is the last part of our brain to Neurally Myelinate because it is the most recent Evolutionary adaptation. Repetition of thought and action creates Neural Myelination which is passed down to our children through Cellular Memory (Epigenetics) predisposing them to have our weaknesses as well as strengths.
Neural Myelination is like grooves in the rode in an old western town. When our ancestors drove their horse drawn buggy through the town it was raining and the wheels made deep grooves in the road. Now as we drive through that town, that represents our life, the grooves in the road are deep, which means the wheels on our buggy fall into the grooves in the road made by our ancestors. That means it is easier to do things the way they did them than it is to not do things identically. Though cellular memory has been demonstrated repeatedly through different experiments it is being rejected because it is being categorized as racist. Science isn’t racist. Facts aren’t racist. The imperfection is in the eye of the perceiver.
In order for an Uncivilized person to become Civilized they have to break pattern. The vast majority of mutations are not positive I. E. cannibalism is undesirable and an immoral facet of evolution in Papua New Guinea. So in order to break pattern in a positive way one either needs to exert an influence on one self to become more moral having some gift for determining what is and is not moral (for example through the agency of Philosophy and Socratic Dialogue or Rational Relationship as the Math Cults did) or one needs to have a force exerted upon them from an external source. These are the only two ways in which positive moral genetic mutations are achieved.
The Math Cults that created the Major World Civilizations also wrote the Bible, this isn’t a commonly known fact but I can debate it extensively. I have written about it under the pen name “Rabbi Ba’al Shivah” you can google that name. The Freemasons who were the Founding Fathers and who conceived of this Great Nation as though they were given Fire from the Gods, trace their origins to that Math Cults of Pythagoras who brought to us the Guru Tradition in it’s Pristine and Uncorrupted form. They would suffer anything up to and including torture and death to prevent a Freemasonic Word from falling into the hands of a “ruffian” or non Initiate. From the perspective of the Math Cults every Mathematical Formula was a Name of God and synonymous with a Freemasonic Word. The reason for this is that they knew there was such a thing as enemies of Civilization and some people would use anything they learned to remove Civilization from the earth.
Exampli Gratis, Syed Farook. Look at the people who are supporting ISIS, many of them were educated in the West. What have they done with that education? Mooslems that reject Western Knowledge as coming from the Devil use everything they learn to undermine and destroy the West. While they claim to be a Judeo-Christian Religion they believe they are above the Law of the Land BECAUSE they are untainted by the Original Sin, Knowledge. In order for Civilization to survive Technological Corporations MUST have a bias in favor of the Civilized World and against the Enemies of Civilization. Look at how ISIS responds to the begrudging Social Media crackdown of Twitter & Facebook.
Not to mention, neural myelination is passed on because it predisposes future generations to survival. What we are witnessing in the world right now is not Evolution it is a Devolving of the Human Species because the stupidest and worst among us are killing off through genocide those morally and intellectually superior to themselves.
“Alas, the time of the most despicable man is coming, he that is no longer able to despise himself.”
Thus Spake Zarathustra
The first time I read the God Delusion, I knew it was wrong on a number of points, but recently Richard Dawkins said some things that mad me interested in the book again and I bought a copy and started rereading it. I didn’t realize the first time what a truly manipulative and strategic communicator he really was. The reason this is important to me is that some of you know that I am a psycholinguist that looks for psychopathic patterns in communication and psychopaths are manipulative, strategic communicators.
One of Richards favorite tactics is to quote somebody else and agree with them instead of saying something himself, or he will invite somebody to make a logical fallacy that he himself doesn’t actually assert, or he will ask a question instead of making an assertion that could be falsified, he edits his consideration set to prove himself correct and he doesn’t include information that weakens his arguments. I will point out a couple of examples of these behaviors in his rants.
When the police are interrogating someone they look for the story to change, this is very important, how the story changes and what the story changes to because it can reveal intent to conceal or mislead. Every time the story changes it is important. When I first read the book Richard quotes a female friend of his as saying that she was sexually molested and it was “icky” but it did no long term damage and he agreed with her, then recently he said:
In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.
Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”
He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”
So we see that he was concealing his real narrative. This is a strategy that he uses repeatedly to avoid taking responsibility for what he is saying. Here is another instance where he is quoting Douglas Adams:
If somebody thinks taxes should go up or down you are free to have an argument about it. But on the other hand if somebody says ‘I mustn’t move a light switch on a Saturday’ you say, ‘I respect that’.
Who hear is expressing contempt for Orthodox Judaism? Is it Richard or Douglas? Who do I falsify? Does Richard agree with Douglas? If not why does he include the quote? In the next paragraph he he attacks Quakers, who started in England by rebelling against the Atheistic sexual debauchery and had to leave the country to get away from them. Now I don’t know about you, but I have never had an Chassidic Jew tell me that I wasn’t allowed to move a light switch on Saturday. Who is arguing for the authority to force Orthodox Jews to use the lights on Saturday? Not only are they mocking one of the first revolutions in civil rights, the original Holy Day, the first weekend that guaranteed that you were not allowed to work your slaves to death, and that you wouldn’t have to compete against people working 7 days a week and you had one day to yourself in which to relax and roger your wife, but it is also a post modernist movement for people that are tired of the rigors, deuchery, and psychopathic hypocrisy of modern life.
Oh, yeah, I will just leave this here….
“the right to be Christian seems in this case to mean the right to poke your nose into other people’s private lives’.”
EINSTEIN IS CONFUSING
“confuse” or enlighten? “deism is watered down theism“. Now what is so telling is that one moment he is saying that Deism is Theism and then he says he is not trying to debate Einstein’s god, but Einstein was a deist… Not only that, he doesn’t explain Einstein’s god because if he did some people would say, “Well, that is actually pretty interesting, I think I might be a deist too” and then they wouldn’t be as easily hypnotized by his propaganda that they must from now on harass and bully religious people. Richard Dawkins is not an authority on deism and he defines it falsely. I should know, I am a deist, Einstein and myself have the same god.
This is truly bizarre, he quotes Adolf Hitler verbatim but he doesn’t give credit to Hitler for the quote.
Now why is it that knowledge has to be fought? That is what is so strange about this quote, not only does it tell me he is most likely quoting Hitler, it tells me that he is manipulating people. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, unfortunately most Americans are not smart enough to detect what is for me the powerful stench of horse shit. He can easily befuddle the minds of people with a little bit of knowledge and turn them against the people of faith, just like somebody else I know, hmmm….
One of his communication strategies is to borrow authority from other cool people to make his ideas seem more hip. He uses the Beatles song to support his claim that without religion there would be no violence because there would be no clicks or groups of people that disagree with one another and fight each other. Not only is this assertion unproven, that a world without religion would be a peaceful world, but he ignores the fact that state enforced atheism has always failed, and has always been associated with violence and human rights atrocities. Furthermore, he ignores the fact of the first two primary influences of the Beatles music. Not to mention he is smart enough to know that children are not born as blank slates, that is why Noam Chomsky is famous, he falsified the Behaviorists who thought that children were blank slates. On top of that, if lets say we got rid of Islam would the thought tools, Abeed, Harem, and Taqiyya disappear? Would people no longer think in those terms? Or should we eradicate their language as well, like the Catholics who indoctrinated people into their own language?
Yukteswar Giri (also written yuktesvara, Sri Yukteswar) (Bengali: শ্রী যুক্তেশ্বর গিরী) (10 May 1855 – 9 March 1936) is the monastic name of Priya Nath Karar (Bengali: প্রিয়নাথ কাঁড়ার), the guru of Satyananda Giri and Paramahansa Yogananda. Yukteswar was an educator, astronomer, a Jyotisha (Vedic astrologer), a yogi, and a scholar of the Bhagavad Gitaand the Bible. He was a disciple of Lahiri Mahasaya of Varanasi and a member of the Giri branch of the swami order. Yogananda considered Yukteswar as Jnanavatar, or “Incarnation of Wisdom”.
Aleister Crowley (/ˈkroʊli/; born Edward Alexander Crowley; 12 October 1875 – 1 December 1947) was an Englishoccultist, ceremonial magician, poet, painter, novelist, and mountaineer. He was responsible for founding the religion and philosophy of Thelema, in which role he identified himself as the prophet entrusted with guiding humanity into theAeon of Horus in the early 20th century.
And then Richard contradicts himself again by creating another clique or group of people that is adversarial with everybody else…
“Indeed, organizing atheists has been compared to herding cats, because they tend to think independently and will not conform to authority. But a good first step would be to build up a critical mass of those willing to ‘come out,’ thereby encouraging others to do so. Even if they can’t be herded, cats in sufficient numbers can make a lot of noise and they cannot be ignored.”
Now what I find so interesting about the behavior of Atheists is that Atheism was not an organization, it was the absence of the presence of the belief in god, as such their behavior was not informed by Atheism and not organized. Now it is becoming organized and informed. But Atheists while attacking other groups ignore the bad stuff that their people say and do, just like a religion, while insisting that their bad behavior doesn’t characterize Atheism, at the same time atheists cannot be falsified by any praxis of Atheism, since they are still insisting that it is not an organization when in fact it is. Atheism is becoming a religion. What they are forgetting is that the highest form of their good is the absence of the presence of a form of good… If you want to talk about Delusional…
He just won’t give up on defending pedophilia. Notice the change in narrative, the first time he spoke it happened to a woman, then it happened to him, and it was “putting hands in my shorts” and then he mentioned it again and this time it was, “putting hands in clothes” he is using vague tautologies in order to make the whole matter look more harmless, and he is using an exaggerated comparison set in order to herd people towards the answer he wants in order to make it look more reasonable than it is.
I have spent a lot of time studying how psychopaths like Hitler rise to power, how they communicate harmlessness, and how they pass your threat filter, and then they get behind you and get you doing their dirty work. In the book click!, they say the fastest way to get a group of people to have a sense of unity is by instilling in them a shared sense of suffering, they need to feel victimized, persecuted. And then he uses his scientific authority to get them to attack his enemies, while he stays at home and “mildly” Frotteurises your children, but as my stand up comedy alter ego says: