The English term “man” is derived from a Proto-Indo-European root *man- (see Sanskrit/Avestan manu-, Slavic mǫž “man, male”). More directly, the word derives from Old English mann. The Old English form had a default meaning of “adult male” (which was the exclusive meaning of wer), though it could also signify a person of unspecified gender. The closely related Old English pronoun man was used just as it is in Modern German to designate “one” (e. g., in the saying man muss mit den Wölfen heulen). The Old English form is derived from Proto-Germanic *mannz, “human being, person”, which is also the etymon of German Mann “man, husband” and man “one” (pronoun), Old Norse maðr, and Gothic manna. According to Tacitus, the mythological progenitor of the Germanic tribes was called Mannus. *Manus in Indo-European mythology was the first man, see Mannus, Manu (Hinduism).
If you idiots don’t know what an “etymology” is, you need to look it up and educate your dumb asses. (free education, click here)
If it is too hard for you to wrap your retarded little brains around. There is this thing called “Proto-Indo-European” and English is a PIE language.
Manu is a term found with various meanings in Hinduism. In early texts, it refers to the archetypal man, or to the first man (progenitor of humanity).The Sanskrit term for ‘human’, मानव (IAST: mānava) means ‘of Manu’ or ‘children of Manu’.(SOURCE)
Lastly, I suspect but cannot prove, (because my research isn’t complete) that the word “man” comes from the word “mammal” in which case Man is named after the Mammary gland or female breast.
What really irritates me is that Liberal Progressives have routinely demonstrated themselves to be too stupid to evaluate the depths of their own stupidity and factually wrong about everything all of the time.