About 8 years ago Bruce Buena de Mesqita did a TED talk in which he purported to have an algorithm that could predict social events. He applied it to Iran and generated a number of predictions. At that time I was working on fleshing out my psychopath models and I immediately responded, “his algorithm doesn’t account for psychopathic behavior.” To this day almost all of his predictions are dead wrong, the only on he got right was that students would protest. What makes my psychological models so different from everybody else’s? Well regular psychology is based on comparing the individual to the normal person in society, but if society itself is becoming psychopathic then psychopathy is the norm. My models don’t compare the individual to the norm they compare the individual to the rational person. My models were created, in part, observing troll behavior online. When I am trying to understand a person I ask myself who is the person saying this,? What story are they in? And what character are they playing in that story? How well are they playing that character and what missteps are they making in portraying that character? Some people refer to this as profiling and they think that something is wrong with it. That presupposes a superficial nature to relationship in which you don’t really understand anyone around you and you don’t scrutinize or examine them closely. PRAXIS IS THE KEY Ancient civilizations had this concept of Praxis, which is essentially, the individual has a philosophy, that philosophy is known and it informs the behavior of the individual. The words Process and Practice come from the word Praxis. People are a lot less philosophical nowadays but belief still informs action. So it is possible, with careful attention, to know why a person is doing what they are doing and what they will do in the future, for reasons we will discuss. In my Organic Computer Theory I hold that humans are a lot more predictable than people think. If you understand the individual you know how they will interpret events and how they will react to those events. Every event has positive or negative survival data to the individual this is the Binary Code for Organic Computers.
My psycholinguistic technique is to compare what a person says, with what they do, with what they think. Psychopaths conceal who they really are and represent themselves strategically. Psychopaths lie, they manipulate, they are authoritarian, they are aggressively narcissistic, they have innate feelings of superiority. They do not have a sense of humor about themselves. They feel that everything they do is good because they are the one’s doing it and they feel that they are deserving of everything they want. They don’t respect the boundaries of other people because they don’t feel that other people are equal to themselves. So, what is Islam? Islam is a tyrannical, psychopathic, masculine only perspective. If your philosophy is arbitrary it creates a disparate impact and is therefore invalid, which is to say it isn’t a genuine philosophy. If your philosophy can’t be used to falsify you it isn’t valid. MARRIAGE IN ISLAM The Greeks, Jews, and Christians in an effort to separate themselves from the tyrannical practices of the East created a different marriage contract, a business contract, women had rights but also responsibilities. In Islam which is resurrected and cleverly re-branded ancient evil from Babylon and Persia, marriage is a property contract in which women have no rights but they do have copious responsibilities. OEDIPAL AGGRESSION Jews and Christians demonstrate aggression towards the penis slightly shaming men for the sexual urge. Catholics shame girls so that they will take more responsibility for having sex and exert an influence on themselves to choose a mate wisely. In Islam it is a common practice to cut off the clitoris and labia and bind the legs together so that they grow over the vagina so that the first act of intercourse is painful. Women are not supposed to enjoy sex in Islam, that makes them whores.
SEXUAL SHAMING In the west we have a feminine bias, which means we tacitly frame women as the cause of the good and men as the cause of the bad. In Islam it is reversed. Men can get closer to the children, the penis is the cause of the good and is not suspect, women and the vagina is the cause of the bad. Men are not shamed for their sexual desires. It takes 4 witnesses to accuse a man of adultery, and he can have multiple wives and sex slaves. If a man is accused of adultery and is to be stoned, he is buried up to the knees or waist while a woman is buried up to her shoulders, if he escapes he gets to live, same goes for her. While bestiality is forbidden here is how Muslims typically punish offenders. http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Bestiality#In_the_Islamic_world AUTHORITARIANISM Islam was designed to create disparate impact in it’s own favor. The fastest growing population on earth is also the stupidest and most violent. Mohammed resurrected a priest class which hasn’t been seen since Ancient Egypt or earlier. Writing evolved and religion evolved but Islam devolved. The Priest class interprets the holy writings and tells Muslims what to think, how to feel, and what to do. Saudi Arabia translates fewer books into Arabic than any other country by far, Greece translates almost 2x as many books into Greek.
With rich, vexatious lawyers, they change the laws so that you can’t criticize them or scrutinize them. The prevent Bill Maher, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and other anti-islam advocates from stating their case. They push to get blasphemy laws legalized so that you can’t make fun of their religion or their prophets. I am not part of your religion, how is it that you can legislate my opinions and expression? Muslims presuppose their right to judge others by their values and then act as judge, jury, and executioner, literally. If that isn’t a narcissistic, authoritarian mentality I don’t know what is. Also the very act of speaking out against another Muslim is a potential act of apostasy which is punishable by death. Which means that Jamal can go martyr himself and blow up a synagogue in Turkey, but if you say anything bad about him you are an infidel. PATHOLOGICAL LYING In Shi’a Islam, taqiyya (تقیة taqiyyah/taqīyah) is a form of religious dissimulation‘, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution. The corresponding concept in Sunni Islam is known as idtirar (إضطرار) “coercion”. A related concept is known as kitman “concealment; dissimulation by omission”. Also related is the concept of ḥiyal, legalistic deception practiced not necessarily in a religious context but to gain political or legalistic advantage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya So a religion that admits it is based on a lie, that openly states the only people that believe Mohammed’s lie are the nations that are going to get screwed by the Muslims, also protects itself and promotes itself by lying. In closing, it is obvious to me that Islam is a psychopathic ideology, more so than any other religion, and Islam is doing what it intended to do. To just sit back and think that they will somehow stop is delusional. They have no incentive to stop. They have no incentive to be reasonable. They are already succeeding.
Now the difference between the Psychopath and a rational or sane person is that the Psychopath acts out of emotional morbidity. I created Shared State Theory of Communication in part because I was observing two things, the fact that I was aware of the fact that I was changing states, emotional states and the way I was in relationship with people, the world, facts, and events. While every time I would communicate that I had changed states I noticed that almost everybody else would change the way they were in relationship with me and the relationship either without knowing, or without communicating that something had changed.
Whereas I was able to be self aware, self conscious, and self controlled, these appeared to be intelligences that others did not possess in the same proportions or at all. I was constantly the victim of this unconscious changing of states, some of the time it was strategic, subversive, or passive aggressive. I was the first to get screwed. Instead of being considered a virtue, people seemed to consider being self aware a form of sorcery of which they were suspicious. Baba Muktananda had always mentioned how he studied people that were successful and people that failed. I found this interesting as well, how over and over again I was the first person to get sold down the river, not because I was wrong, or bad at my job, but because people feared my knowledge, insight, and ability. They didn’t want to compete with me on a level playing field because they were afraid of how they would look in comparison to me, and they would have been right, given a chance I would have made them look like they were moving backwards in time. This is also a clue to why we as a country and a world are in the state of affairs that we are in. No money in the economy, cleptocracy in the banks and stockmarket, propaganda in the media, puppets in the government.
Knowing that I was in an emotionally morbid state I wouldn’t make decisions or act. Psychopaths on the other hand only act on their issues, and out of emotionally morbid states. They don’t take responsibility for their issues or their emotions, as far as they are concerned, everybody else is responsible for their emotions and their emotions are responsible for their behavior. So a psychopath will throw an histrionic fit, and it is your fault, because you attacked them by existing and them being aware of your existence.
Histrionic psychopaths keep their pain fresh, like an open wound, and they use it as a source of power, they are consciously looking for things to get offended by and they think they win be getting offended. Then when they have an opportunity they loose their venom on somebody that they are projecting their damage onto.
We now know that Anger comes from feelings of frustration, according to my SSTOC people are always communicating whatever state they are in, even if they are concealing that state, they are probably still leaking that state. A person that feels thwarted will communicate thwartedness, unjustly thwarting others that don’t deserve it. In an environment in which people are not educated knowing psychology, America, and not encouraged to be mentally healthy, what we see now is a creeping normalcy. People are acquisitively mimetic, and they copy behaviors they see. Monkey see monkey do, ad nauseum. I refer to it as the tragedy of the commons in regard to strategic behavior.
The problem with modern psychology is that it is normative, which means that it compares the individual to the normal person in society which presupposes that the society itself isn’t batshit insane. Which as it happens right now, is the case. This also means that people that are quite rational will be singled out, and considered insane, because the crazy society has to be protected from the sane individuals that every day see the decay of the form of the good.
As part of my theory of rational relationship, a person should communicate in a timely manner if their behavior has been modified from what is rational or expected or necessary so that the other person can respond or change their mind or plan. This maximizes the value in a rational relationship. If you don’t communicate correctly, you do not think correctly and you do not act correctly which means the end result will be bad. All force is a subtle form of rape.
Some of you know my theory on how philosophy and religion came to the west from India through Greece and for those of you this word will be meaningful.
auspicious (adj.) 1590s, “of good omen” (implied in auspiciously), from Latin auspicium “divination by observing the flight of birds,” from auspex (genitive auspicis) + -ous. Related:Auspiciously; auspiciousness.
- Of good omen; indicating future success.
- Conducive to success.
- This is an auspicious day.
- Marked by success; prosperous.
Ask yourself these questions: What stimulated my need recognition? What are my intentions? What is my motivation? What is my desire? What is my end game? What is my desired result?
Things end as they begin, and nothing ends well that is motivated by negative emotions.