Tag Archives: morality

Tim Cook & Apple are Enemies of Civilization

fbi

“You can’t repeat a pattern you never created in the first place.”

~Shivastus Solomonicus

Since the beginning of time there have been two warring impulses in the Human Genome, Good & Evil, Freedom & Tyranny.  The Frontal Lobe of our brains holds our Moral Evolution it is the last part of our brain to Neurally Myelinate because it is the most recent Evolutionary adaptation.  Repetition of thought and action creates Neural Myelination which is passed down to our children through Cellular Memory (Epigenetics) predisposing them to have our weaknesses as well as strengths.

Neural Myelination is like grooves in the rode in an old western town.  When our ancestors drove their horse drawn buggy through the town it was raining and the wheels made deep grooves in the road.  Now as we drive through that town, that represents our life, the grooves in the road are deep, which means the wheels on our buggy fall into the grooves in the road made by our ancestors.  That means it is easier to do things the way they did them than it is to not do things identically.  Though cellular memory has been demonstrated repeatedly through different experiments it is being rejected because it is being categorized as racist.  Science isn’t racist.  Facts aren’t racist.  The imperfection is in the eye of the perceiver.

In order for an Uncivilized person to become Civilized they have to break pattern.  The vast majority of mutations are not positive I. E. cannibalism is undesirable and an immoral facet of evolution in Papua New Guinea.  So in order to break pattern in a positive way one either needs to exert an influence on one self to become more moral having some gift for determining what is and is not moral (for example through the agency of Philosophy and Socratic Dialogue or Rational Relationship as the Math Cults did) or one needs to have a force exerted upon them from an external source.  These are the only two ways in which positive moral genetic mutations are achieved.

The Math Cults that created the Major World Civilizations also wrote the Bible, this isn’t a commonly known fact but I can debate it extensively.  I have written about it under the pen name “Rabbi Ba’al Shivah” you can google that name.  The Freemasons who were the Founding Fathers and who conceived of this Great Nation as though they were given Fire from the Gods, trace their origins to that Math Cults of Pythagoras who brought to us the Guru Tradition in it’s Pristine and Uncorrupted form.  They would suffer anything up to and including torture and death to prevent a Freemasonic Word from falling into the hands of a “ruffian” or non Initiate.  From the perspective of the Math Cults every Mathematical Formula was a Name of God and synonymous with a Freemasonic Word.  The reason for this is that they knew there was such a thing as enemies of Civilization and some people would use anything they learned to remove Civilization from the earth.

Exampli Gratis, Syed Farook.  Look at the people who are supporting ISIS, many of them were educated in the West.  What have they done with that education?  Mooslems that reject Western Knowledge as coming from the Devil use everything they learn to undermine and destroy the West.  While they claim to be a Judeo-Christian Religion they believe they are above the Law of the Land BECAUSE they are untainted by the Original Sin, Knowledge.  In order for Civilization to survive Technological Corporations MUST have a bias in favor of the Civilized World and against the Enemies of Civilization.  Look at how ISIS responds to the begrudging Social Media crackdown of Twitter & Facebook.

Not to mention, neural myelination is passed on because it predisposes future generations to survival.  What we are witnessing in the world right now is not Evolution it is a Devolving of the Human Species because the stupidest and worst among us are killing off through genocide those morally and intellectually superior to themselves.

“Alas, the time of the most despicable man is coming, he that is no longer able to despise himself.”

Thus Spake Zarathustra

HeilHillary2.png

Advertisements

Richard Dawkins Deconstructed by the Mindhacker.

Image

So, I am going to practice describing Richard Dawkins inner world based on my psychological models and using my terms.  It is good for me to practice describing peoples profiles so I get used to using my thought technology (terms).  Religious language, in a manner of speaking, describes our internal world or the way we think the world works.  Our internal world is our soul, or our gestalt, it is our understanding of the world.  Now what is interesting with some atheists with the conceit that god doesn’t exist is that they don’t have any system for describing their internal world workings, which is to say they can’t scrutinize themselves.  Now I created my psycholinguistic model for detecting psychopaths while I was observing troll behavior on social networking sites.  Psychopaths conceal their true self and represent themselves falsely.  My model was created to understand the soul of people that were concealing themselves and revealing themselves strategically, people that don’t want to be understood.

Richard Dawkins, narrative recently changed, in his book, THE GOD DELUSION he mentions that a female associate of his said emotional abuse is worse than physical abuse and that he agrees with her.  Then recently this statement changed to, I was physically abused and I can’t condemn mild pedophilia.  One of the things I do in my deconstruction of narrative is learn to distinguish between authentic behavior and strategic behavior.  The second piece is closer to his true narrative (what is actually going on in his head)  but he is still concealing, although he did sidle up to his true narrative a little.  Now we look for variations on the narrative, and look for different deviations of narrative, and potentially contradictions.  One could say “nancy is a little loose” “nancy is a floozy” or “nancy is a slut.”  Each statement communicates slightly different data and characterizes the person speaking and the relationship between the two objects.  “I was molested and I can’t condemn it” in no way contradicts the narratives, “I enjoyed it” or “I wouldn’t mind doing it”.  So just like minesweeper we are going to go through his other actions and statements all of which are tautologies from his world view, as we think, so we speak, and so we act, unless you are a psychopath and concealing yourself, but we have the MIND HACKER on our side.

Image

(http://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/28/everything-i-know-looks-through-me/)

Richard Dawkins was habituated into an environment that was highly sexually charged at a young age, boys punished each other sexually, and they rewarded each other sexually too, C.S. Lewis experienced this behavior in school, the boys called it tarting and fagging.  Dawkins also had a teacher that rewarded the boys with sexual attention, and put his hands in his pants at one point and knocked his junk around.  People have a normative bias, they think what is normal is good.  Although Dawkins portrays himself as a victim of circumstances as a tacit emotional appeal, I suspect that he actually enjoyed the environment, and the sexual attention and we will get into why later.  It is also important to mention that in Richard Dawkin’s mind, learning is associated with sexual arousal (and so is teaching), from his experience, teaching and learning are sexy and arousing.

Psychopaths perseverate in their behavior and internal narrative.  Psychopaths can’t reform they only become more manipulative.

In psychology and psychiatry, perseveration is the repetition of a particular response, such as a word, phrase, or gesture, despite the absence or cessation of a stimulus, usually caused by brain injury or other organic disorder.[1] Symptoms include “the inability to switch ideas along with the social context, as evidenced by the repetition of words or gestures after they have ceased to be socially relevant or appropriate,”[2] or the “act or task of doing so,”[3] and are not better described as stereotypy (a highly repetitive idiosyncratic behaviour).

The mind is averse, and it reacts against things it doesn’t like.  This eventually creates the form of the conquest for psychopaths.  Being morbidly in relationship with their issues and in the case of a histrionic psychopath clinging to those issues instead of seeking mental health, they need to change or attack whoever they blame for whatever their mind is averse to.  So what is Richard Dawkins mind averse to?

Image

He is averse to shame and he blames Religion as the cause of the bad for his shame.  Now when he says “child abuse” he is referring to emotional abuse and when we say emotional abuse we mean shame, specifically sexual shame.

Image

Notice the association between not being able to enjoy your life, and god not existing?  That is the way he is mentally in relationship with god.  If god exists it means you don’t get to enjoy your life.  Because of sexual shame.  So now we look for repeating occurrences in his behavior and narrative for sexual shame, what do we find?  Do we find a perseveration of emotional morbidity?

Out Campaign

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Out Campaign is a public awareness initiative for freethought and atheism. It was initiated by Dr. R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Executive Director of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, and is endorsed by Richard Dawkins, who is a prominent atheist.[1][2]

 

“There is a big closet population of atheists that need to come out.”  Richard Dawkins

R. Elisabeth Cornwell has stated that the gay rights movement was a source of inspiration for the campaign.[5] The campaign, however, encourages one to “out” only oneself; it invites atheists to:

  • Reach out and talk to others about atheism and help spread a positive view of atheism
  • Speak out about their own beliefs and values without feeling intimidated, thus helping people realize that atheists don’t fit stereotypes and are a very diverse group
  • Keep out, meaning to promote the idea that religion should be kept out of public schools and government, and that nobody’s religious agenda should be allowed to intimidate
  • Stand out and become visible in their communities and become involved. An offshoot of Stand out is the Non-Believers Giving Aid campaign, which has raised money to help out in the aftermath of disaster. The A+ symbol used in the campaign refers to Atheists Standing out for their activism in social and humanitarian efforts.

So we see he was inspired by a campaign for reversing the sexual shame of the stigma associated with being gay.  How do they identify themselves?

Image
The campaign aims to create more openness about being an atheist by providing a means by which atheists can identify themselves to others by displaying the movement’s scarlet letterA, an allusion to the scarlet letter A worn by Hester Prynne after being convicted of adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne‘s The Scarlet Letter.[3] It encourages those who wish to be part of the campaign to come out and re-appropriate, in a humorous way, the social stigma that in some places persists against atheism, by branding themselves with a scarlet letter.
Again we see the recurring theme of sexual shame.  What this signals to me is that he is concealing something that was very powerful and he is very averse to, and that was caused by his being shamed, by a religious person, and that is why the form of his conquest is to attack and marginalize religion, and humiliate and ridicule religious people.  Let’s see if we can’t piece together more of his narrative.
ImageImage

“Do you really mean to tell me the only reason you try to be good is to gain God’s approval and reward, or to avoid his disapproval and punishment? That’s not morality, that’s just sucking up, apple-polishing, looking over your shoulder at the great surveillance camera in the sky, or the still small wiretap inside your head, monitoring your every move, even your every base though.”

― Richard DawkinsThe God Delusion

So exactly where do morals come from?  And what are your morals Richard Dawkins?  Some of his arguments suggest that humans are innately moral.  I find this interesting.  I think he is suggesting that his morals are good which means that he doing what he wants is innately correct.  Because men are innately good, and we shouldn’t be being good because somebody is watching us or threatening us.  Are you starting to get the picture yet?  Let’s take it a step further, what of the morals of a psychopath or a sociopath or a child molester?  If people are innately good than whatever their morals allow them to do is also innately good.  How does he propose we agree on what is good and moral?  Should we turn Science into a religion?  and then science can tell us what is moral?  I mean this is coming from the man that wants to eradicate religion.  Should our morals come from the government?

RELATED ARTICLES