Tag Archives: linguistic determinism

Baizuo: The White Left

liberal retards

As an accomplished Taoist, Guru, and Zen master, I am constantly dismayed at the arrogance of Liberal Progressives who have NO UNDERSTANDING of Genuine Spirituality but presuppose themselves to be every person’s moral superior.

The Chinese, who probably pay more attention to American Politics than the drug addled, Hipster, Millennial, walking abortions have recently added a neologism to their repertoire. Previously they had the term “Saint Whore” in order to refer to the vaginal supremacist Western Woman who thought that she could usurp the Authority of the Lord and anoint her disciples with her moist and needy crevasse but now they have added to their vocabulary the term “Baizuo” which means “White Left”.

Baizuo is a Chinese epithet meaning naïve western educated person who advocated for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority. A baizuo only cares about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment; while being obsessed with political correctness to the extent that they import backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism.

The Chinese see the baizuo as ignorant and arrogant westerners who pity the rest of the world and think they are saviors.

I thought I was the only person who noticed how the Liberal Progressives have adopted every cloying, sanctimonious, smarmy affectation that I despised when I was forced to go to church every day. Creating a meritocracy of being a victim and having an unnamed priest class who controls my reputation and expects me to be in relationship with them for their benefit when I never get anything back from the church.

This is why Donald Trump is respected in the rest of the world and over performed in minority communities. Unbeknownst to themselves Liberal Progressives are the Laughing Stock of the world and they are too stupid to evaluate the depths of their own stupidity.

In order to show these Liberal Retards how far they are from understanding the Eastern Mind here are the 8 Social Sins written by Mahatma Gandhi and his grandson, Arun:

  1. Wealth without Work

  2. Pleasure without Conscience

  3. Knowledge without Character

  4. Business without Morality

  5. Science without Humanity

  6. Religion without Sacrifice

  7. Politics without Principle

  8. Rights without Responsibilities

Advertisements

BAN SHARIA, DEFINE RELIGION

defining-religion1

Congratulations, We got Donald Trump elected so now it’s on to phase 3 of the Ban Sharia Agenda started in 2014 with the participation of Atheists, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Kurds and many others from all over the world.  It would have been useless for me to mention this before now but we have successfully changed the future for the 2nd time in as many years by shifting human consciousness.

In order to get Sharia Law banned in America and the Civilized World we need President Donald J. Trump’s administration to DEFINE what constitutes a Religion.  To begin that process I will start by briefly describing what Religion is based on my research into Proto-Indo-European and the Evolution of Rational Thought through History.

The root word of “Religion” is “Lig” which is Latin for Link, so Religion is Relinking or connecting which presupposes that Religion itself is not Dogmatic but necessarily is associated with change.  Religion is also Relationship because it determines how we are connected or in Relationship with one another.

Philosophy is a conversation between Man and God’s Soul in the form of the World.  The Philosophy created is the Soul of the Man that created it. When other people adopt that Philosophy it becomes a Religion.  When they adopt that philosophy they are then in Relationship with The World and the Phenomena in the world in the same way that the original Philosopher was.

“The Soul is, in a way, Phenomena.” ~Aristotle.

Men could only get into Heaven if they had Souls, which means a Philosophy defined as a World View that was Known and not concealed and which informed the Ideas, Words, and Actions of the person that subscribed to that Belief System.  The Philosopher could falsify his philosophy by not adhering to the Praxis (Practice/Process) of the philosophy or if it was demonstrated that his philosophy was false and couldn’t create good results in the world by Describing, Prescribing, and Predicting events, Science is the Explanatory Art.  What that means is that the Philosophy had to be Rational in order to be considered a Valid Philosophy. 

The Philosophy had to presuppose a Meritocracy of some sort that didn’t create Disparate Impact and therefore wouldn’t be considered Arbitrary which is synonymous with Tyranny and therefore Irrational.  Since the only Meritocracy that doesn’t create Disparate Impact is one of Reason & Results, most philosophies claimed to worship the God of Reason.  A Meritocracy of Reason doesn’t create Disparate Impact because the difference in status is created by the Skills and Abilities of the Individual and not the Philosophy itself.  It is the only way to maximize the value created by the Philosophical Family which is Rational because it contributes to the Survival of that Religion. 

Islam, however, is not Rational because it is Arbitrary.  Instead of creating a Meritocracy of Reason & Results it creates a Meritocracy of being like Mohammed.  Women and Non-Muslims are immediately precluded from this Meritocracy.  Islam isn’t chosen it is forced upon people, they are converted on threat of death and are murdered if they attempt to leave the Fake Religion.  Non Muslims aren’t granted any status and are treated as objects lower than animals.  Therefore Islam is Arbitrary & Irrational, therefore Islam is not a Valid Philosophy, therefore Islam is not a Religion. 

Religions are Moral Systems that increase the Moral Evolution of the person who adopts the Philosophy.  Islam takes Violent, Tyrannical, Immorality, rationalizes it, and REBRANDS it as Morality. Based on the current definition of “Religion” literally anything could be turned into a religion.  I could say, Raping Children is my religion, or Cannabalism is my religion, smoking Crack Cocaine is my religion, or Torture & Murder is my religion.  While there is a Separation of Church and State there can never be a Separation from Morality and state because the General Will creates the Laws by which the State is Governed which means that the Rituals, Sacraments, & Values of the “Religion” must never Usurp the Values that come from the General Will since one is protected by and comes from the other and not the Reverse.  The Sovereign which comes from the General Will can’t and mustn’t consent to protecting Values that are directly in opposition to it’s own Existence.  That is unsustainable, suicidal, and irrational. 

Every State has an Idea/Ideal/Idol that Represents the Highest Form of the Good (God) and therefore the body of Laws which they agree to uphold and be governed by.  That Corpus of Logos/Law determines the Rights and Responsibilities of the Citizen.  It Maximizes the Freedom of the Citizen by making them more than the sum of their parts.  According to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, if people don’t willingly participate and they are unwilling to Leave, they must be forced to be free.  It must be presupposed that those moving to the United States are doing so because they have some idea of what our Values are, they embrace them, and they are willing to defend them to the death if that is necessary.

It is OK to be a Muslim in the United States of America & the Civilized World but Sharia Law is not and will never be Welcome.  Nobody should be allowed to teach or practice Sharia Law.  The Wolves always want to hide among the sheep and claim to be sheep.  Jesus was like Moses in that as a Law Giver he contributed to the Moral Evolution of the Law and separated the Violently Stupid wolves from those that followed the God of Reason. 

Since Reason is the Antithesis of Tyranny it can never be Tyrannical.  A bias towards Reason, therefore, can never by Tyrannical and the Civilized Western World must have a bias towards Reason in order to survive. 

“Republicans are afraid of Babies.” Barack Hussein Obama

pinker

My argument against Steven Pinker.

Taharrush Gamea definition.

WHAT DID I SAY?

WHAT WAS MY PREDICTION?

BAN LIBERTY.jpg

SOURCE

obama isis.png

SOURCE

But we are not well-served when, in response to a terrorist attack, we descend into fear and panic.  We don’t make good decisions if it’s based on hysteria or an exaggeration of risks . . .

…The intelligence community vets fully who they are…  … There is an entire apparatus of all of our law enforcement agencies and the center that we use for countering terrorism to check and ensure that a refugee is not admitted that might cause us harm.  ..

…They’re victims of this terrorism…

…But that’s not really what’s been going on in this debate.  When candidates say, we wouldn’t admit three-year-old orphans — that’s political posturing.  When individuals say that we should have a religious test and that only Christians — proven Christians — should be admitted — that’s offensive and contrary to American values…

…And when you start seeing individuals in positions of responsibility, suggesting that Christians are more worthy of protection than Muslims are in a war-torn land, that feeds the ISIL narrative.  It’s counterproductive, and it needs to stop. …

…But apparently, they’re scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America as part of our tradition of compassion….

I was proud, when the attacks in Boston took place…

SOURCE

Dumbo in the Jungle.png

Thought Technology

544015_457373687656376_1984152373_n (1)

(https://terminclature.wordpress.com/)

As a linguistic philosopher I spend a lot of time thinking abut what a word is. A word is like taking a lasso and throwing it around a bunch of random objects and then describing a relationship between the objects. Sentences are just longer versions of words as are paragraphs, chapters, and books. Words are embedded in a matrix called language. What a person says characterizes him, others, and the relationship between them. Modern research shows that we might actually remember things with the use of narrative. If that is the case then the character we are playing in the play that we think we are in (the story we are telling ourselves) determines what facts we remember, and how we string them together.

The mind is an association making machine. We remember things by how we associate them with other things we know. The stronger and more spontaneous the emotion the easier the association is to make and the stronger our ability too remember. Linguists like Stephen Pinker have done a good job of making it unpopular to be a linguistic determinist with their mockery and strategic rhetoric but they are only looking at how it is wrong with extreme prejudice.

One minute Pinker appears to be arguing for the Tabula Rasa and the next he is quoting Noam Chomsky to support his arguments and make himself look smart. There is no doubt that Stephen is smart but he is wrong about linguistic determinism.

I am a soft linguistic determinist. I believe taht words are thought tools. If you don’t know the word your brain can’t move in that pattern. Pinker’s arguments suggest that a child living in a Mexican barrio is as linguisticly sophisticated and as intellectually capable of making an educational contribution to the world as Ludwig Wittgenstein. Which is absurd as i will demonstrate in this book.

Barak Obama and the Liberal, Elitist, Feminist progressives are actively controlling how people think right now with their word assassination and equivocation (<span style=”text-decoration: line-through;”>TERRORIST</span> Freedom Fighter) George Orwell’s INGSOC is alive and well. Pinker’s rhetoric makes it easy to conceal the fact that female communication rituals in the form of Radical Political Correctness are being forced down the throats of Americans right now to emasculate their minds.

2-1
Many of the Neologisms and phrases that I coined and define in this book were created by me so that I could better understand how I think and so that other people could look at the world through my eyes and understand it as I do. As I was creating my psychological models and rationalizing modern psychology with the perspective of the ancient philosophers I realized that the world was becoming more and more psychopathic and this was undesirable as well as unsustainable. The only way to stop this downward spiral was for everybody to be able to recognize psychopathic strategies/narrative and be able to confront it or at least not participate with it. Imagine if we started instilling this knowledge in our children in grade school not indoctrinating them in what to think but teaching them how to think. They could pick better friends, invest in better relationships, and become better more successful people.

As a philologist and a student of Proto-indo-European. I have long been interested in what concepts and words move into what other languages and remain there, enshrined in a way, and done homage too by the people that remember and use those thought tools. Anyway, though you might not agree with me on everything I hope that as you read this book you will look through my eyes and see what I see.

The Wisdom of Yoga Explained for Atheists.

yoga patanjali

The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali are a philosophical explanation of the logical fallacies and cognitive biases that prevent the individual from being in relationship with reality.  In our life time we have a false sense of who we are reified in us through out the course of our lives.  This false sense of self is the Ego.  Life Characterizes us to our self, thus we develop a self image that is an illusion in so far as it distracts us from knowing our true inner self.  Neural myelination is created every time a pattern is repeated.  This essentially hard wires the brain into certain patterns and instincts and habits which are hard to break, and some people do not have the strength or self discipline either to be aware of themselves and the patterns the create, repeating them like a crazy person and expecting a different result.  I refer to humans as organic computers because they are much more predictable than people think.

Thrower_express_wagon

Imagine if you will that neural myelination is like a dirt road in an old west town, when it rains, mud is created, and when a carriage is drawn through the town it makes grooves in the road, the natural weight of the carriage, drops it into the grooves and the course the carriage takes is almost exactly like that of every other carriage.  This instinct prevents creativity in changing times.  It prevents people from reacting correctly to what is happening right now.  Eventually people are in relationship with a non reality because they are in relationship with the way things were or are supposed to be and not in relationship with the moment, the present.  They are, in all effect, delusional.

Some of you know that I am a linguistic philosopher.  I do subscribe somewhat to the theory of linguistic determinism.  The patterns that the vast majority of people are capable of creating are based on their vocabulary which is their thought tool set as it were.  Most people do not personally create their own patterns or break pattern without permission because Authority has been extracted from most people in order to make them civil and controllable.  Society tells us what the correct response is and the correct action is, even when people do break pattern from the social norm often times they do not do so in a beneficial or constructive way.  People that can think new thoughts, come up with new arguments, look at things in a way no one has ever looked at them before are few and far between.  The rest of humans are copy cats.  Only when they see another person create a pattern are they then able to copy that pattern, but if they had never seen it they never would have come to that action of their own accord.  This has been referred to as the acquisitively mimetic behavior of humans.

The word Yoga, is the origin of the word Yoke, which essentially means to make one.

yoke

“The light of thy body is thy eye. If thy eye be single, thy whole body will be lightsome: but if it be evil, thy body also will be darksome.” Luke 11: 34

The word here translated as single is sometimes translated as healthy, which has the connotation of whole, or holy, perfect or complete.  Some of you know that I have done a lot of work in pointing out the similarities between what Jesus taught and the ancient Saraswati cults of India.  This statement is a rhetorical tautology of the third eye chakra.

let your eye be single

10The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”

11He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 13This is why I speak to them in parables: “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand. 14In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “ ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding;  you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.  15For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears,and they have closed their eyes.  Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.’a

I am not preaching any particular branch of yoga, and I am not trying to push christianity on anybody, I am merely describing and explaining.

heal (v.)Look up heal at Dictionary.comOld English hælan “cure; save; make whole, sound and well,” from Proto-Germanic *hailjan (cognates: Old Saxon helian, Old Norse heila, Old Frisian hela, Dutch helen, German heilen, Gothic ga-hailjan “to heal, cure”), literally “to make whole” (see health). Related: Healed; healing.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=heal

holy (adj.)Look up holy at Dictionary.comOld English halig “holy, consecrated, sacred, godly,” from Proto-Germanic *hailaga- (cognates: Old Norse heilagr, Old Frisian helich “holy,” Old Saxon helag, Middle Dutch helich, Old High German heilag, German heilig, Gothic hailags “holy”). Adopted at conversion for Latin sanctus.

Primary (pre-Christian) meaning is not possible to determine, but probably it was “that must be preserved whole or intact, that cannot be transgressed or violated,” and connected with Old English hal (see health) and Old High German heil“health, happiness, good luck” (source of the German salutation Heil). Holy water was in Old English. Holy has been used as an intensifying word from 1837; used in expletives since 1880s (such as holy smoke, 1883, holy mackerel, 1876, holy cow, 1914, holy molyetc.), most of them euphemisms for holy Christ or holy Moses.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=holy

Yoga essentially means to make one, or to become whole, it is about the marriage of everything with everything, the marrying of the individual to reality, which is a rhetorical tautology of becoming one with god, which in turn means to understand and be wise and to be properly in relationship with the world around you and the people as well.  This means to be correctly in relationship with facts but more than that to have a deep and intimate and correct understanding of the very nature or reality, as god.  The Fruity Spiritualists that don’t really know what Yoga is about or even spirituality for that matter, presuppose a pleasant, non violent, superficial spouting of shibboleths and telling people what they want to hear.  Instead of waking people up to reality, which can be unpleasant, what they do instead is put them asleep to the nature of reality and indoctrinate them into a pleasantly deluded cognitive dissonance, a running away from reality and putting oneself in a trance of artificial pleasantness, this is the opposite of the intention of Yoga.

Advaita (not-two in Sanskrit) refers to the identity of the true Self, Atman, which is pure consciousness[note 3], and the highest Reality, Brahman, which is also pure consciousness.[11][note 4][note 5] Followers seek liberation/release by acquiring vidyā (knowledge)[13] of the identity of Atman and Brahman. Attaining this liberation takes a long preparation and training under the guidance of a guru. Advaita thought can also be found in non-orthodox Indian religious traditions, such as the tantric Nath tradition.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta

Vidya is vitiated knowledge.

vi·ti·ate
ˈviSHēˌāt/
verb

formal
past tense: vitiated; past participle: vitiate, spoil or impair the quality or efficiency of.”development programs have been vitiated by the rise in population destroy or impair the legal validity of.
Vitiated knowledge is partial knowledge.  I refer to them as factoids.  Some people live in a world of facts devoid of understanding or wisdom.  They know that, they don’t know why or how.  They have knowledge but that knowledge is received knowledge, which means somebody else did the work to get it and they gave it to you, but you the individual can’t actually evaluate it, you don’t know if it is correct.  You couldn’t get that information by yourself, and you don’t really understand it or how it is connected with all of the other things that you think you know.  Science is the explanatory art, a person with understanding will be able to explain something over and over in different ways to different people.  Science is predictive, descriptive, and prescriptive.  An actual human being, a wise man, is like god in these aspects being able to explain and describe and predict.  These people have been referred to as prophets, wizards, gurus, shamans, etc.
Ponder if you will the Asian and Indian Influence on early Greek philosophy and the similarity to the statements of the Buddha.

For the Epicureans[edit]

For the Epicureans, ataraxia was synonymous with the only true happiness possible for a person. It signifies the state of robust tranquility that derives from eschewing faith in an afterlife, not fearing the gods because they are distant and unconcerned with us, avoiding politics and vexatious people, surrounding oneself with trustworthy and affectionate friends and, most importantly, being an affectionate, virtuous person, worthy of trust.[citation needed]

For the Pyrrhonists[edit]

For the Pyrrhonists, given that neither the sense impressions nor the intellect, nor both combined, is a sufficient means of knowing and conveying truth, one suspends judgement on dogmatic beliefs or anything non-evident. It is from this suspension of belief ataraxia arises as one realizes one thing is ‘no more’ than that. No more up than down, no more wet than dry, no more hot than cold, no more night than day, “the number of stars one can see in the night sky is no more even than odd”, no more left than right, no more black than white as when Anaxagoras countered the notion that snow is white with the argument “Snow is frozen water, and water is black; therefore snow is also black”, etc. Most important of all, in enunciation of ‘no more’ or ‘I determine nothing’, in uttering these expressions, one is merely stating how things appear to them, at the time and in an undogmatic way, without making any assertion of truth regarding external reality.[2]

For the Stoics[edit]

The Stoics, too, sought mental tranquility, and saw ataraxia as something to be highly desired and often made use of the term, but for them the analogous state, attained by the Stoic sage, was apatheia or absence of passion.[3]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ataraxia#For_the_Pyrrhonists

IN CLOSING

From the perspective of the Ancients, Yoga was a lifetime commitment and their was no guarantee that the seeker would ever actually attain the fruit of their desire and work.  The individual is born in ignorance and may never get to the point of attaining to non vitiated knowledge, or understanding, or wisdom, but if he does he becomes a jivamukti, he becomes free in his own lifetime, reborn, free from illusion.  Having discovered the One True Self that connects us all and indwells us all the True self, Shiva.  When one comes into union (yoga) with the supreme reality, jiva becomes Shiva.  The individual self becomes, the ONE SELF.

The Advaita school holds the view that the world appearance is owing to Avidya (“ignorance”) that has the power to project i.e. to super-impose, the unreal on the real (Adhyasa), and also the power to conceal the real resulting in the delusion of the Jiva who experiences objects created by his mind and sees difference in this world, he sees difference between the atman (“the individual self”) and Brahman (“the supreme Self”). This delusion caused by ignorance is destroyed when ignorance itself is destroyed by knowledge. When all delusion is removed there remains no awareness of difference. He who sees no difference is said to be a Jivanmukta. Perception of difference leads one from death to death, non-difference can be perceived only by the highly trained intellect, so states the Sruti (Katha Upanishad II.4.11).[5]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jivanmukta#Implication

root-of-suffering-is-attachment-570x377