Tag Archives: ego

Permanent Victim Status

adam wolfe comedy

I wanted to explain how the psychopathic/female mind works when it makes superficial Aesthetic snap decisions. The female mind thinks of expanding and increasing it’s authority, it does so by usurping the authority of reason.

Now, based on my psychological models there are essentially 3 types of Authority:

Sapiential Authority— Moral Authority— Coercive Authority

These correspond to the brain in it’s 3 stages of development:

Father——-Mother——-Child

Which Correspond to:

Super Ego——Ego——Id

Now I refer to the Psychopathic mind as the Mother/Child mind.  Because psychopaths are over-coddled children, and the mind of the enabling toxic mother and the psychopathic child are comorbid with one another.  Working together to thwart reason, and steal the surplus created by the Father Principle.

The Authority of the mother exists because of the child.  Children start out as irrational emotional little creatures completely dependent on other’s for their survival.  They communicate no analytical data and only emotional data.  They are quite irrational.  But from the perspective of Mercy and Charity the Irrational Delusions of the Over Coddled Child make sense to the Mother Principle who knows that her authority comes from the existence of the child.   Since the Mother’s brain evolved to make sense of the Irrational and delusional mind of the child the emotions and desires of the child have more value or merit to her than they do to the father principle but also she is more akin to the reasoning of the Over Coddled Child than she is to that of the Father Principle or Reason which she perceives as a hostile, foreign, will.

To protect, increase, and expand her authority she must maintain the pole position preventing the relationship between reason and action.   (Coercive Authority represents not only violence/punishment or coercion but also action and survival into the future)

janus

While the Sociopathic Male brain contemplates the outside world and changes himself to make himself suitable for survival in the world.  The Psychopathic Female brain is turned away from reality and towards relationships, conversations about emotions and about people’s desires and feelings.  Because of the way the female/child brain edits their considerations sets they are ignorant of what the father (Reason) knows.  Reason, in it’s judgments, already accounts for as much Mercy and Charity as is warranted, deserved, and affordable.  Therefore the Appeal to Emotions of the Female/Child mind is also redundant and exaggerated, the female mind increases and expands her authority by usurping the Authority of Reason.

YIN AND YANG

This is easier to explain from the Chinese perspective, to explain how the Western Mind with it’s feminine bias categorizes people and therefore determines if they are deserving of Justice or Mercy.  In the Asian system, Yang-ness, Masculinity is unbroken, symbolized as an unbroken line, and Yin-ness is symbolized as a broken line.

pic1

This is how the Western Mind determines if you are worthy of Mercy, and Charity or Justice.  Failure and evil get categorized as Yin or female, and thus they are deserving of Mercy and Charity.  The Western Bias is also self loathing being suspicious of it’s own men, while at the same time reliant on them and incapable of understanding or agreeing with them because they refuse to look at what the Sociopathic Male Brains look at.  (In Joxua’s Psychological Models philosophers are “Enlightened Sociopaths”.)

The mother principle not only protects the child principle from reality, understanding, and Justice, she also protects and nurture’s it’s issues and mental diseases at the same time making the child more aggressive and narcissistic in it’s insanity.  There is a tacit prejudice in the way Mercy and Charity are abused in this perversion.  It assumes that a person or group of people are incapable of raising themselves to the same level everybody else is on, the bar for entry level.  They are incapable of being equal to everybody else under a meritocracy of reason and so they need to be admitted any way and given a handicap to compensate for their natural state of constant failure and ineptitude cause by the over coddling of the mother, but her authority is still intact because the over coddled child is still under her authority and dependent on it.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE PERMANENT VICTIM

If you study the psychology and the behavior of the permanent victim it is really quite interesting.  Permanent Victims have at the same time an inferiority complex and a superiority complex.   From their perspective they are superior because they are inferior, their over-coddling mother taught them that they win by failing, this isn’t necessarily expressed overtly but through the incentives and the sequences of events this concept is instilled in the child.  People copy whatever behaviors they see succeeding because they are Acquisitively Mimetic, people are not innately Analytical Philosophers who introspect to see if something is just.  People just want what they want and if they always get what they want they have no reason to give pause.

Now, the permanent victim feels that everything that happens to them happens to them because of their issue, whatever that might be.  “This is happening to me because I am a woman, this is happening to me because I am black.”  Whenever they don’t get everything they want they claim to be victimized because of their issue and invoke the Mother principle of Mercy and Charity.  At the same time, it has been instilled in them, that because their issues are protected they can act as the judge, jury, and executioner on their own behalf, championing themselves and defending themselves vociferously in their delusion and error.

THE SOLUTION

When I started my fiction endeavor,(https://shivastus.wordpress.com/) to reintroduce Wisdom into the literature of the world, I created a civilization known as the Zed, because they were the last civilization before the earth collapsed into anarchy.  One of the tenets of that civilization is that if you are found to be lacking, if you are incapable of contributing more of a surplus than you consume or if you commit a major infraction of the rules, if someone speaks out in your favor for mercy or charity on your part, in disagreement with every body else, then they are responsible for your failure and your fate.  Which means they rely on your resources, not those of society, and if they re-offend you get the same punishment that they do.

The most egregious abuse of Mercy and Charity almost always involves taking the surplus of those who have earned it and squandering it on those who have proven they don’t deserve it.  This is an act of theft and a sabotage of society, it punishes success and rewards failure.  And all to often those asking for Mercy and Charity on the part of others risk no personal financial loss or damage to their reputation, or the need to accomplish the outcome which they guaranteed would be the end.  This pattern in society exactly mimics my psychological models.

When nobody in society takes responsibility for their actions and results, you don’t have a society.

Advertisements

Emotional Morbidity and Psychopathology

Anger

Now the difference between the Psychopath and a rational or  sane person is that the Psychopath acts out of emotional morbidity.  I created Shared State Theory of Communication in part because I was observing two things, the fact that I was aware of the fact that I was changing states, emotional states and the way I was in relationship with people, the world, facts,  and events.  While every time I would communicate that I had changed states I noticed that almost everybody else would change the way they were in relationship with me and the relationship either without knowing, or without communicating that something had changed.

Whereas I was able to be self aware, self conscious, and self controlled, these appeared to be intelligences that others did not possess in the same proportions or at all.  I was constantly the victim of this unconscious changing of states, some of the time it was strategic, subversive, or passive aggressive.  I was the first to get screwed.  Instead of being considered a virtue, people seemed to consider being self aware a form of sorcery of which they were suspicious.  Baba Muktananda had always mentioned how he studied people that were successful and people that failed.  I found this interesting as well, how over and over again I was the first person to get sold down the river, not because I was wrong, or bad at my job, but because people feared my knowledge, insight, and ability.  They didn’t want to compete with me on a level playing field because they were afraid of how they would look in comparison to me, and they would have been right, given a chance I would have made them look like they were moving backwards in time.  This is also a clue to why we as a country and a world are in the state of affairs that we are in.  No money in the economy, cleptocracy in the banks and stockmarket, propaganda in the media, puppets in the government.

Knowing that I was in an emotionally morbid state I wouldn’t make decisions or act.  Psychopaths on the other hand only act on their issues, and out of emotionally morbid states.  They don’t take responsibility for their issues or their emotions, as far as they are concerned, everybody else is responsible for their emotions and their emotions are responsible for their behavior.  So a psychopath will throw an histrionic fit, and it is your fault, because you attacked them by existing and them being aware of your existence.

q

Histrionic psychopaths keep their pain fresh, like an open wound, and they use it as a source of power, they are consciously looking for things to get offended by and they think they win be getting offended.  Then when they have an opportunity they loose their venom on somebody that they are projecting their damage onto.

We now know that Anger comes from feelings of frustration, according to my SSTOC people are always communicating whatever state they are in, even if they are concealing that state, they are probably still leaking that state.  A person that feels thwarted will communicate thwartedness, unjustly thwarting others that don’t deserve it.  In an environment in which people are not educated knowing psychology, America, and not encouraged to be mentally healthy, what we see now is a creeping normalcy.  People are acquisitively mimetic, and they copy behaviors they see.  Monkey see monkey do, ad nauseum.  I refer to it as the tragedy of the commons in regard to strategic behavior.

The problem with modern psychology is that it is normative, which means that it compares the individual to the normal person in society which presupposes that the society itself isn’t batshit insane.  Which as it happens right now, is the case.  This also means that people that are quite rational will be singled out, and considered insane, because the crazy society has to be protected from the sane individuals that every day see the decay of the form of the good.

As part of my theory of rational relationship, a person should communicate in a timely manner if their behavior has been modified from what is rational or expected or necessary so that the other person can respond or change their mind or plan.  This maximizes the value in a rational relationship.  If you don’t communicate correctly, you do not think correctly and you do not act correctly which means the end result will be bad.  All force is a subtle form of rape.

Some of you know my theory on how philosophy and religion came to the west from India through Greece and for those of you this word will be meaningful.

auspicious (adj.) Look up auspicious at Dictionary.com1590s, “of good omen” (implied in auspiciously), from Latin auspicium “divination by observing the flight of birds,” from auspex (genitive auspicis) + -ous. Related:Auspiciouslyauspiciousness.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=auspicious

Etymology[edit]

From auspice +‎ -ious, from Latin auspicium (augury), from Latin auspex (augur), possibly via French.

  1. Of good omen; indicating future success.
  2. Conducive to success.
    This is an auspicious day.
  3. Marked by successprosperous.

Ask yourself these questions:  What stimulated my need recognition?  What are my intentions?  What is my motivation?  What is my desire?  What is my end game?  What is my desired result? 

Things end as they begin, and nothing ends well that is motivated by negative emotions.

fgo

Id Ego and Super Ego in Richard Dawkins

Image

 

 I am going to describe how I use my methods to construct details psychological profiles of people.  In every human psyche there are the son, the mother, and the father.  

The id is the persons issues, and delusions their diseases mental and emotional.  Children are born being delusional and incapable of dealing with reality or the truth in it’s uncorrupted form.  For this reason the mother exists, the existence of the child validates the authority of the mother who protects the child from reality but she also protects the child’s mental and emotional diseases as well.  As the child reaches the end of the mother’s authority the child comes under the authority of the father, who prepares the child to be a functional part of the world, removing the mental and emotional diseases from the child.  

Image

Now what happened with Dawkin’s and what happens with Psychopaths is that they refuse the last stage of evolution, the neural myelination of the frontal lobe that governs right and wrong and relationship.  He clings to ego because he clings to the disease. He is a histrionic psychopath.  He clings to the frame that he was victimized by religion, and he invites other people not only to also feel victimized by religion but to champion his cause.  It is really fascinating observing how strategic psychopaths can be and how much time and energy they will spend devising plans to manipulate people so that they can feel that their issues are correct.  What are his issues?  (https://psykolinguist.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/richard-dawkins-deconstructed-by-the-mindhacker/)

Now with histrionic psychopaths they use their damage or perceived damage in this case as a source of power and energy, they keep that ball of morbid emotion alive and seething.  Now what is interesting is that the psychopath can’t appear to be the instigator, they have to appear to be the victim.  Why is he damaged?  Because he was shamed for his sexual inclinations or orientation, (read the link, I am not re-explaining myself).  According to his perspective he was molested by being shamed, but not harmed by being molested, and he resents the shaming, which is why he tries to humiliate and ridicule religious people.  According to shared state theory of communication, a person communicates whatever state they are in.  To my knowledge Dawkins has not yet described the shaming and I will explain why, he says he was not “permanently damaged” by the sexual contact with his teacher.  What I know is that her feels he was permanently harmed by the shaming.  Now what is interesting is that If he told us why he was shamed, and how he actually feels, SOCIETY would reject his ideas and perspective, because what he actually feels is socially unacceptable, which is why he is concealing it and also why the repression continues and also why he is permanently wounded, and he blames religiosity for it.  

Now the sum of a psychopath’s actions have to take them towards doing their will.  So in the form of the conquest they repeat you can see what they are trying to do or undo.  Dawkins is trying to create an environment and a world where what he really wants can be indulged.  As I have shown in the other article he is creating an environment for children where they can learn and be exposed to the casual contempt of others for religion, this is evidenced by the material I have gleaned from observing dawkinite trolls on this blog (http://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/).  

Now you have the cause of the good and the cause of the bad, which makes in the person’s narrative the form of the good or their god and the form of the bad, which is the opposite of their highest good.  As I have demonstrated in Dawkin’s narrative, he frames himself as the victim of religiosity, that was the first cause, the teleological error, not that his sexual inclinations are frowned upon and socially unacceptable today, by our standards, but he feels molested by having been instilled with sense of shame at something that is now socially unacceptable.  So from his perspective and in his narrative, his personal mental association with (sexual arousal, science, education) is the form of the good and very much associated with his personal happiness and his sense of self.  If you look at my plasticity of the sense of self theory you know we automatically and unconsciously expand and retract our sense of self in a way that appears arbitrary but is not.  What is the form of his conquest? (fagging, the humiliation of inferiors or the opposite of the form of the good), and what is the form of the bad?  (religiosity, shame, moral authority)  remember Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.  

It is amazing to me how people can choose to stay in relationship with the disease and protect the disease and even nurture the disease.  Psychopaths are so good at manipulating other people while concealing who they are.  They act harmless, like victims and bypass everyone’s threat filter.  I HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED!  YOU HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED!  WE ARE BEING VICTIMIZED!  WE MUST TURN THE TIDE ON OUR ABUSERS!  GRAB YOUR PITCHFORKS AND YOUR TORCHES AND YOUR NOOSES AND FOLLOW ME TO THE INTERWEBZ!  So he gets people to extend their sense of self to him and his issues, concealing what is really going on.  And once everybody is facing the “enemy” and attacking the enemy, then he reveals his real self.  

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly tyrants rise to power and with the aid of everyone around them.  I have often thought that the tyrant is a reflection of the people that worship him, and if you remove the tyrant they will replace him with the exact same type of tyrant.  This was recently confirmed for me with the democratic elections in the Muslim worlds.  

Image

 

 

Male and Female Minds Revisited

Image

I am going to revisit my theory on male and female brains to practice my explanation of it.  Science after all is the explanatory art.  

Image

-Wikipedia

Super-ego[edit]

The superego (GermanÜber-Ich)[26] reflects the internalization of cultural rules, mainly taught by parents applying their guidance and influence.[8] Freud developed his concept of the super-ego from an earlier combination of the ego ideal and the “special psychical agency which performs the task of seeing that narcissistic satisfaction from the ego ideal is ensured … what we call our ‘conscience’.”[27] For him “the installation of the super-ego can be described as a successful instance of identification with the parental agency,” while as development proceeds “the super-ego also takes on the influence of those who have stepped into the place of parents — educators, teachers, people chosen as ideal models.”[28]

…also known as growing the fuck up. 

The existence of id consolidates the authority of Ego, in the absence of Id the ego will be sympathetic with it’s own desires and try to get super-ego to participate with it, which is the sole purpose of ego, and exactly the opposite of what Super ego wants, it directly antagonizes the will of super ego.  When I was studying male and female communication rituals my obscene abilities of pattern recognition were able to pick up on the patterns of the female brain and the way it is in relationship with the male brain.  This creates emergent properties in society and the world.  The 1 on 1 relationships create the norm, and people being aquisitively mimetic copy what they have seen.  This unconscious process, these unconscious relationships and patterns create a normative bias that creates disparate impact in favor of feminine judgments or ego.  Not only are the outcropping patterns bad they are dangerous and unsustainable.  

Image

Female authority comes from usurping, blaming, guilting, shaming, and humiliating masculine authority.  Women do not see reason as their own will, they see it as a foreign invasive will, because they edit their consideration set to think sentimentally and emotionally not analytically or logically.  They don’t think about the ugly things that are going on in the world they think about the pretty things that would be pleasant if they were true.  The female mind ignores threats, and is naturally hostile to the masculine narrative which is to say they don’t listen to men with the same eagerness that they listen to other women and to their own emotions.  The female mind uses mercy and charity to expand her authority and to appear a moral superior to reason.  The male narrative is democratic, bold, offensive, truthful, easy to understand because it isn’t vague.  The female narrative tries to shut the male narrative up by presupposing a meritocracy of pleasantness where being pleasant is a virtue and you can’t speak your truth plainly and boldly.  The meritocracy of pleasantness thwarts the meritocracy of reason and prevents participation of the best with the best.  The female mind thinks it wins by getting offended even if it throws itself in the way to get offended for someone else, once offended the female mind presupposes it’s own moral authority to judge and punish.  

Parrhesia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In rhetoricparrhesia is a figure of speech described as: to speak candidly or to ask forgiveness for so speaking.[1] The term is borrowed from the Greek παρρησία (πᾶν “all” + ῥῆσις / ῥῆμα “utterance, speech”) meaning literally “to speak everything” and by extension “to speak freely,” “to speak boldly,” or “boldness.” It implies not only freedom of speech, but the obligation to speak the truth for the common good, even at personal risk.

An example of this is the quote “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat” by Winston Churchill.[2]

Image

My term “Superficial Aesthetic Snap Decisions”  are the tacit judgments made by the uneducated female mind without understanding.  (http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/superficial-aesthetic-snap-decisions/) The uneducated mind is easily offended thinking  that everything in the brief, pleasant span of its short life has prepared it to judge everything that goes on from it’s own narrow-minded opinion.  It is essentially operating tacitly on a dynamic tautology of argument from ignorance. 

Argument from ignorance (Latinargumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance stands for “lack of evidence to the contrary”), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false. Nor does it allow the admission that the choices may in fact not be two (true or false), but may be as many as four, (1) true, (2) false, (3) unknown between true or false, and (4) being unknowable (among the first three).[2] In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used to shift the burden of proof. -wikipedia

Image

Let me see if I can explain this another way.  We have all of this technology in America, google +, facebook, wordpress, etc. many people think that they are experts on how the internet works.  This is called epistemic arrogance.  Over valuing what you know and undervaluing what you don’t know.  It is very good for making you feel good about yourself but it is very bad for knowing the threats that are coming at you.  That feeling goodness, prevents you from understanding the nature of the enemy that hates you and wants to eradicate you off the face of the planet.  That positive emotional female crap, is a liability, it makes you weak, slow, and unprepared.  

Image

The Deep Web (also called the Deepnet,[1] Invisible Web,[2] or Hidden Web[3]) is World Wide Web content that is not part of the Surface Web, which is indexed by standardsearch engines. It should not be confused with the dark Internet, the computers that can no longer be reached via the Internet, or with a Darknet distributed filesharing network, which could be classified as a smaller part of the Deep Web. There is concern that the deep web can be used for serious criminal activity.[4]

Mike Bergman, founder of BrightPlanet and credited with coining the phrase,[5] said that searching on the Internet today can be compared to dragging a net across the surface of the ocean: a great deal may be caught in the net, but there is a wealth of information that is deep and therefore missed.[6] Most of the Web’s information is buried far down on dynamically generated sites, and standard search engines do not find it. Traditional search engines cannot “see” or retrieve content in the deep Web—those pages do not exist until they are created dynamically as the result of a specific search. As of 2001, the deep Web was several orders of magnitude larger than the surface Web.[7]

Image

thank you iconographic art of joxua mourningstar 

 

This is a photoshop I did of Nishkala shiva, and Sikala Shiva, an ancient Indian metaphor for the nature of the mind. Sikala Shiva is in corpse pose but still alive, although in a dormant state, he represents the subconscious mind, many orders of magnitude greater than the conscious mind represented by Shakti.  Below him is Niskala Shiva in his dead form representing the unconscious mind, many orders of magnitude greater than the subconscious mind. 

Image