Tag Archives: comedy

Bill Maher, House Ginger

HOUSE GINGER.png

I have lost all respect for Bill Maher.  For decades telling an N-word joke that made black people laugh has been the Holy Grail of stand up comedy.  If you did that you had bridged the gap.  You were accepted as one of them.  I remember when I was doing stand up comedy only black men would laugh at my jokes while white women shook their heads in disgust.  I thought Bill Maher’s joke was funny.  The only thing that offended me was his apology. 

If you watch the show observe how many times Bill Maher angrily bangs his hands together.  If you know my background in profiling, security, and psychology this body language is correlated with a person who is about to fight.  While he is angry at himself he is projecting his frustration onto Donald Trump.  Narcissistically, Bill Maher conceives of himself as the front line in the assault on the President.  If I were him, in my defense, I would have said, “I thought black people would think of me as one of themselves when I told that joke.” 

It was Bill Maher who I first heard use the term, “the soft bigotry of low expectation”.  Meaning: those people can never get on our level because they are two inferior so they have to be held to a lower standard.  They aren’t like us.  They will never be like us.  

What I find repulsive is the fact that Bill Maher has buckled and bowed down to the false god of Political Correctness.  He looked genuinely distraught and he even brought two other cronies on his show to kick his own ass, a phony Christian, Michael Eric Dyson who I assume was named after the excellent vacuum and a mediocre rapper whom I have never wanted to imitate at karaoke, Ice Cube. 

It was offensive to real black people and every reasonable human being to hear Michael Eric Dyson talk seriously about reparations.  Show me anywhere in the world wear black people have a better life than in the United States.  I don’t agree with slavery.  But Modern black people are not THOSE people and I am not a slave owner.  This is not that point in time. 

Ice Cube looked like a sad, angry, little man.  Frankly, he looked like an angry diabetic who is suffering from heart failure.  Did you see how weak his shoulders looked?  As good as his life has been you’d think he would be more grateful.  Pathetic, impotent, little man, still acting hard.  So, sad. 

One last thing, white people didn’t name Niger or Nigeria.  This stupid fallacy has been promoted by Bill Maher and Jon Stewart.  It is a stupid and evil argument.  

The name Nigeria was taken from the Niger River running through the country. This name was coined in the late 19th century by British journalist Flora Shaw, who later married Lord Lugard, a British colonial administrator. The origin of the name Niger, which originally applied only to the middle reaches of the Niger River, is uncertain. The word is likely an alteration of the Tuareg name egerew n-igerewen used by inhabitants along the middle reaches of the river around Timbuktu prior to 19th-century European colonialism.[27][28]  (SOURCE)

Negus (Ge’ez: ነጉሥ?, nəgūś IPA: [nɨguːɬ]; Amharic: nigūs?; cf. Tigrinya: ነጋሲ? negus) is a royal title in the Ethiopian Semitic languages.[1] It denotes a monarch,[2] such as the Bahri Negus (Lord of the Seas) of the Medri Bahri kingdom in pre-1890 Eritrea, and the Negus in pre-1974 Ethiopia(SOURCE)

 

From Who’s Perspective is Ben Carson Wrong?

BEN1

I wanted to point something out in this most recent attack on Ben Carson.  This fake mock outrage about his comments.  The presupposition is that he said something wrong.  It is wrong because it was insensitive, this presupposes a tacit emotional appeal.  What is concealed is this:  From the perspective of those for whom what he said was wrong, What is the solution???  What is the correct answer??? In order to have the authority to say that he is wrong you have to know what the solution is otherwise you don’t have the authority to insinuate that he is wrong.  The funny thing is it isn’t even really stated that he is wrong, their is just this stupid mock outrage that other people mimic.
Deborah Tannen the Linguistic philosopher created the science on Male & female communication rituals.  They have a joke about the different way that men and women think and communicate:
A husband and wife are in bed.  She says, “boy I am really thirsty right now.”  He says, “Ok, I will get you a glass of water.”  She protests, “HONEY!!!”  He pauses and gets back into bed remembering his training on how women communicate, that they don’t want the solution they actually want to know that you feel the same way they do.  He says, “I’m sorry, Sweety, I remember this time when I was really thirsty too.”
The hidden subject is that Ben is considered wrong because like a man he thinks in term of the solution to the problem instead of sharing the feminine, victimized, emotional state.  He is suggesting tacitly that we as a Nation need to be more masculine and more about the solution.  This is yet another example of how the Feminine Bias of the Western mind is being manipulated by Liberal Progressives and Democrats.  It is conscious, strategic, and intentional.

ben3

Open Letter to Jon Stewart. GOOD BYE!!! :)))

jon

Jon, I have watched your show, religiously, for years and enjoyed it.  You were always smarter than average and I valued your opinion.  But recently things have changed.  I know that you were encouraged when you were young to hob knob with the Hoi polloi but you, unlike myself, always had the option of going back to your parents, their connections, and their resources.  I didn’t have that option.  My success wouldn’t be determined by any connections or alliances that existed before my birth, in fact my parents not only didn’t have any connections they didn’t particularly like me. (https://usaguru.wordpress.com)  You were born on the other side of the finish line with a silver spoon in your ass, you woke up from a lovely dream in which you were eating chocolate ice cream and you thought you had won the race.  I know you think you are the cool honky.  I know you think you are down with people’s issues, I know you did some landscape maintenance.  My father, my uncle, my sister, and mother, two of my uncles and my cousin all worked landscape maintenance, as a matter of fact most of the Jehovah’s Witness congregation in Phoenix that I attended worked in Landscape Maintenance and were forced to compete with illegal aliens that would steal your equipment, and under bid you and weren’t insured.

untitled

SOMETIME I JUST WANT TO KICK YOU IN YOUR SHMUSHKA

You think like a woman, Jon.  Men think about the world, the polis, women think about the home, the oikos, look up the etymology of the word economy.  You remind me of all of those Jewish people who think they are studying kabbalah, but keep on getting told to work on the path workings, that is a rhetorical tautology of being humble.  Humility, however, will only get you so far.  Humility in the face of evil is cowardice.  You think that if we just get everything right in the united states the entire world will fix itself.  You couldn’t be more wrong.  And what you aren’t considering is that maybe we can’t afford not to be a major player on the global scene.  Jon, how did radical pacifism work out for the Jews in WWIII?  How did it work out for the Tibetan Buddhists?  When you just hope that everybody will be reasonable if you are reasonable, how does that work?  When you hope that a psychopath will protect you from himself, how does that work?  When you trust that a psychopath is telling you the truth, how does that work out?

mishling

Let me tell you a little history, Anton Szander Levay, a Jew, said that WWII was started by self-loathing Jews.  He was correct.  Adolf Hitler was most likely half Jewish.  The entire Vienna Circle, and even Einstein, originally wrote negative comments about the Jewish religion.  They were probably trying to get the Jews to integrate into society more or better by humiliating their religious identity.  But what it did was empower Hitler.


If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.

Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands.

Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.”  Mein Kampf, end of chapter II. 


einstein

You seem to think, Jon, that because FOX news has what you perceive as a Right spin, you are setting matters straight with your Left spin.  And in this way you perceive yourself as a champion of the good.  I want you to take responsibility for your words.  I don’t think you are as smart as you think you are, I also don’t think your audience is as smart as they think they are.  You are using ethos, pathos, and logos irresponsibly.

auto-rene-descartes-quote-303304

You are not a news organization, you are a comedy satire.  In this way you are kind of an intellectual coward.  In order to say that FOX is a fake new channel you have to have the authority to say that.  You are affirming the concealed presupposition which you don’t have the courage to state overtly.  What FOX does, and you don’t seem to comprehend, because you are too stupid, is inquiry.  They are concerned, as they should be.  They are advocates, Add voices.  While you, and this is what I despise about psychopaths, presuppose your moral authority, as all toxic parent figures do, to conceal, manipulate, lie, and to make decisions for others, to judge and to punish.  You try to control who is allowed in the conversation and what they can say.  You want to control the direction of the conversation and the conclusion that is reached, which is to say a person can be considered wrong because of their conclusion.  Apologize for your own dick, Jon, don’t apologize for my dick.  Don’t argue that I should give away resources that I don’t have to people that hate me, harass me at work, and despise America.  Have you ever been beaten up?  Have you ever had a hit put out on you?  I have.  Jon, if you want to protect and provide for all of these people do it with your resources, and tie your fate to theirs.  What that means is that you are partially responsible for their crimes, and their debts.  You can be their patron, and share their fate.

RIGHT SPIN<<<+>>> LEFT SPIN

618653563_3952df0e12_b


history (n.) Look up history at Dictionary.comlate 14c., “relation of incidents” (true or false), from Old French estoire, estorie “chronicle, history, story” (12c., Modern French histoire), from Latin historia “narrative of past events, account, tale, story,” from Greek historia “a learning or knowing by inquiry; an account of one’s inquiries, history, record, narrative,” from historein “inquire,” from histor “wise man, judge,” from PIE *wid-tor-, from root *weid- “to know,” literally “to see” (see vision).  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=history


I voted for Obama twice, partly because of you, and partly because he was misrepresented.  He is showing his true colors now.  Tell me, Jon, when you go to the Freemason Lodges in New York are you scared by all of those angry NOI guys that are Freemasons?  Do they intimidate you into using the narrative that you use?  Jon, the Western mind has a Feminine bias.  You appear to think that bias is correct and is reality.  The Eastern mind doesn’t have that problem.  The Eastern mind not only understands the Western mind it knows how to game it.  You are being gamed, Jon.  Obama and Islam know that women are more susceptible to trauma based mind control than are men.  They know that if there is an extinction level event, or the grid is hacked, or their is an electro-magnetic pulse, or anything like that Islam will immediately institute sharia law and become a warring cult.  They will steal all possessions that they desire, kill anybody that doesn’t convert, they will rape who they want to rape, and take young females as war booty.  Obama is intentionally stacking the deck in favor of Islam globally.  He is making secret back door deals and deciding what is good for the American people in private without their knowledge or consent.  You should be much more suspicious of him than you are.  The Muslim Brotherhood was invited as guests to America.  Right now they are recruiting people out of mosques for violent crimes.

illuminatium

You know better than most people, Jon, that the Jewish Liberal Media is there to manipulate what people see.  If you can control the Audio and the Visual, if you can control what people see and hear, you can control what they think, say, and do.  The human brain doesn’t distinguish between what it sees on television or in reality.  Repetition communicates normalcy and because of the normative human bias, what is normal is considered correct and good.  So they show images that portray white father figures as fat, stupid, out of touch, bigots.  And they portray black men and white women in relationships.  Your propaganda tacitly conflates all white people with all white people and all black people with all black people and all women with all women and all men with all men.  In order to manipulate people you need a stupid society that doesn’t know the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.

will ferrell jon stewart final

You hate the Congress and the Senate.  I suspect like Obama you are complicit in wanting to destroy them.  What that does is make Obama a dictator.  You want to collapse the state government, essentially, you think that people aren’t smart enough to make decisions for themselves and you Arrogantly think that you and your ilk are so much smarter than everybody else with your Aristocratic, Oligarchic, Secret Societies.  That is why you hate the Senators and Congressman, and Republicans so much.

jon stewart

Telling the Truth Falsely.

jimmy kimmel

The idea that he is somehow Kenyan has more or less been debunked, so what he is doing here is conflating the other two issues with the first one.  It is a subtle way of making the Fundamental Attribution Error by tacitly conflating the other two issues with the first one.  It operates on a cognitive bias that people have, thinking in terms of essences and associating the Wrongness of his being Kenyan-born with the issues of whether he is a socialist, marxist, or is lying about his being a Muslim as the provisions Taqiyya and Kitman allow for a Muslim in politics to do.  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error)

 In his book Telling Lies Paul Ekman goes deep into the psychology of pathological liars, showing the techniques that they use for lying.

The merit of this technique is that Obama doesn’t have to address the subject, twice before he slipped and said he was a Muslim once when asked about his religion and another time when giving a speech.  He has never been directly asked if he was a Socialist.  All Obama had to do was come out and act calm and happy, which is easy for him because he is a very skilled liar.

obama-communist-socialism-marxism-communism-politics-1382437512

(https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/obama-hates-america-open-letter-to-larry-wilmore/)

It is a coordinated deflection designed to keep the pressure of Obama and to repair his wounded reputation.


DEFLECTION

A defence mechanism is a coping technique that reduces anxiety arising from unacceptable or potentially harmful impulses.[1] Defence mechanisms are unconscious and are not to be confused with conscious coping strategies.[2]Sigmund Freud was one of the first proponents of this construct.[3]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_mechanisms

“Deflection is a method of changing a subject that is or might be painful.”

Commonest methods of deflection are:

  1. Humor
  2. Anger

These are the two of the most common methods of deflecting people away from difficult subjects.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Stress-related_Disorders/Defenses#Deflection:


It is already obvious to me that someone is coaching Obama in how to not leak emotions that would clue people in to the fact that he is lying or concealing.  You can see this when he is slow talking or talking in a monotone, controlling the emotions that he is communicating.

Troll is a language.

frog

 People will bristle at this concept.  I am a linguistic philosopher so you can take my word for it or not but history will prove me correct.  Troll is becoming the lingua-franca of comedy, if it isn’t already.

I have studied troll behavior ever since Myspace had group and philosophy functions.  On Facebook I became such a successful troll, even though that wasn’t my intent, people crowned me the king of Fight Club.  A group in which all of the old school trolls from Myspace came together to troll each other.  I was more interested in positive, rational, mutually beneficial relationships on the internet but at the time, especially with the people I was associated with, that wasn’t an option.  I didn’t start out trolling, it became necessary to defend myself as it appeared everyone was a troll and was always trolling.

Years before, when I lived in Seattle Washington, I had been a stand up comedian, so I started using those skills to troll people.  I would also use debate, which I became quite good at.  I eventually could beat almost anybody in trolling or debate, some people would pop and lock between trolling and being rational looking for any sense of victory.  On Facebook I trolled entire groups of trolls off the internet and developed a technique and even a psychology for doing so.  You can view some of my handy work here (https://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/).

Several years ago I observed as the comedians on the television, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Bill Maher started using troll humor, this was very disconcerting as they were also using jokes I had written years before.  One joke Bill Maher used that I had written on Myspace was, “My dick is 8 inches long if I start measuring from my b-hole.”  You would understand how this joke could get to him if you understood the nature of trolling, people are acquisitively mimetic, which is to say the copy behaviors they see being rewarded or if they see something that looks awesome they will repeat it because they believe it increases their perceived value.

I decided that since I was such a successful troll I would get back into stand up comedy.  I went to a comedy dinner theater in Tustin and observed several comedians.  None of them ever found the room.  They were all telling troll jokes poorly, making constant references to the internet, social networking sites, and devices.  It was beyond lame.  I went to several open mike nights and performed I was relatively well received by the audience.  I went to the best open mike forums and pretty much killed it at one of them I got a standing ovation, clients were chanting Wolfe! Wolfe! Wolfe!  and then they started Howling.

 My comedy is transgressively sacral which is to say, calculated to be offensive, I believe that comedians have a responsibility to defend freedom of speech and to get people to loosen up about their issues.  This generation of comedians is terrible.  They have thrown the standard into the muck and mire in worship of the false idol of political correctness.  While I get along with audiences other comedians hate me, I am not typical, I am not fat, ugly, insecure, or any of the things most comedians are, because of this they hate me.  Comedians are cliquish and petty, they feel that awesomeness is a finite resource and if one is being too awesome or they feel they can’t compete they turn to their clicks and gang up on you.  This is what had always happened to me.

ONCE A TROLL ALWAYS A TROLL

I returned to trolling with a vengeance.  If I couldn’t express myself on the stage, I would use my trolling skill and turn my jokes into photoshops with time stamps.  I would get to the punchline first.  This was my troll the world strategy.  I realized on Facebook that I was wasting my talent trolling trolls, I should be going after bigger game.  The thing was people weren’t afraid that I would fail, they were afraid I would succeed, which is why they not only didn’t give me a chance they antagonized me, undermined me, lied about me, and ganged up on me.  I could handle that but it wasn’t worth the little that I got from being in clubs.  I didn’t troll people just because I didn’t like them I trolled them because they were doing something reprehensible or poorly motivated, I trolled psychopaths, and I had an uncanny ability to spot them.  Psychopaths have a certain Modus operandi.

Trolling is a language that has a hierarchy, and one communicates through, not only strategic communication but also through strategic behavior.

TROLL HIERARCHY

  1. Debate troll, the highest form of troll establishes moral and sapiential dominance over his competitor.  This troll can beat you in a rational debate.
  2. Butthurt troll, the butthurt troll can say the worst possible thing and the worst possible time.  He will have some people Rolling on the Floor Lauging their Asses off.  While other people sit their whining that he did something mean or immoral.
  3. The Photoshop troll makes humorous to offensive photoshops using your image or images that you resonate with and project your sense of self onto, he makes fun of your issues.
  4. Snark and Sarcasm, the beta troll is passive aggressive, not being able to actually establish dominance but is just annoying and emotionally abusive, they don’t teach you anything, they just waist your time and communicate negative emotional data.
  5. Histrionic trolls type in all caps, and use repeated question marks and exclamation points (???) (!!!)
  6. Lurker, the lurker is a creeper troll that looks at all of your information and possibly steals your photo or gets information on you to use against you.  Lurkers have different levels of skill.
  7. Report Fa6, the lowest form of troll is the Report Fa6, they can’t do any kind of trolling well, and are in a constant state of butthurt feeling attacked and offended by everyone else’s awesomeness, so they just report everything you do and say until your account gets deleted.  This is the lowest form of troll because they hate freedom of speech.  Bryan Khemraj Shastri Carpen is the Worst of the Worst of Report Fa6s, he doesn’t just report you with his main profile, he makes multiple sock accounts and reports you from all of them.  He stays in groups where nobody likes him and reports everybody that comes after him.  After the Trollocaust in Fight Club I stopped going on FB because it had become a meritocracy of Butthurt and report fa66otry.  The mistake most new fa6z make is they say essentially this HA HA HA HA!!!!  I AM LAUGHING AT YOU, YOU ARE SO STUPID.  But a genuinely skilled troll will make everybody else laugh at you.  I was getting 40 – 50 likes instantly on my photoshops.  Carpen reported so frequently that facebook didn’t just delete my photoshops they deleted my profile and the profiles of anybody that had clicked like.  To this day the lamer Carpen still hangs out in Fight Club claiming to be the new king.  Everybody else pretty much left the group and he claimed that it was because he wasn’t posting that much in their anymore.  But nobody wants to interact with a known butthurt, report fa6.  (https://trollfiles.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/my-epic-victory-over-bryan-kemraj-shastri-carpen/)

weirdcar_1-1

The Question, the Feminine Part of Communication.

the_riddler_by_kikimj-d5wuwqu(http://kikimj.deviantart.com/art/The-Riddler-357520710)

One of the recurring themes that I discuss with my student, Psychic medium and elder Shaman Patrick John Coleman, is the use of the question in modern conversation.  I noticed in my piece, about a year ago, that with my almost autistic level of sensitivity to communication that the vast majority of communication isn’t solution oriented but instead revolves around the problem itself, and isn’t designed to approach or recognize the solution. (https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/09/07/problem-centric-narrative-definition/) We are going to discuss an aspect of how that comes to happen.

quexclamation

When I say that Questions are female I am suggesting that they are empty, they are aware of the lack of some presence in the form of the solution or some knowledge or expertise.  Now based on my psycholinguistic models, the conversation is the relationship and everything that happens in relationship leaves a trace in communication, so if society in general is failing at relationship this will be evidenced in the narrative and the conversations that people have.

shivastus

When a person refuses to ask a question why to they do that?  Because they don’t want to acknowledge that someone knows something they don’t, or has authority on a subject they don’t.

When a person makes an accusation or an insinuation instead of asking a question, what does that reveal about the person speaking?  It reveals that they are emotionally morbid and they are trying to increase their value by getting what they want while at the same time impugning the character and demeaning the person from which they are attempting to extract the vital information.  It is illogical to answer an accusation, so I make sure that I never respond to this behavior the way the person engaging in this behavior expects.  I never respond by giving them something of value, I give them counter intel or I expose their strategy.  It isn’t an equitable interaction because they are trying to get something with something that has negative value.  Unfortunately, this strategy succeeds all too often.

When a person asks a Sarcastic or leading question, what does that reveal about the person?  Often times Sarcasm is a form of bet hedging, where a person can say they were serious if they turn out to be correct and if they turn out to be wrong they can say that they were just kidding.  This is a very toxic form of communication.  My room mate always tells me, “There is always a little truth to joking.”  Too which I respond, “No, be serious when you are being serious and joke when you are joking.”  Although, there are some instances when all a person can do is be sarcastic because they are dealing with a tyrant and overt criticism isn’t acceptable.  When a person asks leading questions, that aren’t legitimate, they are often trying to get you to turn your scrutiny back on yourself.  This is only valid on people that don’t scrutinize themselves, discipline themselves and control themselves.  Some people use this behavior to suggest that no person should ever criticize another person or that some people and groups of people are not allowed to be scrutinized.  It happens because of a feminine instinct to control the focus of attention of others and how they feel about what they are looking at.  The toxic mother figure using this strategy will tacitly try to change the subject and lead your attention back to yourself and make you feel bad about yourself.  This precludes the fact that you might be justified in your scrutiny.

shivah solomon

What is curious to me is that as I see the absence of the uncorrupted feminine principle in conversation, I also see it in relationship, and I see emergent properties in the world that are coming from this failure in one to one conversations and relationships.  I see the forcing of female communication rituals in the form of radical political correctness, and a meritocracy of pleasantness being instituted, which means that you can be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly, but you can’t speak the truth if it is unpleasant or if it hurts someone’s feelings.

In order to evaluate what I have just said, you will need the correct comparison set. Please don’t compare what I have said to your feelings, or what you believe is normal.  These are both biased comparison sets.  The correct comparison set is to compare it to Masculine Communication Rituals.  Remember that Bill O’Reilly in his book “Killing Patton”  pointed out that Patton thought that profanity was the language of the soldier.  And remember that Deborah Tannen created the initial science of Masculine and Feminine Communication Rituals.  Which use a positive form of Agonism to point out the mistakes that other men have made, mockingly, not to ridicule them but so that they will improve.  Furthermore, there is the ancient Greek practice of Parrhesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parrhesia)  Which Cornel West loves to use.  Remember if you will Socrates pointed out that Pretenders to Wisdom and his students would laugh as they eaves dropped on his conversations. . .