Every sane individual in the world realizes that something is going on. They wonder why China is building man made islands in the South-China sea that have military applications. They wonder why the Russians are all of a sudden the most hated enemy of Liberal Progressives and Muslim Terrorists are their best friends. They wonder why the Deep State Shadow Government is resisting Donald Trump at every step of the way. They wonder why Barack Obama is still acting like he is president of the United States. They wonder why the media and Illuminati Hollywood are inciting violence against Trump Supporters and calling for his impeachment or assassination. Why has China created a Non-Nuclear device that can create and EMP and ruin all electronic devices in the United States? Why has Russia created a cyber-weapon that can do the same thing?
When you are a political leader you are part of a kind of Secret Society. You are approached with ideas that you can’t talk about. If you do you risk being attacked or excluded from future conversations. If you say what you know you risk exposing how you know it.
I’ve said it before and I will say it again. There is a global plot that is already underway that is purportedly meant to protect the world from war and thermonuclear destruction but it will actually create what it intends to prevent or it will create Hell on Earth if it succeeds. If it succeeds the population on earth will be massively reduced. They will use Muslims to kill or convert Christians, Jews, and Buddhists. At that point they think religion will be meaningless and all people will essentially be Atheist. Global Warming will be the State Religion. There will be a Scientific Priest Class that tells people what to do, think, say, and feel. Participation can be demanded or forced. The State will own all of the jobs and the means of production determining who can produce and exactly how much they can produce. People won’t be getting those jobs. Robots will.
If you are unlucky enough to be chosen to live in this communist utopia you will be less than a slave. Russia and China aren’t stupid or evil enough to not protect their own children and way of life. They have the intelligence to realize that this future is undesirable. What they aren’t telling you is that much of Global Warming is caused by massive over-population of the earth. So who is picking who must die? And who are they selecting for execution? This is the hidden subject.
They aren’t going to fight their own people unless they have to and only when they can do so and win. They will play one group off the other slanting the deck in favor of those executing their will. This is why the police are being disparaged. This is why you have the rise of Antifa and Black Lives Matter. You aren’t being told what is going on because you are the target. George Soros, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, the Bilderberg’s and Media Elites have their sites set on you especially if you are a conservative or a Christian. You have a morality within you that won’t allow you to do the things demanded by the New World Order. So from their perspective you are not only useless you are a manifest threat to their will.
Barack Obama recently contradicted Donald Trump while in Germany by stating that in God’s eyes all children are equally deserving.
Mmm Hmm, whose “god” would that be? It isn’t my God of Reason. I didn’t realize that Obama suddenly speaks for God.
Separation of Church and State means that the Government shouldn’t be Religious. It doesn’t mean that Churches shouldn’t be Political. Yet Obama slapped regulations on Christian Churches telling them that they must not use their bully pulpit to talk about Politics. At the same time he used his Authority as President to continually lecture us about how to be “good Christians” which was essentially to fail as radical pacifists always do. After all we only have 2 cheeks to turn unless you count the ones on our ass.
While he was doing this, he ignored the Christian Genocide and the malignant growth of the largest Terrorist movement in recent history.
In the eyes of the God of Reason all children are not equal. Ishmael wasn’t equal to Isaac. And people who breed irresponsibly and use their children as sword and shield are not equal to people who endow their children with knowledge, understanding, and wisdom.
Wise King Solomon understood this when he threatened to cut the baby in half, knowing that the good mother would choose for her baby to live. Barry Hussein Obama knows this too, but he is making a tacit emotional appeal to the stupid female mind that wants to watch Pit bulls for Parolees and other forms of Female Pornography. He is capitalizing on the stupidity of the average American and invoking the tyranny of the Stupid Majority.
We aren’t “hiding” behind walls because we aren’t cowards. For the rest of his life Bathhouse Barry will have a living wall of Secret Service agents surrounding himself and his family. Yet, he is the coward that wants you to care more about that blue egg in your nest that you didn’t lay than your own children. And when that parasitic chicken comes home to roost it will kick your babies out of the nest and demand all of your attention as he is doing right now. It will scream that it is hungry for attention as it grows larger, and larger until you eventually realize, this Behemoth, this Leviathon, this Obama Nation is not your child and it never was. As it suckled on your tit it gave birth to millions of walking abortions. All of them intent on doing his will.
I love my children and my family which is why I want to protect them. Building a wall is an act of courage. Just look at how anybody that tries to help Donald Trump is being attacked. The Liberal Progressives want us to die. They are the NAZIS. They are actively trying to reproduce the failure of multiculturalism in the United States because they live in gated communities and have armed guards. The flag that they fly is the Double-Standard also known as the Beauseant of the Freemasons. You can’t tell if they are declaring war or surrendering because they are never doing either unless it benefits their agenda and does their Evil Will.
The concept of separation of Church and State actually comes from a quote by Thomas Jefferson, “Wall of separation between Church and State.” (SOURCE) So who is the coward hiding behind an illegitimate wall??? Who is the snake in the grass with a lying tongue? The Quran states, “Allah is the best liar.” and Barack Hussein Obama obviously learned from the best. The Father of the Lie, himself.
So a suicide bomber just attacked an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester United Kingdom. Of course I have been warning people that this would happen since 2014.
I feel no sympathy for the contemptuous, America Hating, Hollywood elites. These Ideological Fascists attack every person that disagrees with them. Tim Allen is a crypto-conservative and his successful show was canceled because of politics. I pray to God with every breath that the Conscious Evil of Hollywood types would only harm them and not others. Lord knows how much I have sacrificed and how much I have been persecuted and discriminated against after I created the Ban Sharia Brand in 2014. I got fired from Whole Foods Market after 12 years with the company because my online advocacy went viral, mainly because of that stupid bitch, Michelle Payne.
I’ve noticed that Donald Trump, like myself, has an almost prophetic ability. After I write something and after he says something it is as though fate conspires to prove us correct in spite of all opinion to the contrary.
You have to figure that at some point celebrities will start turning against the Ideological Fascism of Liberal Progressives. When is that going to happen? When their fans are the targets of terrorist attacks? When children are slaughtered? Or will the Useful Idiots in Hollywood and the Clowns that masquerade as comedians (I am glaring at you Saturday Night Live) have harm visited on their physical person?
Oh, on a related note, I did this Photoshop in 2014 for my advocacy. I also had my group shut down by Google for hate speech. Why? Because I know what they are thinking and what they teach? Because I can predict their behavior?
Over a month ago I tweeted Tucker Carlson for his “You make the NEWS” segment & I told him, “I want to know exactly how Catholic Charities makes money off paying for the housing of Muslim & Mexican Immigrants (Legal and otherwise).” I didn’t get any indication that he heard me. . .
The first time I read the God Delusion, I knew it was wrong on a number of points, but recently Richard Dawkins said some things that mad me interested in the book again and I bought a copy and started rereading it. I didn’t realize the first time what a truly manipulative and strategic communicator he really was. The reason this is important to me is that some of you know that I am a psycholinguist that looks for psychopathic patterns in communication and psychopaths are manipulative, strategic communicators.
One of Richards favorite tactics is to quote somebody else and agree with them instead of saying something himself, or he will invite somebody to make a logical fallacy that he himself doesn’t actually assert, or he will ask a question instead of making an assertion that could be falsified, he edits his consideration set to prove himself correct and he doesn’t include information that weakens his arguments. I will point out a couple of examples of these behaviors in his rants.
When the police are interrogating someone they look for the story to change, this is very important, how the story changes and what the story changes to because it can reveal intent to conceal or mislead. Every time the story changes it is important. When I first read the book Richard quotes a female friend of his as saying that she was sexually molested and it was “icky” but it did no long term damage and he agreed with her, then recently he said:
In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.
Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”
He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”
So we see that he was concealing his real narrative. This is a strategy that he uses repeatedly to avoid taking responsibility for what he is saying. Here is another instance where he is quoting Douglas Adams:
If somebody thinks taxes should go up or down you are free to have an argument about it. But on the other hand if somebody says ‘I mustn’t move a light switch on a Saturday’ you say, ‘I respect that’.
Who hear is expressing contempt for Orthodox Judaism? Is it Richard or Douglas? Who do I falsify? Does Richard agree with Douglas? If not why does he include the quote? In the next paragraph he he attacks Quakers, who started in England by rebelling against the Atheistic sexual debauchery and had to leave the country to get away from them. Now I don’t know about you, but I have never had an Chassidic Jew tell me that I wasn’t allowed to move a light switch on Saturday. Who is arguing for the authority to force Orthodox Jews to use the lights on Saturday? Not only are they mocking one of the first revolutions in civil rights, the original Holy Day, the first weekend that guaranteed that you were not allowed to work your slaves to death, and that you wouldn’t have to compete against people working 7 days a week and you had one day to yourself in which to relax and roger your wife, but it is also a post modernist movement for people that are tired of the rigors, deuchery, and psychopathic hypocrisy of modern life.
Oh, yeah, I will just leave this here….
“the right to be Christian seems in this case to mean the right to poke your nose into other people’s private lives’.”
EINSTEIN IS CONFUSING
“confuse” or enlighten? “deism is watered down theism“. Now what is so telling is that one moment he is saying that Deism is Theism and then he says he is not trying to debate Einstein’s god, but Einstein was a deist… Not only that, he doesn’t explain Einstein’s god because if he did some people would say, “Well, that is actually pretty interesting, I think I might be a deist too” and then they wouldn’t be as easily hypnotized by his propaganda that they must from now on harass and bully religious people. Richard Dawkins is not an authority on deism and he defines it falsely. I should know, I am a deist, Einstein and myself have the same god.
This is truly bizarre, he quotes Adolf Hitler verbatim but he doesn’t give credit to Hitler for the quote.
Now why is it that knowledge has to be fought? That is what is so strange about this quote, not only does it tell me he is most likely quoting Hitler, it tells me that he is manipulating people. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, unfortunately most Americans are not smart enough to detect what is for me the powerful stench of horse shit. He can easily befuddle the minds of people with a little bit of knowledge and turn them against the people of faith, just like somebody else I know, hmmm….
One of his communication strategies is to borrow authority from other cool people to make his ideas seem more hip. He uses the Beatles song to support his claim that without religion there would be no violence because there would be no clicks or groups of people that disagree with one another and fight each other. Not only is this assertion unproven, that a world without religion would be a peaceful world, but he ignores the fact that state enforced atheism has always failed, and has always been associated with violence and human rights atrocities. Furthermore, he ignores the fact of the first two primary influences of the Beatles music. Not to mention he is smart enough to know that children are not born as blank slates, that is why Noam Chomsky is famous, he falsified the Behaviorists who thought that children were blank slates. On top of that, if lets say we got rid of Islam would the thought tools, Abeed, Harem, and Taqiyya disappear? Would people no longer think in those terms? Or should we eradicate their language as well, like the Catholics who indoctrinated people into their own language?
Yukteswar Giri (also written yuktesvara, Sri Yukteswar) (Bengali: শ্রী যুক্তেশ্বর গিরী) (10 May 1855 – 9 March 1936) is the monastic name of Priya Nath Karar (Bengali: প্রিয়নাথ কাঁড়ার), the guru of Satyananda Giri and Paramahansa Yogananda. Yukteswar was an educator, astronomer, a Jyotisha (Vedic astrologer), a yogi, and a scholar of the Bhagavad Gitaand the Bible. He was a disciple of Lahiri Mahasaya of Varanasi and a member of the Giri branch of the swami order. Yogananda considered Yukteswar as Jnanavatar, or “Incarnation of Wisdom”.
Aleister Crowley (/ˈkroʊli/; born Edward Alexander Crowley; 12 October 1875 – 1 December 1947) was an Englishoccultist, ceremonial magician, poet, painter, novelist, and mountaineer. He was responsible for founding the religion and philosophy of Thelema, in which role he identified himself as the prophet entrusted with guiding humanity into theAeon of Horus in the early 20th century.
And then Richard contradicts himself again by creating another clique or group of people that is adversarial with everybody else…
“Indeed, organizing atheists has been compared to herding cats, because they tend to think independently and will not conform to authority. But a good first step would be to build up a critical mass of those willing to ‘come out,’ thereby encouraging others to do so. Even if they can’t be herded, cats in sufficient numbers can make a lot of noise and they cannot be ignored.”
Now what I find so interesting about the behavior of Atheists is that Atheism was not an organization, it was the absence of the presence of the belief in god, as such their behavior was not informed by Atheism and not organized. Now it is becoming organized and informed. But Atheists while attacking other groups ignore the bad stuff that their people say and do, just like a religion, while insisting that their bad behavior doesn’t characterize Atheism, at the same time atheists cannot be falsified by any praxis of Atheism, since they are still insisting that it is not an organization when in fact it is. Atheism is becoming a religion. What they are forgetting is that the highest form of their good is the absence of the presence of a form of good… If you want to talk about Delusional…
He just won’t give up on defending pedophilia. Notice the change in narrative, the first time he spoke it happened to a woman, then it happened to him, and it was “putting hands in my shorts” and then he mentioned it again and this time it was, “putting hands in clothes” he is using vague tautologies in order to make the whole matter look more harmless, and he is using an exaggerated comparison set in order to herd people towards the answer he wants in order to make it look more reasonable than it is.
I have spent a lot of time studying how psychopaths like Hitler rise to power, how they communicate harmlessness, and how they pass your threat filter, and then they get behind you and get you doing their dirty work. In the book click!, they say the fastest way to get a group of people to have a sense of unity is by instilling in them a shared sense of suffering, they need to feel victimized, persecuted. And then he uses his scientific authority to get them to attack his enemies, while he stays at home and “mildly” Frotteurises your children, but as my stand up comedy alter ego says:
I am trying to explain to people what I do and how I make predictions based on my psychological models. Because people are acquisitively mimetic, they copy behaviors that they see being rewarded. People copy whatever behavior they think of as winning behavior when they want to win. So when one person succeeds in a certain behavior people emulate that behavior and that creates social patterns. When society rewards these patterns it increases the frequency in which we see the pattern repeated and it also increases the intensity of that pattern.
The Psychologists Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal developed this concept of thin slicing in their treatment of married couples. What they found as they interviewed couples and then went back over the tape is that there were two expressions that repeatedly signaled the near demise of the relationship, disgust and contempt. Depending on the frequency and intensity of these expressions the relationship could be determined to be very close to ending.
So I observe in conversation, on the media, in human behavior these patterns and I make predictions based on them. So what does this mean for the near future? Society is about to get a divorce? No, much much worse. The first thing I noticed when I saw Richard Dawkins for the first time was the frequency with which he would flash this feral micro expression of disgust. And then I observed the Fundamentalist Drift of Science as the Dawkinites conflated themselves with science, I call them the cheerleaders of science. And then I noticed the increased hostility of the conversations in the narrative and dialogue on the internet. If you observe the body of evidence I have put together on this blog (http://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/) you can see that I am not making these claims lightly. I have spent a long time doing social experiments on these people to find out exactly where their heads are at.
Most people aren’t smart enough to detect Richard Dawkins subtle subterfuges in his rhetoric. What he propounds as a philosophy is not a philosophy at all and he is not a philosopher, he is a revolutionary propagandist. He has conflated the hatred of God (misotheism) with atheism and atheism with science. What he is trying to do and succeeding at is making science into a machine to attack religion. He is creating an environment where children can be exposed to the casual ridicule and hatred of religiosity, so that they start to think not only is it normal it is also good. And then he wants to build a bridge for them into the scientific fields and into upper academia, where they will put their prejudices to work, harassing religious people and preventing them from going into certain fields. What he is doing is so dangerous and insidious and deliberate.
This conceit that Atheists have that atheism is new, no it isn’t. Socrates was accused of being an atheist. So ask yourself why have you never heard of that one Atheist culture that was so successful? Because Atheism is unviable as a form of government. There are certain things science can’t do, and when you try to change what science can do you change what science is. Dawkins is building a testament to his own ego. He wants to be worshiped. He sees himself as a kind of Moses of Science taking his people out of a heathen land.
When Karl Marx wrote his theories on Communism, he thought it was science, they even called it that.
“Scientific socialism is the term used by Friedrich Engels to describe the social-political-economic theory first pioneered byKarl Marx. The purported reason why this socialism is “scientific socialism” (as opposed to “utopian socialism“) is because its theories are held to an empirical standard, observations are essential to its development, and these can result in changes and/or falsification of elements of the theory.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_socialism
And when the Germany adopted it, and Stalin adopted it, and Lenin adopted it, they all thought they were doing science and they couldn’t fail. Pure atheist societies are arrogant, heartless, and violent. You can’t use atheism or science or evolution for making an assertion that man should have inalienable rights. They are amoral systems. Dawkins puts religion on trial for all of the crimes that have been committed in the name of religion for thousands of years, Dawkinites assume that atheism is something new. What they are forgetting or ignoring is that while religion has created horrors and atrocities, IT HAS BEEN AROUND AND SUCCESSFUL MORE OR LESS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, while atheism has never been successful, ever, for any prolonged period of time.
Atheism is moral and philosophical anarchy, it isn’t a belief system, it is the absence of the presence of the belief that god exists. It isn’t big enough of an idea to make any assertion, you can’t build a law code on it, or a government on it. Atheists might be found that have morality but atheism itself is amoral, and atheists don’t have to come to any agreement on what behavior is and is not acceptable, after all, it is survival of the fittest right? If you survive or succeed you are the fittest. Evolution works!
But yeah, things are bad and they are going to get worse… this I promise.