Psychopathology and Entitlement.

Image

The last evolution of the human brain is the frontal lobe, it is also the last part of the brain to fully develop and neurally myelinate.  It essentially deals with proper relationship, right and wrong.  

Image

Function[edit]

The executive function of the frontal lobes involve the ability to recognize future consequences resulting from current actions, to choose between good and bad actions (or better and best), override and suppress socially unacceptable responses, and determine similarities and differences between things or events.

The frontal lobes also play an important part in retaining longer term memories which are not task-based. These are often memories associated with emotions derived from input from the brain’s limbic system. The frontal lobe modifies those emotions to generally fit socially acceptable norms.

Psychological tests that measure frontal lobe function include finger tapping, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, and measures of verbal and figural fluency.[5]

In my psychological model, psychopaths are over coddled children if they are not psychopaths due to damage or deformity.  They have been in an enriched environment in which they were able to have anything that they desired, this creates a normative process for them where they always expect to be able to have anything that they desire.  Psychopaths feel entitled, they feel worthy of everything.  There is the object that they covet and they are deserving of it, so the question becomes how do they get it, not how to they earn it.  

If you listen closely to the narrative of a psychopath they rationalize why they should have what they want even if it is a resource they don’t possess, even if it is somebody else’s resource, even if they have to trespass somebodies boundaries to get it.  They will lie, communicate strategically, obfuscate, conflate, every form of strategic communication in order to convince somebody that they should have what they want, that they deserve it.  I find this so interesting in observing psychopaths, the some of their actions has to take them in a direction where they can approach doing their will.  If their is something they want right now, they will communicate that this is the correct and moral thing to happen.  They will go back to something they already did, in a tit for tat exchange and they will inflate the value of a past service in order to get what they want right now. 

I had an interesting experience lately with the L case study.  I recently acquired a new dog, L is territorial and is threatened by any positive attention that is not being given to herself, she feels that she deserves to be the focus of all positive attention all of the time.  So based on shared state theory of communication and the communication rituals of the mother trying to control the focus of the child and control the way the child is emotionally in relationship with the object of focus it was interesting to deconstruct her narrative.  She kept on asking me over and over again if I had made an effort to find the dogs family, I had and was continuing to do so.  She would talk about how sad they must be and that the dog belonged to somebody in spite of my telling her that signs had been put up and somebody was taking them down and nobody had called to claim the dog.  Everything she was saying was a tautology of the dog not being mine, belonging to somebody else and leading towards framing me as doing something wrong  by communicating emotional data(the female mind uses fear, guilt, and shame to manipulate the male mind).  

Last night I was taking my dogs for a walk and lo and behold there was a little girl drawing on the pavement with chalk, and Pazuzu (that’s what I named her) started freaking out and wagging her tail, kissing the girl and snuggling her.  The little girl ran in the house and informed her parents that “shelby” was back.  The mother appeared and she was very chagrined, she chose her words carefully in front of the little girl, I asked her if she would like to talk somewhere out of earshot and she agreed, I asked her if she wasn’t able to afford a dog at this moment and she said that her family had just moved here from Texas, and they had just found out she was pregnant, and everybody was gone all day and the dog was very unhappy.  I said I would keep the dog and the little girl could see her.  I told her that I have a room mate that works different hours than myself and we have another dog about the same size, she was very happy.  That is as far as I got in the story with L.  

What happened next was a very special connection and emotional release with the dog.  She was inconsolable, whining and making noise, very sad.  Now here is the part that I wanted to tell L, the part that was important to me, me and Lisa my room mate started howling like wolves, and Pazuzu joined in wholeheartedly.  It was soulful, mournful, whaling, I didn’t realize the emotional impact of howling until I experienced this with Pazuzu, we became a wolf pack at that moment, sharing her suffering with her.  She was a little virtuoso at howling. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T-ZThSE5rQ)  <<<RELATED LINK. 

What L did, is she was like, “WAIT A MINUTE!  I THOUGH YOU SAID YOU FOUND THE FAMILY.”  She started repeating herself like a retard, with a lot of negative emotional data, reiterating that it was their dog, and the correct thing for them to do is for them to take responsibility for their actions, (L doesn’t take responsibility for her actions…) Notice the use of self appointed authority in her narrative, she can’t say what she is saying unless she is speaking from a perspective of moral authority.  She didn’t let me tell her about the healing part, the cathartic part that was so beautiful and meaningful to me.  She hijacked the conversation and drowned the narrative.  She even kept on calling me back and starting the conversation at the exact same place, increasing the intensity and emotional data.  

It is also of interest that two co-morbid psychopaths will join forces for the same reason, of getting what they want, even if they shouldn’t have it.  Also of interest is how much quicker people will band together to do evil than do good.  Just like L they don’t think about the happiness of everybody or anybody else, only their own happiness and feelings.  She completely ignored that value had been created for just about everybody, which is part of my theories on relationship “efficiency towards value”, and maximizing value, a meritocracy of results.  She even said to me on another subject that when she does stuff for me she doesn’t want anyone else benefiting from it, lol, the exact opposite of my stated purpose for our relationship.  (((SMH)))

Image

Advertisements

Doubling Down

Image

When somebody has “called the game” (my term) which is naming the “form of conquest” (my term) that the psychopath is using, the psychopath will “double down” that is they will repeat the process or pattern emphatically.  This happens for a number of reasons, first of all psychopaths can’t be reformed, second of all by repeating the pattern deliberately they are communicating to you that they are not sorry, and they are not going to stop, they don’t recognize anybodies authority over them to judge them because they are above reason.

The form of the conquest is also intimately connected with the issues that the psychopath has.  It symbolizes to them the way in which they are making the world right.  Having presupposed their own authority to judge and punish the world, and being in relationship with their issues and acting on their issues and moving from emotional morbidity at the same time not wanting to be mentally and emotionally sound, they want to acquaint everybody with their issues, they want to reify their issues in everybody’s mind.  They have to go about business in the same way, this is the Modus operandi, that allows multiple crimes to be connected to the same individual, in their patterns and processes they tell you who they are and why they are doing what they are doing.  They can’t help but telegraph their issues, this is one of the premises of Shared state theory of communication, you communicate whatever state you are in.  Psychopaths have to use psychopathic means.

Modus operandi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modus operandi (plural modi operandi) is a Latin phrase, approximately translated as “method of operation”.[1] The term is used to describe someone’s habits of working, particularly in the context of business or criminal investigations. In English, it is often shortened to M.O.

The expression is often used in police work when discussing a crime and addressing the methods employed by the perpetrators. It is also used in criminal profiling,[2] where it can help in finding clues to the offender’s psychology.[3] It largely consists of examining the actions used by the individual(s) to execute the crime, prevent its detection and/or facilitate escape.[1] A suspect’s modus operandi can assist in his identification, apprehension, or repression, and can also be used to determine links between crimes.[4]

In business, modus operandi is used to describe a firm’s preferred means of doing business and interacting with other firms.

JOXUA LUXOR VS. BRUCE BUENO DE MESQUITA

Image

I was fleshing out my models on the psychopathic mind when I first came across the TED talk by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita.  I could not believe the arrogance on his part.  I immediately new he was wrong on a number of points, he simply didn’t know how the psychopathic mind works.  His models were based on everybody being rational.  All his talk about science and what have you what a bunch of nonsense.  Psychopaths are not rational, they have no incentive to relinquish control.  I knew that the theocracy in Iran would double down, after the protests.  My whole model, what he would call wisdom, is based on understanding the mind or soul or psychology of the person that I am in relationship with to the point where I understand what drives them and I can predict their behavior and how events are interpreted by them.

“But as the computer model ran forward in time, through 2009 and into 2010, positions shifted. American and Israeli national-security players grudgingly accepted that they could tolerate Iran having some civilian nuclear-energy capacity. Ahmadinejad, Khamenei and the religious radicals wavered; then, as the model reached our present day, their power — another variable in Bueno de Mesquita’s model — sagged significantly.”  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/magazine/16Bruce-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Tens of thousands of demonstrators packed the streets Monday outside the former U.S. embassy in Tehran in the biggest anti-American rally in years, a show of support for hard-line opponents of President Hassan Rouhani’s historic outreach to Washington.

Such protests occur every year outside the former embassy compound to mark the anniversary of the 1979 takeover following the Islamic Revolution. But the latest demonstration is the largest in years after calls by groups such as the powerful Revolutionary Guard for a major showing, including chants of “death to America” that some of Rouhani’s backers have urged halted.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/11/04/thousands-protest-at-former-us-embassy-in-iran/3431143/

 

“If the price for getting cooperation on ISIS is giving Iran a free pass on the nuclear issue, then Israel is worried,” he said.

American intelligence and military officials said Iran had sent some weaponry and equipment to Iraq, but discounted news reports on Friday that the Quds had sent hundreds of troops to reinforce the Iraqi Army, whose northern divisions have folded in the face of the Sunni militants. But American officials said they were monitoring the reports closely, expressing concerns that sending Shiite militias into Iraq would only further destabilize a rapidly deteriorating security situation in the country. “We encourage all of Iraq’s neighbors, including Iran, to play a constructive role,” Rear Adm. John F. Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, told reporters on Friday.

“If the price for getting cooperation on ISIS is giving Iran a free pass on the nuclear issue, then Israel is worried,” he said.

American intelligence and military officials said Iran had sent some weaponry and equipment to Iraq, but discounted news reports on Friday that the Quds had sent hundreds of troops to reinforce the Iraqi Army, whose northern divisions have folded in the face of the Sunni militants. But American officials said they were monitoring the reports closely, expressing concerns that sending Shiite militias into Iraq would only further destabilize a rapidly deteriorating security situation in the country. “We encourage all of Iraq’s neighbors, including Iran, to play a constructive role,” Rear Adm. John F. Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary, told reporters on Friday.

Asked what such a role might entail, Admiral Kirby said: “They could stop supporting extremist networks, right? That’s one thing.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/14/world/middleeast/beleaguered-iraqis-court-iranian-mastermind-of-the-shiites-who-fought-the-us.html?_r=0

Sex matters…

Thought Uncommon

Image

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sex-matters-drugs-can-affect-sexes-differently/

I catch a lot of flack for my ideas about the differences between men and women and a lot of that flack comes from feminazis, gomers, vagina worshipers, highly educated idiots and children that have been indoctrinated into man hate.  The reason that happens is because this is America the most feminized country on the planet.  The problem is this, it doesn’t matter how many morons agree with one another, it doesn’t make them more correct.  The tyranny of the stupid majority cannot go unchecked.

You have been propagandized into thinking that there is no difference between masculinity and femininity and this creates a disparate impact in favor of femininity.  This prejudice is not only dangerous for relationships and to the stability of america it is dangerous for individuals.  Women in america think that their is a magickal force that protects them from evil and bad things happening to…

View original post 1,405 more words

Reputation Brokering

Image

One of the psychopathic processes that is the most successful is reputation brokering.  It is not the same as gossiping but it mimics the pattern.  Psychopaths gravitate towards structures of authority because of feelings of superiority and the desire to abuse power.  Once in those positions instead of executing their offices faithfully they position themselves to keep those offices, this means preventing the next generation of leaders from moving up.  They hate you because of your ability and their lack of ability to compete.  Psychopaths have undeservedly good reputations and they encourage those that kiss their ass to tell them lies about themselves and how good they are, they try to reify this into fact and act as if it is so.  Comorbid toxicity in relationships is more common than it is uncommon, I want to believe this lie about myself and you want to believe this lie about yourself, we will enter into a relationship and I will tell you your lie and you will tell me my lie. Until along comes a threat to their authority, Billy Badass.  Billy Badass knows himself correctly and evaluates himself correctly, he knows what he is and what he can do, he can’t be controlled or manipulated.

They use your  control of your reputation as a leveraging mechanism, if you don’t let them control you and control what you think and what you do they will besmirch your reputation.  Chris Dorner knew himself, he had experience, think of the Dunning kruger effect where the person without experience over evaluates themselves and the experienced person under sells themselves.  The experienced person is aware of their weaknesses and strengths and is thinking of their failures, while the psychopath who is untried is thinking about their feelings about themselves, and how awesome they feel they are.

Image

So since then some police have been force to wear body cameras so that they can be monitored while they work, if they are a primarily psychopathic organization, attracting psychopaths and vigilant against sociopaths we would expect to see a large discrepancy between the results when they are being observed and when they are not being watched, is that the case?

But Rialto’s randomised controlled study has seized attention because it offers scientific – and encouraging – findings: after cameras were introduced in February 2012, public complaints against officers plunged 88% compared with the previous 12 months. Officers’ use of force fell by 60%.

“When you know you’re being watched you behave a little better. That’s just human nature,” said Farrar. “As an officer you act a bit more professional, follow the rules a bit better.”

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/04/california-police-body-cameras-cuts-violence-complaints-rialto

http://www.lapdonline.org/assets/pdf/Harvard-LAPD%20Study.pdf

One of the things I write about is the ability to recognize the psychopath and the psychopathic behavior, and having the courage, strength, and technique to confront the behavior of the psychopath.  Chris Dorner is in a way a martyr and a hero.  Confronted with an entire department of psychopaths and not being able to get justice, having his reputation stolen from him by creeps and spiders, he found it within himself to fight evil and make the ultimate sacrifice.  When you are in a position such as his and you can’t be a part of the solution sometimes all you can do is draw attention to the problem.

I hereby make Chris Dorner an honorary Wolfpack Member.

Image

Image

How to be an office Deuchebag.

Image

Ignore the fact that the person has an excellent reputation with the company and that they have performed at an outstanding level for the past 11 years.  Ignore the fact that the economy is tanking and that sales are off the chart.  Ignore the fact that your team member is breaking records.  Ignore the fact that you will never be able to replace him.  Ignore the fact that no human being could do everything perfectly given the lack of time, the volume of movement, and the physical demands of the job. 

Remember that you have one single iota of power, a slight promotion over him.  Remember that you don’t have to be part of the solution all you have to do is criticize, you don’t have to be part of the solution if you can’t be directly blamed for the problem and if all you do is delegate than you can’t be blamed for anything.  If you can find a single thing wrong focus on that, especially if he is on his break.  Keep on putting responsibility on him.  “There is a price tag missing, a customer wants to know how much the item costs, what are we going to do about that?”

Well you could walk your ass over to a register and do a price check, but god forbid you use your own resources to be part of the solution, that’s not your job, pointing out problems is your job.  You are a problem pointer outer.  Oh, don’t forget to scream with your face, to let everybody know that you are making an insincere implicature.  

Lingering

Image

I wanted to start listing the psychopathic processes, patterns, and behaviors that I come across.  This is one I recently picked up from the L case study.  Over stay your welcome and then get offended when other people want you to leave or get irritated at your presence.  In a meritocracy of pleasantness instead of a meritocracy of reason, from the feminine perspective, you win.  Now with your self appointed moral authority you have the right to punish them by extracting a fee or by whining, nagging, making an appeal to sympathy or “caring”.  Each time they repeat that you they want you to leave or become more emotional about leaving, react by becoming even more emotional, and histrionic.  The fascinating thing about this technique is that it further removes people’s wanting you to be around and creates a counter incentive to them wanting to be around you in the future.  But then you can get offended again…

A deviation of this histrionic ploy is to take forever telling a story without any interesting information in it for the other person.  Just talk because you like the sound of your voice, or because you like the way your mouth feels when you make word sounds.  In my theories, proper communication is done to create value for other people, it tells them something useful, true, meaningful, or pleasant.  If you are talking and the other person isn’t enjoying themselves or they get angry when you have finished, that is a sign that you screwed up.  As a general rule, I try to be clear, cogent, profound and brief.  “Clear” means easy to understand, “cogent” means well thought out,(think before you open your yap), “profound” means telling a person something they have NOT HEARD BEFORE!  and “brief” means GET TO THE POINT AND SHUTUP!  

Image

Image

The Mind Hacker…