A cabal is a group of people united in some close design together, usually to promote their private views or interests in a church, state, or other community, often by intrigue, usually unbeknownst to persons outside their group. Cabals are sometimes secret societies composed of a few designing persons, and at other times are manifestations of emergent behavior in society or governance on the part of a community of persons who have well established public affiliation or kinship. The term can also be used to refer to the designs of such persons or to the practical consequences of their emergent behavior, and also holds a general meaning of intrigue and conspiracy. The use of this term usually carries strong connotations of shadowy corners, back rooms and insidious influence. The term is frequently used in conspiracy theories; some Masonic conspiracy theories describe Freemasonry as an internationalist secret cabal.
For those of you who haven’t figured it out yet, the Obama Cabal is trying to start a violent, Islamo-Fascist Revolution while not appearing to be the cause so he can step in as the Voice of Reason, pardon them, & reform the Government in the way he sees fit. Which means taking away our guns, replacing the Police, dismantling the Armed Forces & empowering the Muslim dominant United Nations in order to consolidate all Authority into a One World Government, at which point Obama will assume High Office in the United Nations…
I can tell you that he is in league with the Nation Of Islam, community organizers and the protests on college campuses as well as the Black lives matter protestors. Al Sharpton is in his pocket because of not paying his taxes. Jay-Z and the vast majority of the musicians are working with him including Madonna, Prince, Lil Wayne, Drake, Chris Brown, Beyoncé, Lon Milo Duquette, and others including a growing number of actors and actresses. The Freemasons are being infiltrated by the NOI & the Muslim Brotherhood. The Ivy League Colleges, are participating with Obama’s agenda as well as Richard Dawkins, Stephen Pinker, and Noam Chomsky. Also the Secret Scientist panel that determines what is and is not Pseudo-science for the TED talks is part of the plot as is Bill Gates, Starbucks, Mark Zuckerberg, & Muhammad Yunus from World Bank.
Some of you know that I was raised Jehovah’s Witness and was constantly bombarded with hypnotic propaganda not only from “The Organization” but also from my father. It had a peculiar effect on me, my brain automatically becomes irritated by anybody that is trying to wield undo influence on me. The rest of society also has this instinct, although they possess it to a less extent than I do. For this reason I coined the phrase “intelligent objects” in reference to human beings. This term indicates that while objects are predictable, human beings are less so. What is true about humans at one moment in time is not necessarily true about them at a later point in time. Human beings can only be manipulated so far before they cease to be influenced by that form of manipulation. This happens because of the constant way in which the Intelligent Object is constantly, unconsciously editing it’s consideration set (a term I appropriated and redefined from business philosophy and consumer psychology).
I had already profiled Obama as a psychopath over a year ago after noticing that he was communicating strategically and manipulatively. I already knew that Hillary was being schooled in how to lie with out leaking any micro-expressions that would betray her. I knew that because when she was lying she sounded exactly like Obama, speaking in an emotionless monotone, and pausing repeatedly when she started becoming emotional so that tension wouldn’t creep into her voice and betray her. I also knew that Obama was using the best of modern psychology to influence black and Mexican minorities to feel a kinship with Islam.
How did this all start? What is their end game? The plot is so twisted and convoluted I would make myself sound insane if I tried to lay it all out at one moment in time. So I am going to keep this pithy and tell you what can be most easily proven.
In the book BLINK! by Malcolm Gladwell, he spoke of one of the latest psychological discoveries, in a test they would flash pictures of people with different ethnicities and they would have words on the screen with different human virtues or vices. As quickly as possible, without deliberation, people were supposed to associate the characteristics with the faces. One of the emergent properties of this test was that all people, including black people, associated black people with negative human characteristics. I refer to this instinct as Superficial Aesthetic Snap Decisions.
Based on my theories I can assure you that this comes from Neural Myelination that is passed down through cellular memory. Now what is important is that this instinct evolved over thousands or millions of years and exists because those instincts were associated with survival.
In a typical liberal fashion, liberal progressives blame the beneficiaries of this bias for the existence of the bias, as if it is part of some global, conspiracy orchestrated by white males. Without questioning why this unconscious bias exists universally in the human genome, they decided that it was bad and set about attempting to reverse it, just as they did with the Cultural Universal of believing in God and the instinct to hire and promote men faster for certain positions.
BUT AT LEAST THEIR WON’T BE ANY GLOBAL WARMING!!! 🙂
As Obama started trying to manipulate the cultural stereotypes and common public opinion he found several things out, white people became depressed, addicted to drugs, and started committing suicide, which from his perspective was a good thing. Also he tried to portray the Police as “occupiers” and our armed forces as “terrorists” he continued to use manipulative narrative and his popularity to make ISIS terrorists seem less evil, they were just confused, they needed jobs, misguided. Lastly, and most importantly he started influencing how people in general feel about black people in general. And what he found was that he could cause riots and get people to sympathize with the violent rioters, which was hunky dory as far as he is concerned because he hates America and he thinks capitalism is evil. He wants to financially and militarily hobble America so that we can’t climb out of debt and be a moralizing influence on the world. He wants to empower the United Nations and make a One World Government with a Muslim bias and remove Israel after which all of the Jews will be hunted down and killed and all of the Christians will be murdered, converted, or become sex property.
When everybody is Muslim and Israel and America are gone (also France, Germany, Britain, and the rest of the civilized world) religion will be irrelevant. I mean what is the alternative? Muslims are the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people in the world anyway so either we have a world war and kill of all of the Muslims or he minimizes losses by stacking the deck in favor of Islam and empowers the United Nations with it’s Muslim bias which will look the other way. Which is fine with him because he is not a real Christian any way, he is just waiting for the right moment to announce that we are all fools and he has been a Muslim this whole time, and then he will laugh maniacally, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! STUPID, YOU ARE SO STUPID!!! HOW DID YOU NOT KNOW I WAS A SECRET MUSLIM THIS WHOLE TIME??? IT’S CALLED “TAQIYYA” OR AS I LIKE TO THINK OF IT, TAH KILL YA!!!
Oh, yeah, one last thing, he is also working closely with Facebook and learning what they know about manipulating people by controlling what they can see and hear. Facebook is also collecting a lot of data on you. Facebook also has a Muslim bias and they are part of Obama’s attempt to get people to think Islam is cool and the Jews are lame.
…but Hussein, you are applying a religious test, are you not?
“When I hear folks say that,” the president said, “when I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person who’s fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted, when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefited from protection when they were fleeing political persecution, that’s shameful.” “That’s not American.”
Not only are you giving preference to Muslim refugees over Christian refugees, when the Christians are more persecuted and the target of forced conversion, genocide, and becoming war booty, the sexual property of jihadis but you know as well as I do that the test for presenting aPrima Faciaelaw suit demonstrating discrimination is based on showing statistical disparate impact being created. You are consciously creating disparate impact in favor of violent Muslim extremists because you are a closeted Muslim, I am not going to wait for you to pull off your mask and laugh and say that you were a Muslim the whole time and we are so stupid. You aren’t fooling anybody, and you are an evil P.O.S. Us real Christians have a little biblical saying:
Did you or did you not apply a religious test when you refused to armChristians targeted for extinction in Africa and the Middle East? And when you refused to arm the Yazidis? Do you apply a Religious test when you criticize and lecture Christians but only praise Muslims? Do you apply a religious test when you ignore the constitutional freedom of speech and say that the “The world should not belong to those who (tell the truth about) the Prophet of Islam”?
Your rhetoric is mis-applied because we ARE NOTelecting them president, we are determining whether they are eligible for citizenry. The reason that a religious test is appropriate is because THAT PARTICULAR RELIGION has an ideology that is diametrically opposed to everything that the Western Civilized World is based on.
Interestingly, Hitler was also a Christian in name who secretly despised Christians but had many positive things to say in favor of Islam…
I’m going to be adding to this for the next couple of days, in order to show the psyche of the Muslim & how they behave in relationship and in conversation. Because I am constantly trolled by Muslims on Twitter and G+ when I am reminded of one of their strategies I will add it to this and extend this blog.
LIE, LIE, LIE!
Psychopaths are pathological liars. Not only does the Quran state that Islam is based on a lie in another scripture it claims that the Muslim God is the best liar. (Qur’an 3:54,Qur’an 7:99) Taqiyya & Kitman are but a few dispensations that Muslims have for promoting, defending, and concealing the truth about Islam and its intentions through lying. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman) Taqiyya & Hudna are combined in a false Muslim Cease fire in which they make an agreement to stop fighting in order to rest for a surprise attack later.
IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE TO AGREE
They engage you in these mind-numbing circular arguments, if you don’t agree with them then you have failed to grasp what is essentially Islam. They will keep on redirecting your attention to scriptures in the Quran like a mother trying to change the way you feel about the thing that they keep on directing your attention to. For me this is one of the most annoying strategies because it is a complete waste of time and it is meant to wear you out. In logic this is called “argumentum ad nauseam”, unfortunately it can work on weaker minds, especially feminine ones. They confuse the pleasantness of the person repeating themselves with the actual content of the Quran and the spirit of Islam. Muslims might know how to manipulate the Feminine Bias of the Western mind better than any other people. Remember that under a Meritocracy of pleasantness you can be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly but you are wrong for speaking the truth if it is unpleasant.
Because of the fact that the Quran and Mohammed contradict themselves completely at different times, as though Mad Moe was bi-polar, Muslims can lie and say the Quran teaches this or that. Yes, but it also teaches the exact opposite, so as a philosophy it is invalid because it is self-contradictory. If you read it carefully it says that real Muslims fight, the ones that stay at home are not as good.Quran (4:95) Fighting was prescribed by Allah for Muslims. Quran (2:216) The philosophy of Islam is Jihad centric and the entire religion is organized as an invasive war cult that spreads it’s ideology through lies, manipulation, back door deals, strategic positioning, and then inevitably, physical violence. Quran (3:56) If you examine the names of Muslim terrorist groups it is a direct reflection of the actual philosophy of the “Religion” Boko Haram (Western Knowledge Forbidden) Taliban (The Students) Jamaat ul Fuqra (Community of the Impoverished). Zakat, Muslim tax, one of the 5 pillars of Islam is used to fund terrorism. The meaning of Jamaat ul Fuqra demonstrates the connection between Zakat and the merciful feeding of the poor in Islam. Muslims also solicit disillusioned and depressed youth in prisons and out of mosques for suicide missions.
EVERYBODY IS A MUSLIM
Islam claims to be a Judeo-Christian Abrahamic religion after saying that the Jews and the Christians lied, but Allah is the best liar. They think the Jews and Christians lied because Moses and Jesus were foretold but Mad Moe was not so they stupidly think the bible was altered. They twist the rolls of Cain and Abel making Cain the good guy the victim of mind control of his brother who forced him to kill himself with the powers of his brain.
They reverse the rolls of Ishmael and Isaac, making Ishmael the good guy who received the blessing of god. Adam was a Muslim, Jesus was a Muslim, everybody important was a Muslim, even though Noah obviously brought pigs on the ark which is haram, and Jesus turned water into wine, haram. Oh, and one more thing, all babies are born Muslim, which means that they from their perspective are more the parents of your children than you are…. (let that sink in)
YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND IF YOU DON’T SPEAK ARABIC
Even if you did learn Arabic they would say you have failed to comprehend it. The Arabic Language presupposes a caste system, including slaves, that allows different interpretations depending on who is being spoken to. The Word “Haram”, for example, means Forbidden but it also is the place where the Women, Wives, Concubines, & Sex Slaves sleep. It is also where Male “Family Members” are allowed to enter for Recreation and other reasons. “Boko Haram” literally means, Western Knowledge is Forbidden, which is why they kidnap, rape, and murder little black girls that have been given Western Education.
Psychopathy is also synonymous with aggressive narcissism. In order to understand Muslim debate strategy you have to understand where their feelings of Superiority come from. First of all, Adam was the first man and he was Muslim. From their perspective wherever they stand they are their own caliphate and they are above the law of the land. As a linguistic philosopher I am a soft linguistic determinist. If you deconstruct the psyche of the Arabic language what you find is that it presupposes and Arrogant, Aristocratic superiority. The language itself puts on airs of royalty. It is the language of liars. Each word is given so many different interpretations because of who is being spoken too that it is impossible to nail it down into a single specific meaning or intent. Whereas English has become the Lingua-Franca of Science, Arabic is the Lingua-Franca of arrogant, narcissistic, liars who think themselves kings. Indeed what you will find in the Muslim world is that Muslims never pick up their own filth because they consider themselves royalty. In Saudi Arabia the import Abeed (black slaves, yeah, it’s like that one word we can’t say) to pick up their garbage for them.
Muslims are the largest & fastest growing population of people on earth. They are also one of the most illiterate. They translate fewer books into Arabic than any other culture on the planet including Greece which translates 2 or 3 times more books into Greek. This is part of their strategy for keeping a large society controlled. There is a direct correlation between stupidity and violence. Muslims only have one book the Quran (as well as the Hadith and the Sacred Hadith). They have a priest class that can read and tells the illiterate masses what to think, say, and do. You have to realize that this is essentially the opposite of evolution, resurrecting the priest class which hasn’t existed seen since Ancient Egypt.
DON’T PATRONIZE ME
There might be nothing more annoying than being condescended to by a stupid person that is obviously lying to you . Because of the nature of the Arabic language, Arabic epigenetics, and the psychology of the Muslim religion, Muslims presuppose their superiority and their own correctness. That means like a toxic overbearing parent that doesn’t respect your boundaries they believe they have the right to lie to you, manipulate you, help themselves to anything you have, & refuse to acknowledge when you have proven them wrong. remember please that Muslims are some of the worst parents on the planet. They have the highest occurrence of child molestation for which their are provisions in the Quran and they have the highest incidents of honor killings. So you are the abused child in relationship with psychopathic, overbearing, schizophrenic parent, when you are in relationship or conversation with a Muslim. Persia has always been synonymous with Tyranny which has always been against democracy, freedom, and Civilization.
WHY ARE YOU TELLING ME???
Yet another one of their cloying, insipid strategies the “Moderate Muslims” repeatedly tell you that Islam is a religion of peace. Why are they wasting their breath telling me? Wouldn’t their time be better spent ministering to the Jihadis? They aren’t exactly hiding on social media. Don’t tell me that child rape, torture, and beheading are against Islam, tell the Muslims that are doing it. The moderate Muslims can’t even defend themselves from the radical Muslims, why, the hell, should I listen to them??? Their arguments are contradicted and negated by the violent Muslims as well as the Muslim scriptures so they are therefore irrelevant and their testimony is invalid and a waste of time. The only way the behavior makes any sense is if you assume they are trying to get you to lower your guard so that when you are attacked you aren’t prepared to defend yourself. Seriously, do yourself a favor and don’t waste your time talking to these people or anybody that associates with them.
I AM A VICTIM of ISLAMOPHOBIA!!!
Act like a victim while you are victimizing. Take a gander at this little piece of bat shit insanity. Muslims act like a persecuted minority everywhere in the world where they are not the majority. Everywhere they are the majority the persecute EVERY MINORITY!Muslims are not responsible for the evil they do. Everybody else is responsible for the evil they do. They are not responsible for being sane or tolerant of criticism of their prophet or their religion. They are incapable of scrutinizing or controlling themselves. Moham-head was justified in killing the Jews because they attacked him by existing and being evil & the Jewish woman that poisoned him is evidence to that fact. She didn’t poison him because she felt victimized by his serial murder of Jews, she attacked him because Jews are evil.
With the concealed narrative of psychopaths their strategic communication is hard to spot because they do not openly state the logical fallacies and cognitive biases they are acting on. They insist that they are sane and rational while at the same time consistently creating a disparate impact for themselves and the people they project their sense of self onto. It is possible in rhetoric, apologetics and polemics to subtly warp and distort reality for the purpose of manipulating the minds of others.
To Bifurcate means to make categories that are false or misleading. If the person stated what they think openly it would ruin their reputation and marginalize their credibility, because they would look insane to everybody. This is why psychopaths use a concealed narrative.
In order to expose this form of strategic communication. I created some terms to make their strategy more obvious to those not skilled in debate, philosophy, and rhetoric. When deconstructing a persons narrative you want to look at the tacit categories cause of the good and cause of the bad. This deals with the way the frame events and statements, they draw an imaginary line and one thing or a group of things are always bad and the things they project their sense of self onto are always good. The Form of their conquest is the social climbing behavior they use to set the world right in their eyes. They have to keep changing the world in the same way in order to do their will. The sum of their actions have to do their genuine will.
As you observe the strategic rhetoric of Mr. Barack Obama, you will find that he consistently creates disparate impact in specifically the same way. America, Israel, white people, the police, and the military are always the cause of the bad, and violent, uneducated, brown to black people are always the cause of the good. Not only are they not responsible for the evil they do, they are not doing evil, and if they are doing evil it is only because the evil white people are forcing them to do it by not laying down and letting evil (I mean good) run rampant through the world.
Obama’s Highest form of the Good, His God, is also concealed or openly lied about. He is only a christian in name, not indeed, you remember the rhetoric of Reverand Wright?
The whole thing about psychopathic narrative is that it switches. The story keeps changing. Obama twice had the Freudian slip saying that he was a Muslim, he chose the most Imam like “christian” pastor he could find. The only part of Obama’s narrative and behavior that doesn’t keep changing is the same behavior that he keeps falling all over himself to keep quiet.
When I am constructing a psychological profile on a person, which I do on everybody I am in relationship with, I compare the individual to the rational man, based on every exchange, action, and word. I am sure that many people will react negatively to this idea, and that is a reflection of the impoverished state of reason and relationship which has become the norm in todays world.
It seems obvious to me that we would want to intimately understand the people that we are in relationship with, but relationships have deteriorated into superficial, personality addictions, we like someone not because of who they are but because of how they make us feel, based on the way they look or someone or something they remind us of. People are playing characters, they aren’t being honest or authentic. Nowadays both people in the relationship are acting like they are something they are not.
In my psychological models, no action is necessary, so every action is meaningful. You eat because you want to live, etc. Being that their are two types of behaviors rational and irrational there are also two types of minds, male and female or sociopathic and psychopathic. Every interaction creates an end that is either sociopathic or psychopathic (based on how I define those terms). Whereas, a rational person can remain consistently rational, a psychopathic person must act psychopathicly (irrationally) in order to do their will. They think this makes them smart and unpredictable but just the opposite is true. It is because they can’t behave rationally that they are predictable, they will try to take some unfair advantage, they will attack, they will not have a reason, and they will not warn that they are about to attack, of this you can be sure.
A reasonable person can only be defined in relationship, in relationship with reality, in relationship with other people, in conversation. Shared states are participation, agreement, conversation, and understanding.
Also, it depends on the environment itself, is the environment rational? is the other person rational or are they being strategic. To remain rational while the other person is being irrational is irrational because it is unsustainable.
A rational relationship has to be sustainable, it has to succeed, it has to create a surplus of value, not a deficit (which is to say it has to create more value than it consumes). It has to allow all parties to do their will. No person in the group can be given more value from the group than is sustainable based on their contribution to the group. A rational relationship has to increase the value of the members and the members have to increase their ability to create value for the rational relationship. This presupposes that in this rational relationship, which we eventually see is a philoish, or a philosophical family, people learn, they grow, they teach, they only relate to one another in a positive and educational way, not in a negative strategic way. You increase the value of those around you. You help them become rational and get better results in the world. This is the relationship of all relationships, the original perfect idea of relationship.
Everything said can have value in one of 3 ways, it is true, it is useful, and it makes you feel better. Of these 3 the least valuable is making you feel better, this is true of female minds including children, and they irrationally esteem this communication of positive emotional data over the other three. Children are irrational, emotional creatures, so it is necessary to communicate to them positive emotional data that is not always true or useful until they get to an age when they are capable of being non-delusionally in relationship with reality. This makes more sense to the female mind than it does to the male mind, because as Deborah Tannen says women ventriloquize, interpreting to the husband the emotional data communicated by the child. Evolution compartmentalized the female mind to be more interested in and sympathetic with babies. From the female perspective the emotional/irrational reasoning of the child is more valid than it is to the male mind which is more interested on survival. But the end result of both instincts determines whether the relationship is rational or not.
When I build my psychological models, every deviation from reason communicates to me something about the person I am in relationship with or conversation with. Does the person identify with reason? If reason is their highest good, then reason informs their behavior and narrative. How and when they deviate from rational relationship leaves traces, clues as to who they are, their psyche, their soul, how they are in relationship with the world and the individuals in the world, rationally or delusionally, authentically or strategically, psychopathicly or sociopathicly.
THE AUTHOR REFERS TO THE SOCIOPATHIC BRAIN AS THE RATIONAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL MALE BRAIN, BECAUSE OF CERTAIN PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS LIKE PARRHESIA AND AGONISM BEING SYNONYMOUS WITH PHILOSOPHY AND REASON AND PARTS OF RATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, RELATIONSHIPS AND FOUND IN LESS FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY IN FEMALE NARRATIVE, THOUGHT, AND BEHAVIOR.