Category Archives: equity in human relationship theory

Proto-Indo-European & Political Opinion

ahura_mazda02

I am not a huge fan of horror movies, but last night I watched Clive Barker’s Wishmaster. The movie was not entirely without substance, turns out Clive is a bit of a philologist himself.  Like me he has come to the conclusion that Islam existed before it was supposedly created by Mohammed and he traces their origins, as I have to Ahriman, Ahura Mazda’s brother.  Where we disagree is that he interprets Ahura Mazda as the “Cause of the Bad” as well as the cause of the good.

Ahura Mazda created everything good and his brother created everything bad.

I interpret that differently.  In the Ancient World they practiced slavery.  Appreciating intelligence as they did, they had a bar of citizenry that was based on intelligence, being able to understand the complex way in which the state operated and being able to create value for that state.  Slaves were allowed in the hopes that they could eventually be integrated into society.  While there were some instances in which this was the case what happened repeatedly throughout history is that the vast majority of those people didn’t become capable of embracing the philosophy of civilization and raising themselves to the bar of citizenry.

In the book MAIMONIDES by Abraham Joshua Heschel, it explains that neither Carthage nor Rome were capable of converting the Berbers of Northern Africa to their Political Philosophy because they didn’t recognize the Authority of Reason only Coercive Authority, that of Physical Violence which is why Islam succeeded in converting the Barbarians to their religion.  Shortly after that the Berbers started a revolution in Islam killing off the intelligentsia and the artists, Islam has remained the same to this day.

The Berber’s are actually the product of the failed attempt to fuse European Cultures with African Cultures which is why you had Upper and Lower Egypt in spite of the propaganda spouted by the black rappers, which is why the Berbers are light skinned.  It was recently leaked that King Tut had European DNA which is being concealed by Egypt, because white people would cry foul and riot if that fact was exposed (joke).

Muslims claim to be a Judeo-Christian religion and they claim descent from Adam, whom they claim was the first Muslim but they contradict themselves in believing that they are not tainted by original sin because they reject science (knowledge comes from the devil) and western education (are you seeing a pattern here?).  You can’t have it both ways, if you are descended from Adam you are tainted by original sin.

What this means is that we were there, White People that is.  Caucasians are named after the Caucasus mountains in Russia.  The Amazons spoken of by Plato were inspired by the Sarmatian race (Caucasoid) native to Iran.  The Hebrews refer to us as the Edomites, which is associated with the Garden of Eden, and the first stone on the breastplate of Aaron, Odem.

The entire philosophy of civilization (the Western World) comes from the philosophy of the Augur cult who interpreted bird omens.

From the separation of powers in the constitution to the philosophy of science, to the first King of Rome, to the two invasive months in the Western Calender, everything we are came from the Augurs.

The third eye or Ajna Chakra (knowledge) has two wings on it.  According to the philosophy of Yoga there are two serpents in the body, one male and one female, the ida and the pingala.  As they are refined they move up and through the body until the reach the 3rd eye chakra, where they drink the Ambrosia or Amrit, the food of the gods.  The third eye is the Garden of Eden, literally.

10The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”

11He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 13This is why I speak to them in parables:

“Though seeing, they do not see;

though hearing, they do not hear or understand. Matt 13:

What the ancients understood was that society itself could be divided into those who think like men and those who think like women.  The Left Wing of “O-pinions” had a feminine bias, and the Right Wing had a masculine bias.  The Left side was also predisposed to being manipulated by evil which is why “sinister” means left handed and in Kabbalah the via negativa is known as the left hand path or the path of evil.  In witch craft there are two spins, Left and Right, or Widdershins & deosil (with the sun).  History has proven this, repeatedly, like a fractal.  Plato said that  democracies lead to the worst tyranny.  Obama appears to be attempting to prove this true right now as he tries to make evil equal to good, failure equal to success, and people’s issues equal to reason. He attempts to allow freedom of speech for one group while punishing it for another.  He rationalizes one group responding to words and Ideas with physical violence and he holds people to different standards concealing his narrative and operating on a concealed, unspoken, agenda.

While comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler they attempt to preempt a conversation about what they have been doing.  Turkey’s leader Erdogan models his government after Hitler’s.  Obama created ISIS and protected it, not attacking it’s oil as it used blitzkrieg warfare to snatch up land and resources to use for more war, at the same time Erdogan was buying oil from ISIS.  Syrian Immigrants in Germany are openly recruiting for ISIS on the streets as Angela Merkel’s dubious history comes into light.  Obama was supporting the rise of Neo-Nazi fascists in the Ukraine before Puttin stepped in to end it as his presence was requested there.  The Nazi movement came not out of the conservative right but out of the progressive left.  Nazi Germany was obsessed with cleanliness and health, they had the first list of carcinogens for the Nazi superman to avoid including cigarettes.

It was and is Moslems that worship to this day Adolf Hitler.  The global agenda of the Obama administration is to create an IslamoNazi hybrid ideology that will culminate in the conversion of every religion to Islam in which case religion will be irrelevant and then to create a New World Order under the Leadership of the United Nations, and to force the compliance of all of the now Fascist Dictatorship who in turn will be able to force the compliance of all of their citizens.  This is done under the guise of saving the earth from destruction of Global Warming, and therefore it is a moral act.  They are saving us from ourselves, so they aren’t motivated by self interest and the corporations aren’t attempting to solidify their authority permanently, it is an act of sacrifice on their part.  (eye roll).

The two wings of Opinion suggest that their is a choice to be made and a right to disagree.  This is harmful for the Global Fascist Agenda.  In Islam there is no right to disagree, there is no conversation, there is no vote.  There is no art because any depiction of an animal or a man is an act of Idolatry.  There is only one god, he doesn’t have a feminine counterpart (like the shekinah or holy spirit) and there is only one prophet and one message.  Do you really want to live in a world ruled by the United Nations where Saudi Arabia leads the Human Rights commission and Sharia Law (which claims to be above all other constitutions and man made laws) is granted recognition?  Think about it.

obama_brother.jpg

Advertisements

Permanent Victim Status

adam wolfe comedy

I wanted to explain how the psychopathic/female mind works when it makes superficial Aesthetic snap decisions. The female mind thinks of expanding and increasing it’s authority, it does so by usurping the authority of reason.

Now, based on my psychological models there are essentially 3 types of Authority:

Sapiential Authority— Moral Authority— Coercive Authority

These correspond to the brain in it’s 3 stages of development:

Father——-Mother——-Child

Which Correspond to:

Super Ego——Ego——Id

Now I refer to the Psychopathic mind as the Mother/Child mind.  Because psychopaths are over-coddled children, and the mind of the enabling toxic mother and the psychopathic child are comorbid with one another.  Working together to thwart reason, and steal the surplus created by the Father Principle.

The Authority of the mother exists because of the child.  Children start out as irrational emotional little creatures completely dependent on other’s for their survival.  They communicate no analytical data and only emotional data.  They are quite irrational.  But from the perspective of Mercy and Charity the Irrational Delusions of the Over Coddled Child make sense to the Mother Principle who knows that her authority comes from the existence of the child.   Since the Mother’s brain evolved to make sense of the Irrational and delusional mind of the child the emotions and desires of the child have more value or merit to her than they do to the father principle but also she is more akin to the reasoning of the Over Coddled Child than she is to that of the Father Principle or Reason which she perceives as a hostile, foreign, will.

To protect, increase, and expand her authority she must maintain the pole position preventing the relationship between reason and action.   (Coercive Authority represents not only violence/punishment or coercion but also action and survival into the future)

janus

While the Sociopathic Male brain contemplates the outside world and changes himself to make himself suitable for survival in the world.  The Psychopathic Female brain is turned away from reality and towards relationships, conversations about emotions and about people’s desires and feelings.  Because of the way the female/child brain edits their considerations sets they are ignorant of what the father (Reason) knows.  Reason, in it’s judgments, already accounts for as much Mercy and Charity as is warranted, deserved, and affordable.  Therefore the Appeal to Emotions of the Female/Child mind is also redundant and exaggerated, the female mind increases and expands her authority by usurping the Authority of Reason.

YIN AND YANG

This is easier to explain from the Chinese perspective, to explain how the Western Mind with it’s feminine bias categorizes people and therefore determines if they are deserving of Justice or Mercy.  In the Asian system, Yang-ness, Masculinity is unbroken, symbolized as an unbroken line, and Yin-ness is symbolized as a broken line.

pic1

This is how the Western Mind determines if you are worthy of Mercy, and Charity or Justice.  Failure and evil get categorized as Yin or female, and thus they are deserving of Mercy and Charity.  The Western Bias is also self loathing being suspicious of it’s own men, while at the same time reliant on them and incapable of understanding or agreeing with them because they refuse to look at what the Sociopathic Male Brains look at.  (In Joxua’s Psychological Models philosophers are “Enlightened Sociopaths”.)

The mother principle not only protects the child principle from reality, understanding, and Justice, she also protects and nurture’s it’s issues and mental diseases at the same time making the child more aggressive and narcissistic in it’s insanity.  There is a tacit prejudice in the way Mercy and Charity are abused in this perversion.  It assumes that a person or group of people are incapable of raising themselves to the same level everybody else is on, the bar for entry level.  They are incapable of being equal to everybody else under a meritocracy of reason and so they need to be admitted any way and given a handicap to compensate for their natural state of constant failure and ineptitude cause by the over coddling of the mother, but her authority is still intact because the over coddled child is still under her authority and dependent on it.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE PERMANENT VICTIM

If you study the psychology and the behavior of the permanent victim it is really quite interesting.  Permanent Victims have at the same time an inferiority complex and a superiority complex.   From their perspective they are superior because they are inferior, their over-coddling mother taught them that they win by failing, this isn’t necessarily expressed overtly but through the incentives and the sequences of events this concept is instilled in the child.  People copy whatever behaviors they see succeeding because they are Acquisitively Mimetic, people are not innately Analytical Philosophers who introspect to see if something is just.  People just want what they want and if they always get what they want they have no reason to give pause.

Now, the permanent victim feels that everything that happens to them happens to them because of their issue, whatever that might be.  “This is happening to me because I am a woman, this is happening to me because I am black.”  Whenever they don’t get everything they want they claim to be victimized because of their issue and invoke the Mother principle of Mercy and Charity.  At the same time, it has been instilled in them, that because their issues are protected they can act as the judge, jury, and executioner on their own behalf, championing themselves and defending themselves vociferously in their delusion and error.

THE SOLUTION

When I started my fiction endeavor,(https://shivastus.wordpress.com/) to reintroduce Wisdom into the literature of the world, I created a civilization known as the Zed, because they were the last civilization before the earth collapsed into anarchy.  One of the tenets of that civilization is that if you are found to be lacking, if you are incapable of contributing more of a surplus than you consume or if you commit a major infraction of the rules, if someone speaks out in your favor for mercy or charity on your part, in disagreement with every body else, then they are responsible for your failure and your fate.  Which means they rely on your resources, not those of society, and if they re-offend you get the same punishment that they do.

The most egregious abuse of Mercy and Charity almost always involves taking the surplus of those who have earned it and squandering it on those who have proven they don’t deserve it.  This is an act of theft and a sabotage of society, it punishes success and rewards failure.  And all to often those asking for Mercy and Charity on the part of others risk no personal financial loss or damage to their reputation, or the need to accomplish the outcome which they guaranteed would be the end.  This pattern in society exactly mimics my psychological models.

When nobody in society takes responsibility for their actions and results, you don’t have a society.

The Comparison Set in my Profiles.

Leonardo-da-Vinci-Vitruvian-ManWhen I am constructing a psychological profile on a person, which I do on everybody I am in relationship with, I compare the individual to the rational man, based on every exchange, action, and word.  I am sure that many people will react negatively to this idea, and that is a reflection of the impoverished state of reason and relationship which has become the norm in todays world.

It seems obvious to me that we would want to intimately understand the people that we are in relationship with, but relationships have deteriorated into superficial, personality addictions, we like someone not because of who they are but because of how they make us feel, based on the way they look or someone or something they remind us of.  People are playing characters, they aren’t being honest or authentic.  Nowadays both people in the relationship are acting like they are something they are not.

buddhaIn my psychological models, no action is necessary, so every action is meaningful. You eat because you want to live, etc.  Being that their are two types of behaviors rational and irrational there are also two types of minds, male and female or sociopathic and psychopathic.  Every interaction creates an end that is either sociopathic or psychopathic (based on how I define those terms).  Whereas, a rational person can remain consistently rational, a psychopathic person must act psychopathicly (irrationally) in order to do their will.  They think this makes them smart and unpredictable but just the opposite is true.  It is because they can’t behave rationally that they are predictable, they will try to take some unfair advantage, they will attack, they will not have a reason, and they will not warn that they are about to attack, of this you can be sure.

A reasonable person can only be defined in relationship, in relationship with reality, in relationship with other people, in conversation.  Shared states are participation, agreement, conversation, and understanding.  

vesica-pisces

Also, it depends on the environment itself, is the environment rational?  is the other person rational or are they being strategic.  To remain rational while the other person is being irrational is irrational because it is unsustainable.

A rational relationship has to be sustainable, it has to succeed, it has to create a surplus of value, not a deficit (which is to say it has to create more value than it consumes).  It has to allow all parties to do their will.  No person in the group can be given more value from the group than is sustainable based on their contribution to the group.  A rational relationship has to increase the value of the members and the members have to increase their ability to create value for the rational relationship.  This presupposes that in this rational relationship, which we eventually see is a philoish, or a philosophical family, people learn, they grow, they teach, they only relate to one another in a positive and educational way, not in a negative strategic way.  You increase the value of those around you.  You help them become rational and get better results in the world.  This is the relationship of all relationships, the original perfect idea of relationship.

Everything said can have value in one of 3 ways, it is true, it is useful, and it makes you feel better.  Of these 3 the least valuable is making you feel better, this is true of female minds including children, and they irrationally esteem this communication of positive emotional data over the other three.  Children are irrational, emotional creatures, so it is necessary to communicate to them positive emotional data that is not always true or useful until they get to an age when they are capable of being non-delusionally in relationship with reality.  This makes more sense to the female mind than it does to the male mind, because as Deborah Tannen says women ventriloquize, interpreting to the husband the emotional data communicated by the child.  Evolution compartmentalized the female mind to be more interested in and sympathetic with babies.  From the female perspective the emotional/irrational reasoning of the child is more valid than it is to the male mind which is more interested on survival.  But the end result of both instincts determines whether the relationship is rational or not.

When I build my psychological models, every deviation from reason communicates to me something about the person I am in relationship with or conversation with.  Does the person identify with reason?  If reason is their highest good, then reason informs their behavior and narrative.  How and when they deviate from rational relationship leaves traces, clues as to who they are, their psyche, their soul, how they are in relationship with the world and the individuals in the world, rationally or delusionally, authentically or strategically, psychopathicly or sociopathicly.

THE AUTHOR REFERS TO THE SOCIOPATHIC BRAIN AS THE RATIONAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL MALE BRAIN, BECAUSE OF CERTAIN PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS LIKE PARRHESIA AND AGONISM BEING SYNONYMOUS WITH PHILOSOPHY AND REASON AND PARTS OF RATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, RELATIONSHIPS AND FOUND IN LESS FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY IN FEMALE NARRATIVE, THOUGHT, AND BEHAVIOR.