This was pretty interesting, Richard Dawkins also seemed to get very tense and leaned back. His reaction was a bit much for Maher’s lame Chaplin joke. More interesting is what this unscripted moment says about Dawkinites. Richard Dawkins cult of followers also suspects that he is inclined to being a pedophile and immediately reacted to defend him and prevent the topic from being addressed. Apparently you can’t even use the word “pedophile” in the proximity of Richard Dawkins anymore.
With the concealed narrative of psychopaths their strategic communication is hard to spot because they do not openly state the logical fallacies and cognitive biases they are acting on. They insist that they are sane and rational while at the same time consistently creating a disparate impact for themselves and the people they project their sense of self onto. It is possible in rhetoric, apologetics and polemics to subtly warp and distort reality for the purpose of manipulating the minds of others.
To Bifurcate means to make categories that are false or misleading. If the person stated what they think openly it would ruin their reputation and marginalize their credibility, because they would look insane to everybody. This is why psychopaths use a concealed narrative.
In order to expose this form of strategic communication. I created some terms to make their strategy more obvious to those not skilled in debate, philosophy, and rhetoric. When deconstructing a persons narrative you want to look at the tacit categories cause of the good and cause of the bad. This deals with the way the frame events and statements, they draw an imaginary line and one thing or a group of things are always bad and the things they project their sense of self onto are always good. The Form of their conquest is the social climbing behavior they use to set the world right in their eyes. They have to keep changing the world in the same way in order to do their will. The sum of their actions have to do their genuine will.
As you observe the strategic rhetoric of Mr. Barack Obama, you will find that he consistently creates disparate impact in specifically the same way. America, Israel, white people, the police, and the military are always the cause of the bad, and violent, uneducated, brown to black people are always the cause of the good. Not only are they not responsible for the evil they do, they are not doing evil, and if they are doing evil it is only because the evil white people are forcing them to do it by not laying down and letting evil (I mean good) run rampant through the world.
Obama’s Highest form of the Good, His God, is also concealed or openly lied about. He is only a christian in name, not indeed, you remember the rhetoric of Reverand Wright?
The whole thing about psychopathic narrative is that it switches. The story keeps changing. Obama twice had the Freudian slip saying that he was a Muslim, he chose the most Imam like “christian” pastor he could find. The only part of Obama’s narrative and behavior that doesn’t keep changing is the same behavior that he keeps falling all over himself to keep quiet.
I can think of another certain person who also hated Israel who sympathized with Muslims and hated Israel and the Jews… He had a tiny little mustache.