In the above video you see an incident in which Bill Maher physically kicks a protestor out of his audience. His Liberal Progressive audience applauds enthusiastically. Bill Maher actually brags about this incident and has the footage used to advertise his show.
Now lets switch gears to Donald Trump and the current controversies and compare the bias and accusations. Trumps audience members, Secret Service, and Security have thrown out audience members or in some instances attacked other audience members. Bill Maher has a few hundred people in his audience, Donald Trump has tens of thousands of people at his rallies.
While Bill Maher personally silences protestors, Donald Trump does not personally do so. While Donald Trump gets constant threats on his life Bill Maher doesn’t suffer the same situation. While people do not use this incident to characterize Bill Maher poorly they do use these incidents to characterize Trump poorly, including Bill Maher who for some reason stopped doing comedy though he still claims to be a comedian.
If you were to use the argument that you have to allow freedom of speech Bill Maher is equally guilty. You have to ask yourself if a group of people has come together at a specific period of time for an express purpose does another individual or group have the right to hijack that forum for an antagonistic purpose in order to thwart the will of the majority? If the size of the group that assembles determines the importance of their effort does that not mean that Trump’s rallies have more of a right to silence dissent than does Bill Maher?
Realizing that Donald did not himself bodily assail anybody they try to say that his speech created an environment for this kind of conduct to flourish. The same people that make this argument insist that groups like Black Lives Matter and Islam are not responsible for their own hateful rhetoric & ideology. Islam is not responsible for the fact that it uses the word “terror” and encourages it’s members to terrorize non mooslems and states that Mohammed was made successful through terrorism. Barack Hussein Obama insists that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam he might just as well tell us that Yellowness has nothing to do with Bananas. Black Lives Matter isn’t responsible for their overtly racist message that ONLY black lives matter, while they ignore the fact that Black people kill more Black people than any other ethnic group. And Black people kill far more white people than white people kill black people.
In the first case they conflate in order to demonize the person they don’t like by framing him as always THE CAUSE OF THE BAD. In the second case the bifurcate and obfuscate in order to protect the reputation they are attempting to associate with always being THE CAUSE OF THE GOOD. On top of this you see the levelling of false accusations, for example the lie that the KKK and David Duke endorsed Trump when they did not and he’s not responsible for their actions anyway. Still others create these theoretical scenarios and tell us these bizarre imaginary vignettes of the future of what will happen if he gets elected president. They ignore the fact that NOBODY thought Obama could have brought us to this precipice of human extinction or that he would be the worst president in history or that he would threaten the very survival of the existence of the United States of America.
At the same time Liberal Progressives try to fork responsibility off their own plates and onto the plates of Conservatives. Islam is not responsible for the Evil that they do. Black people are not responsible for their disproportionate violent crimes. They transfer responsibility for the bad behavior of these groups and assert that the behavior is justified because of the Presupposed and Reified “Victimhood” of these groups even though if you go to parts of the world where they are not minorities you find the same bad behavior exists there in a more concentrated form and they are much more racist and prejudice in places where they are dominant. All of this is done to excuse ideas and actions that should be confronted and reformed, but how do you do that when people are willing to use physical violence to silence your voice and change your mind? The only way you can defend yourself or change the tide is through Violent Revolution if people refuse to recognize the Authority of Reason. So because the people who are the problem and who are causing the problem refuse to back down and conform the rhetoric on both sides escalates but blame is not equally shared and often misattributed.
The bias is created by the Soft Bigotry of Low Expectation. Because we consider one group harmless because they can’t compete on a level playing field without cheating we create disparate impact in their favor by holding them to a different standard and allowing them to use “Evil Means”. In doing so we are not only enabling their Worser Demons and the Lowest Element in their ranks we are encouraging Evil itself. It becomes normal to say that one group of people is allowed to be self interested, to protect themselves and pursue their own success and happiness but it is not okay for another group of people to do the same. This is the very definition of prejudice. Liberal Progressives have and Ideological Fascists have redefined Prejudice as something that only white people are guilty of and all of their success comes from “White Privilege” these terms reify ideas that can’t be substantiated and haven’t been scientifically proven and they come from the same sources the veritable #LynchMob that is trying to persecute people and organizations as “Science Deniers” when the Science hasn’t been proven.
“Do not go gentle into that good night, old age should rage and burn at the closing of the day; Rage, Rage, at the dying of the Light.” ~ Dylan Thomas