The Chosen People of the God of Reason

proto-indo-european

The words “Practice” & “Process” come from the word “Praxis”.  In order to be a rational person you have to have a valid Philosophy (which is your soul) & that Philosophy has to inform your behavior.  Your Philosophy can be falsified by being wrong, being arbitrary or invalid (for example if your philosophy didn’t apply to everything or could only be used to prove the Philosopher correct), or the person who claims to subscribe to the philosophy not observing the Praxis of the philosophy.  Due Process is based on the idea that

NOTHING CAN BE PROVEN IRRATIONALLY .

The word “Trident” means three teeth, the Hebrew Letter “Shin” is symbolized by a tooth.  This goes back to an Ancient Metaphor used for psychology that existed in India and Egypt before it existed in modern Christianity.  The Father, The Son & the Holy Spirit.  This represents the Id, the Ego, & the Super-ego in the human psyche of the individual but also in humanity as a whole.  God the Father is the Authority of Reason, God the Mother (Shekinah/Shakti) as Mercy & Charity which is more necessary when children are young and completely dependent on others to provide for them.  At this age Children are also not capable of being responsible for their mistakes, but the ancient people’s had an age of accountability which ended the Authority of the Mother & at which time the child should become a responsible citizen who respects the Law of the Land.  If they are not capable of doing this then they will not be a citizen but a slave or the sub caste, the tamas guna in India.  God the Son represents Coercive Authority of Punishment and Action.

The philologist Nietzsche came to the same conclusion when he said,

“Christianism is Platonism for the masses.”

Not only does this show a common thread between all legitimate religions, it demonstrates a connection to the Math Cults that possessed the secrets for building Great Civilizations from scratch based on Rational Relationship & understood the psychology of MANKIND.

When a man creates a philosophy and others adopt that philosophy it becomes a religion.  People that adopt that philosophy adopt the soul of the original philosopher and become part of that Soul Group.

Explanation of Jesus Creative Days & Perspective of the Pythagorean Math Cults.

☧SI

Untitled

Pythagorean symbol
The first four numbers symbolize the harmony of the spheres and the Cosmos as:
(1) Unity (Monad)
(2) Dyad – Power – Limit/Unlimited (peras/apeiron)
(3) Harmony (Triad)
(4) Kosmos (Tetrad).[2]
The four rows add up to ten, which was unity of a higher order (The Dekad).
The Tetractys symbolizes the four elements—fire, air, water, and earth.
The Tetractys represented the organization of space:
the first row represented zero dimensions (a point)
the second row represented one dimension (a line of two points)
the third row represented two dimensions (a plane defined by a triangle of three points)
the fourth row represented three dimensions (a tetrahedron defined by four points)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetractys#Kabbalist_symbol
VVV—TAKE A LOOK AT GROUP—VVV
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/106416678024919034801

View original post

Deconstructing the Strategic Rhetoric of Richard Dawkins.

sneaky dick

The popularity & influence of Richard Dawkins is quickly diminishing as people become hip to his cunning strategy to usurp the Religious & Moral authority of Judeo-Christianity and indoctrinate everyone into Scientism.  It is noteworthy that Hitler made science the state religion and was under the delusion that he was doing science (scientific socialism).  Richard Dawkins famously defended Hitler when he said: “If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”, Richard Dawkins replied, “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”

While he asks leading questions that invite people to think that morality can have anything to do with Atheism he doesn’t offer an explanation for how morality evolved.  While suggesting that humans are innately moral without religion he doesn’t offer any explanation of what morality is, & what is moral.  Does the morality of people from Papua New Guinea that allows them to eat other humans constitute morality?  This is also happening in Islam in Syria and in South East Asia in Myanmar.  Do the Muslim virtues of child brides and cutting off the heads of infidels constitute morality?  It is of note that he ignores the fact that the Sabbath was a human rights coupe and that in order to make the first holiday so that any person wouldn’t have to work 7 days a week or compete with someone who worked 7 days a week or who owned slaves and forced them all to work seven days a week god had to be asserted as a reason why a day of rest was necessary and people had to be forced to comply.  While it is obvious that some psychopathic authoritarians took enforcing the laws to seriously the intent of the original law was obvious and good.  It is also of note that stoning was a common punishment back then and just because it was mentioned in the bible doesn’t mean that God or Religion invented stoning.  Judeo-Christianity started when the Hebrews were individuating their identity from that of the Babylonian/Persians.  In Jesus time it was these same people who were using the practice that Jesus frowned on. He told his disciples not to go to the Romans or even enter a Samaritan camp.  Today there is one religion that is stoning people.

It would be one thing if this was the first time he had used this strategy, but it isn’t, he repeated and benchmarked the very same devious argument he used in the opening chapter of his book the GOD DELUSION (https://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/the-hypnotic-narrative-of-richard-dawkins/).  Richard Dawkins must think himself quite clever when he equivocates all religions with each other, excuses Muslims from personal responsibility, & then says that Christians are actually being “self-Centered” when they try to “curry favor” with their god, & that is their motivation for doing good in life.  Notice that he only asks inviting questions, he doesn’t communicate transparently explaining what constitutes virtue & morality and how those virtues came to exist.  He suggests that humans might be innately moral which tacitly suggests that all virtues humans possess are equally moral.  Christopher Hitchens used this same strategy with his Hitchens challenge (https://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/christopher-hitchens-challenge-dissolved/Atheism is not a moral system. Atheism is amoral.  To suggest that you can have a society in which people pick and choose what constitutes their morality is anarchy.  You can’t actually get people to agree on what the laws of the state will be and you can’t force compliance.  You cannot rely on the innate morality of people and have a successful society.  If atheist picking and choosing of their values allows them to lie, or communicate in a crafty and scheming way then their testimony is worthless.  Now that I have shown you his modus operandi, and how he obfuscates using arbitrary polemics in the form of false dichotomies, conflates, conceals, and asks leading questions let’s see if you can see his strategy now.  Let’s see if you notice the repetition of the exact same wily tactics.

“They were not in and of themselves evil, they were following their faith. And faith is pernicious, because it can do that to people,” (referring to the 9/11 hijackers)
This is called the fundamental attribution error, not only is he removing them from responsibility of their own actions he is transferring the essence of evilness from the individual to Religion itself, remember that he conflates all religions with each other, & equivocates between all religions.
“If you’re good because you want to carry favor with God, if you’re good because you want to avoid going to Hell, or if you want to go to Heaven, that’s a rather ignoble, self-centered reason to be good,” 
Notice that he is only criticizing his understanding of someone else’s stance while simultaneously presupposing their narrative and offering testimony on it.  As a deist my god is the faculty of reason in man.  My god represents my own highest good.  As such I use the concept of god as a tool to reward myself internally when I have strived to be perfected in the eyes of the god I conceive of.  A rather nuanced and sophisticated approach to the use of the science of self control and self discipline through the use of a tool thought technology.  Furthermore you will notice that Richard Dawkins has precluded religion as a conscious self manipulation.  He also doesn’t explain what is the proper incentive or motivation is for being good.
“I fully accept that an awful lot of good deeds are done by people who happen to be religious, but I think it’s rather insulting to suggest that you need religion in order to be good.”
This is a tacit emotional appeal.  He is inviting his cult to feel insulted and therefore attacked by religious ideas.  This presupposes that the person feeling insulted has the authority to feel insulted which presupposes that they are moral.  Remember the Richard Dawkins said “I can’t bring myself to condemn mild paedophilia.”  When he was attacked for defending mild pedophilia he responded in tweet saying, “Are you really saying you don’t see the difference between putting your hands in a child’s clothes & raping a child to death.”  In linguistics we have noticed that people can escalate or de-escalate rhetoric by word choice.  What Dawkins did above was remove the original sexual nature of the molestation he was originally referring to.  Notice there was no sexual content or intent.  Your hand accidentally ends up in a child’s clothes.  He follows this up with an arbitrary comparison set in order to make the first activity seem less evil in comparison.  This is how he attempts to manipulate people into agreeing with him.
In the interview Richard Dawkins attempts to thwart the argument that Adolf Hitler was an atheist, insisting that his crimes can’t be associated with Atheism but can be blamed on his being a Catholic.  Ignoring the fact that Germany at that time only really elected Catholics.  And pretending that these quotes by Adolf Hitler don’t exist… (http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Quotations_on_Islam_from_Notable_Non-Muslims#Adolf_Hitler)

The manipulative charismatic leader of the Dawkinite cult recently said in an interview in Ireland that the 9/11 hijackers weren’t responsible for their actions but that Religion makes people do evil things. Presupposing that Islam is a Religion & not a death cult he went on to equivocate between all religions & assert that Christians who do good deeds to “curry favor” with God are “self-centered”. He argues that it is insulting to suggest that people can’t be good without Religion but fails to offer a scientific explanation for the origins of morality.

“Palestinians” are Philistines, Literally.

philistine

Muslims claim to be an Abrahamic religion and insist that they are of the Judeo-Christian dispensation. They claim that Allah is the same as Yahweh. The word “Palestine” however comes from the word Philistine which means “to divide” or “invader” they were even mentioned by Josephus. The Philistine cities lost their independence to Assyria. They were subsequently absorbed into the Babylonian and Persian empires, and disappeared as a distinct ethnic group by the late 5th century BC. Persia/Babylon became synonymous with the Arabic culture who are descendants of Ishmael, who is described as being “a Wild Donkey man whose hand will be against all of his brothers.” On May 15, 1948, the day the British Mandate over Palestine ended, the armies of five neighboring Arab states invaded the new Israel, which had declared its independence the previous day. The invasion was heralded by an Egyptian air attack on Tel Aviv.

Genesis 16: 11The angel of the Lord also said to her: “You are now pregnant and you will give birth to a son.  You shall name him Ishmael, for the Lord has heard of your misery.  He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

On May 15, 1948, the day the British Mandate over Palestine ended, the armies of five neighboring Arab states invaded the new State of Israel, which had declared its independence the previous day. The invasion, heralded by an Egyptian air attack on Tel Aviv, was vigorously resisted. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Invade.html

“Palestine” from Latin Palestina (name of a Roman province), from Greek Palaistine (Herodotus), from Hebrew Pelesheth “Philistia, land of the Philistines.” Revived as an official political territorial name 1920 with the British mandate.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Palestine

The etymology of the word into English is from Old French Philistin, from Classical Latin Philistinus, found in the writings of Josephus, from Late Greek Philistinoi (Phylistiim in the Septuagint) found in the writings by Philo, from Hebrew Plištim, (e.g. 1 Samuel 17:36; 2 Samuel 1:20; Judges 14:3; Amos 1:8), “people of Plešt” (“Philistia”); cf. Akkadian Palastu, Egyptian Parusata.

Biblical scholars often trace the word to the Semitic root p-l-š (Hebrew: פלש‎) which means “to divide,” or “invader”[14] The name of the Philistines in their own language is not known. However, the Bible also relates them as the people of Caphtor (Hebrew: כפתור‎, e.g., Jeremiah 47:4). “Caphtor” is not of Hebrew or Semitic origin, which supports the possibility that this word is similar to the name they called themselves.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philistines#Etymology

The Bible paints the Philistines as the main enemy of the Israelites (prior to the rise of the Assyrian Empire between the 10th century BC and late 7th century BC) with a state of almost perpetual war between the two peoples. The Philistine cities lost their independence to Assyria, and revolts in following years were all crushed. They were subsequently absorbed into the Babylonian and Persian empires, and disappeared as a distinct ethnic group by the late 5th century BC.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philistines#Deuteronomistic_history

Muslim Debate Strategies.

dont-screw-the-ayatollah-04

I’m going to be adding to this for the next couple of days, in order to show the psyche of the Muslim & how they behave in relationship and in conversation.  Because I am constantly trolled by Muslims on Twitter and G+ when I am reminded of one of their strategies I will add it to this and extend this blog.

LIE, LIE, LIE!

Psychopaths are pathological liars.  Not only does the Quran state that Islam is based on a lie in another scripture it claims that the Muslim God is the best liar.  (Qur’an 3:54, Qur’an 7:99) Taqiyya & Kitman are but a few dispensations that Muslims have for promoting, defending, and concealing the truth about Islam and its intentions through lying.  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman) Taqiyya & Hudna are combined in a false Muslim Cease fire in which they make an agreement to stop fighting in order to rest for a surprise attack later.

IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE TO AGREE

They engage you in these mind-numbing circular arguments, if you don’t agree with them then you have failed to grasp what is essentially Islam.  They will keep on redirecting your attention to scriptures in the Quran like a mother trying to change the way you feel about the thing that they keep on directing your attention to.  For me this is one of the most annoying strategies because it is a complete waste of time and it is meant to wear you out.  In logic this is called “argumentum ad nauseam”, unfortunately it can work on weaker minds, especially feminine ones.  They confuse the pleasantness of the person repeating themselves with the actual content of the Quran and the spirit of Islam.  Muslims might know how to manipulate the Feminine Bias of the Western mind better than any other people.  Remember that under a Meritocracy of pleasantness you can be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly but you are wrong for speaking the truth if it is unpleasant.

SELF CONTRADICTION

Because of the fact that the Quran and Mohammed contradict themselves completely at different times, as though Mad Moe was bi-polar, Muslims can lie and say the Quran teaches this or that.  Yes, but it also teaches the exact opposite, so as a philosophy it is invalid because it is self-contradictory.  If you read it carefully it says that real Muslims fight, the ones that stay at home are not as good.Quran (4:95)  Fighting was prescribed by Allah for Muslims. Quran (2:216) The philosophy of Islam is  Jihad centric and the entire religion is organized as an invasive war cult that spreads it’s ideology through lies, manipulation, back door deals, strategic positioning, and then inevitably, physical violence. Quran (3:56)  If you examine the names of Muslim terrorist groups it is a direct reflection of the actual philosophy of the “Religion” Boko Haram (Western Knowledge Forbidden) Taliban (The Students)  Jamaat ul Fuqra (Community of the Impoverished).  Zakat, Muslim tax, one of the 5 pillars of Islam is used to fund terrorism.  The meaning of Jamaat ul Fuqra demonstrates the connection between Zakat and the merciful feeding of the poor in Islam.  Muslims also solicit disillusioned and depressed youth in prisons and out of mosques for suicide missions.

EVERYBODY IS A MUSLIM

Islam claims to be a Judeo-Christian Abrahamic religion after saying that the Jews and the Christians lied, but Allah is the best liar.  They think the Jews and Christians lied because Moses and Jesus were foretold but Mad Moe was not so they stupidly think the bible was altered.  They twist the rolls of Cain and Abel making Cain the good guy the victim of mind control of his brother who forced him to kill himself with the powers of his brain.

cat

They reverse the rolls of Ishmael and Isaac, making Ishmael the good guy who received the blessing of god.  Adam was a Muslim, Jesus was a Muslim, everybody important was a Muslim, even though Noah obviously brought pigs on the ark which is haram, and Jesus turned water into wine, haram.  Oh, and one more thing, all babies are born Muslim, which means that they from their perspective are more the parents of your children than you are….  (let that sink in)

YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND IF YOU DON’T SPEAK ARABIC

Even if you did learn Arabic they would say you have failed to comprehend it.  The Arabic Language presupposes a caste system, including slaves, that allows different interpretations depending on who is being spoken to.  The Word “Haram”, for example, means Forbidden but it also is the place where the Women, Wives, Concubines, & Sex Slaves sleep.  It is also where Male “Family Members” are allowed to enter for Recreation and other reasons.  “Boko Haram” literally means, Western Knowledge is Forbidden, which is why they kidnap, rape, and murder little black girls that have been given Western Education.

AGGRESSIVE NARCISSISM

Psychopathy is also synonymous with aggressive narcissism.  In order to understand Muslim debate strategy you have to understand where their feelings of Superiority come from.  First of all, Adam was the first man and he was Muslim. From their perspective wherever they stand they are their own caliphate and they are above the law of the land.  As a linguistic philosopher I am a soft linguistic determinist.  If you deconstruct the psyche of the Arabic language what you find is that it presupposes and Arrogant, Aristocratic superiority.  The language itself puts on airs of royalty.  It is the language of liars.  Each word is given so many different interpretations because of who is being spoken too that it is impossible to nail it down into a single specific meaning or intent.  Whereas English has become the Lingua-Franca of Science, Arabic is the Lingua-Franca of arrogant, narcissistic, liars who think themselves kings.  Indeed what you will find in the Muslim world is that Muslims never pick up their own filth because they consider themselves royalty.  In Saudi Arabia the import Abeed (black slaves, yeah, it’s like that one word we can’t say) to pick up their garbage for them.

DEVOLVING

Muslims are the largest & fastest growing population of people on earth.  They are also one of the most illiterate.  They translate fewer books into Arabic than any other culture on the planet including Greece which translates 2 or 3 times more books into Greek.  This is part of their strategy for keeping a large society controlled.  There is a direct correlation between stupidity and violence.  Muslims only have one book the Quran (as well as the Hadith and the Sacred Hadith).  They have a priest class that can read and tells the illiterate masses what to think, say, and do.  You have to realize that this is essentially the opposite of evolution, resurrecting the priest class which hasn’t existed seen since Ancient Egypt.

DON’T PATRONIZE ME

There might be nothing more annoying than being condescended to by a stupid person that is obviously lying to you .  Because of the nature of the Arabic language, Arabic epigenetics, and the psychology of the Muslim religion, Muslims presuppose their superiority and their own correctness.  That means like a toxic overbearing parent that doesn’t respect your boundaries they believe they have the right to lie to you, manipulate you, help themselves to anything you have, & refuse to acknowledge when you have proven them wrong. remember please that Muslims are some of the worst parents on the planet.  They have the highest occurrence of child molestation for which their are provisions in the Quran and they have the highest incidents of honor killings.  So you are the abused child in relationship with psychopathic, overbearing, schizophrenic parent, when you are in relationship or conversation with a Muslim. Persia has always been synonymous with Tyranny which has always been against democracy, freedom, and Civilization.

WHY ARE YOU TELLING ME???

Yet another one of their cloying, insipid strategies the “Moderate Muslims” repeatedly tell you that Islam is a religion of peace.  Why are they wasting their breath telling me?  Wouldn’t their time be better spent ministering to the Jihadis?  They aren’t exactly hiding on social media.  Don’t tell me that child rape, torture, and beheading are against Islam, tell the Muslims that are doing it.  The moderate Muslims can’t even defend themselves from the radical Muslims, why, the hell, should I listen to them???  Their arguments are contradicted and negated by the violent Muslims as well as the Muslim scriptures so they are therefore irrelevant and their testimony is invalid and a waste of time.  The only way the behavior makes any sense is if you assume they are trying to get you to lower your guard so that when you are attacked  you aren’t prepared to defend yourself.  Seriously, do yourself a favor and don’t waste your time talking to these people or anybody that associates with them.

I AM A VICTIM of ISLAMOPHOBIA!!!

Act like a victim while you are victimizing.  Take a gander at this little piece of bat shit insanity.  Muslims act like a persecuted minority everywhere in the world where they are not the majority.  Everywhere they are the majority the persecute EVERY MINORITY!  Muslims are not responsible for the evil they do.  Everybody else is responsible for the evil they do.  They are not responsible for being sane or tolerant of criticism of their prophet or their religion.  They are incapable of scrutinizing or controlling themselves.  Moham-head was justified in killing the Jews because they attacked him by existing and being evil & the Jewish woman that poisoned him is evidence to that fact.  She didn’t poison him because she felt victimized by his serial murder of Jews, she attacked him because Jews are evil.

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, the mother of the suspected Boston bombers, brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnayev, gestures as she attends a news conference in Makhachkala on April 25, 2013. The mother of the two brothers suspected of carrying out the Boston bombings on Thursday launched an impassioned attack on the US authorities over the death of one of her sons, as her husband planned to return to the United States find out what happened. The parents of the two suspects Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, spoke to reporters at a news conference in the Russian region of Dagestan where they were living when the Boston marathon bombings took place. AFP PHOTO / NEWS TEAM / SERGEI RASULOVSERGEI RASULOV/AFP/Getty Images
Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, the mother of the suspected Boston bombers, brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnayev, gestures as she attends a news conference in Makhachkala on April 25, 2013. The mother of the two brothers suspected of carrying out the Boston bombings on Thursday launched an impassioned attack on the US authorities over the death of one of her sons, as her husband planned to return to the United States find out what happened. The parents of the two suspects Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, spoke to reporters at a news conference in the Russian region of Dagestan where they were living when the Boston marathon bombings took place. AFP PHOTO / NEWS TEAM / SERGEI RASULOVSERGEI RASULOV/AFP/Getty Images

 

The Psychopathology of Liberal Progressives.

bahar

I am going to use Bahar Mustafa, diversity officer at the Goldsmith University of London as the poster child for Liberal Progressives, she is, from my humble perspective the perfect specimen as I see all of the psychosis manifest in her in perfect proportion.  Indeed she appears to have fathomed the depths of Liberalism and followed it to it’s final conclusion.  In her manifesto she says:

“I represent the most traditionally unrepresented. In an unequal society where power relations in the wide of the world prevail like the institutions, how can one possibly represent all the needs of all people and people by virtue of their gender, race, and class have opposing interests.”  http://www.europeanguardian.com/home/87-uncategorised/opinion/209-bahar-mustafa-s-speech-by-a-white-nationalist-woman

She was recently arrested but you have to remember this wasn’t an isolated event, she has been doing this for a while and escalating the intensity of her rhetoric.  Following the example of other Muslim apologists in Universities in the United States she seems to have targeted White Males, Conservatives, and Christians as the object of her hatred.  She names specifically “cisgender” white men.

Cisgender (often abbreviated to simply cis) describes related types of gender identity perceptions, where individuals’ experiences of their own gender agree with the sex they were assigned at birth.[1] Sociologists Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook define cisgender as a label for “individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity”.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender

That means white men who do not feel identify with the sex they were born with and are not ashamed of it and don’t apologize for it.  She sees herself as a champion and leader of her issues. Paul Ekman, who created the science of Microexpressions, said that being in a permanent refractory state (being in a state where your issues or traumas are constantly hyper vigilant) is synonymous with being insane.  Dr. Stylianos Atechlys said, “Obsession is demonic possession.”  I have coined the phrase “Puritannical Obsessions” in reference to the psychosis manifested by the likes of Adolf Hitler.  Hitler was obsessed with purity as a child he sported a cornflower in his cap to show he was in favor of a “Pure” Germany.  The problem with puritanical obsession is that they are not aware of the law of diminished returns. Which means absolute purity can be approached but never reached.  As you reach that point beyond which no more purity can be reached, increased investment in that goal doesn’t yield any better result.  You squander your resources and begin to drift into insanity.  Dr. Atechlys also said “Evil is the exaggeration of good.”

If you examine the case of Bahar, you realize that she was obsessed with her hatred of White men which in her mind was synonymous with the Lowest form of her Bad or her Satan, she demonized them as the Cause of the Bad.  The opposite of her Devil was everything that was not the devil.  What is interesting about this psychosis is that instead of starting with her Highest form of the Good or her God, she started with the thing she hated the most and wanted to demonize.  This is evidenced by her tacit acceptance of the adage, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.  She didn’t self falsify or inspect her behavior for self referential inconsistencies.  She wanted everybody that wasn’t a straight white man to have everything that they wanted and assumed that straight white men were somehow preventing everybody else from having what they wanted.  She then entered into the “final solution” stage of her psychosis, if white men were only eliminated everybody would be happy and have what they wanted.

A contrarian is a person who takes up a contrary position, especially a position that is opposed to that of the majority, regardless of how unpopular it may be.[1] Contrarian styles of argument and disagreement have historically been associated with radicalism and dissenthttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrarian

This is symptomatic of the Secular Liberal Agenda.  Unlike most liberals, Bahar was stupid enough to voice what she was thinking while most liberals conceal it, deny it, and act on it tacitly.  These people don’t have any solutions all they have is problems.  They don’t have a positive existence which means they don’t live FOR something they are defined by what they are against.  They are consumed by hatred and live a lie acting like they are full of love and aren’t doing what they are doing.  Presupposing their own goodness  they give themselves license to stoop to any means in order to accomplish their task.  They have no control over how creepy they let themselves get.  They take no responsibility for their results and they will never admit their failure.  They can’t even defend themselves logically because their is no logic behind what they do, only morbid emotionality and obsession.  She literally took every single position that she categorized as divergent from the thing that she hated.  They are all unique or not normal, exactly like each other.  People like this not only can’t examine themselves they are constantly trying to get away from themselves….

“Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”  ~Plato

11052409_421860527994850_4844266799481785275_o.jpg
Bahar Mustafa “Moral Atheist” & Liberal Progressive.

From Who’s Perspective is Ben Carson Wrong?

BEN1

I wanted to point something out in this most recent attack on Ben Carson.  This fake mock outrage about his comments.  The presupposition is that he said something wrong.  It is wrong because it was insensitive, this presupposes a tacit emotional appeal.  What is concealed is this:  From the perspective of those for whom what he said was wrong, What is the solution???  What is the correct answer??? In order to have the authority to say that he is wrong you have to know what the solution is otherwise you don’t have the authority to insinuate that he is wrong.  The funny thing is it isn’t even really stated that he is wrong, their is just this stupid mock outrage that other people mimic.
Deborah Tannen the Linguistic philosopher created the science on Male & female communication rituals.  They have a joke about the different way that men and women think and communicate:
A husband and wife are in bed.  She says, “boy I am really thirsty right now.”  He says, “Ok, I will get you a glass of water.”  She protests, “HONEY!!!”  He pauses and gets back into bed remembering his training on how women communicate, that they don’t want the solution they actually want to know that you feel the same way they do.  He says, “I’m sorry, Sweety, I remember this time when I was really thirsty too.”
The hidden subject is that Ben is considered wrong because like a man he thinks in term of the solution to the problem instead of sharing the feminine, victimized, emotional state.  He is suggesting tacitly that we as a Nation need to be more masculine and more about the solution.  This is yet another example of how the Feminine Bias of the Western mind is being manipulated by Liberal Progressives and Democrats.  It is conscious, strategic, and intentional.

ben3

Guilty knowledge & Liberal Psychology

bill maher

This was pretty interesting, Richard Dawkins also seemed to get very tense and leaned back.  His reaction was a bit much for Maher’s lame Chaplin joke.  More interesting is what this unscripted moment says about Dawkinites.  Richard Dawkins cult of followers also suspects that he is inclined to being a pedophile and immediately reacted to defend him and prevent the topic from being addressed.  Apparently you can’t even use the word “pedophile” in the proximity of Richard Dawkins anymore.  :/