Strategic Communication


As a psycholinguist I spend a lot of time listening to narrative.  My psychological models are based on how male brains and female brains communicate with one another, how they are in relationship with each other and themselves.  People play rolls they see themselves as characters and they are both writing themselves into a story, there own story.  All narrative is doxography or point of view and it give clues as to the character or roll a person is playing.  The problem is that relationship in the west is a kind of asymetrical warfare.

Asymmetric warfare is war between belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly, or whose strategy or tactics differ significantly.

Normative social judgments have become more and more reified and exaggerated, society has a feminine bias, and women and psychopaths in relationship take advantage of this.  Stupidity, insanity, failure, ineptitude, weakness, and irrationality all get categorized as feminine and are protected by society under the Feminine Moral Authority of Mercy and Charity.  We have all heard the phrase, “be the bigger man,” used to suggest that when someone is acting irrationally or emotionally and everybody knows they are wrong the moral and correct thing to do is to let them get away with it.  The problem is, for psychopaths this enables the behavior, incentivizing it and encouraging it, furthermore, people being aquisitively mimetic will copy the behavior they see being rewarded.

I see the root of this slide into the collapse of society and insanity in the way people communicate and reason.  When I made an effort to learn all of the logical fallacies and cognitive biases, I came to the conclusion that we were basically talking about reason and unreason, delusion and non- delusion.  How the female mind is in relationship with the male mind.  If you want to sound like a woman use every cognitive bias and logical fallacy all of the time, and never make an effort to detect your errors or admit when you were wrong.  Rationality is about being correctly in relationship with the outside world, not imagining that you are living in a magickal fairy tale where you are a Disney Princess and everything is about you and for your benefit.


strategic communication

Assertions are the masculine part of language and Questions are the feminine part of language.  If you listen to people speaking they don’t speak correctly, which is to say rationally, they speak strategically.  Both the feminine part of the conversation and the masculine part of the conversation are corrupt, which is a reflection of society.  Instead of trying to relate to one another functionally and rationally they relate strategically in order to socially climb on top of one another.  A passive aggressive battle in a race to the bottom.  People don’t evaluate themselves correctly, they don’t reason correctly, they don’t relate correctly, they don’t think correctly, and they don’t act correctly, instead everybody races around trying to one up each other in a douchey attempt to attain a sense of victory against relationship.  A bunch of retards fighting over who gets to hump the door knob.

If you listen to the way people discourse online, and I blame Richard Dawkins and his large group of online trolls more perhaps than any other group although feminists and other groups are to blame as well, the majority of the narrative is useless and non-informative and non-educational.  Why do these people waste their time to waste the time of other people?  Instead of unleashing the Highest Common Good, they would rather be passive aggressive, manipulative, covertly hostile, and emotionally abusive.  How is that making the world a better place?  How are Atheists proving themselves morally superior by engaging in such childish antics?  I realize that many of them aren’t capable of doing anything more because that is the level they are on and they are doomed to be forever on that level, but I challenge the intelligent Atheists to exert an influence on the Emotionally Morbid Atheists to be positive, and rational in their discourse instead of causing division and not allowing a higher level of discourse to be present on the internet.  Also I condemn Atheists for operating on a meritocracy of god hate and not falsifying themselves or correcting themselves when they have been falsified by a religious person.  Atheists hate the smart religious people including deists who worship reason MORE than they hate silly fundamentalist Christians.  Not only does that not make any sense it is despicable and evil.

Women Described as Elektrons


I am going to describe the female mind in terms of my Organic Computer Theory and in terms of my experiences and meditations.  Women are like electrons in that they have a negative charge, I am speaking about women in general, not all women specifically, this negative charge comes from their desire to be the center of attention, to be pretty, to be admired.  It also comes from the way in which the female brain is arranged, it want’s things to be done for it by merit of it’s being pretty.  It thinks in terms of it’s desires, and needs and the desires and needs of those she projects her sense of self onto.  Like electrons, women can leap off unpredictably at any time in any direction.  In order for the  Protons in the nucleus to attract an electron they have to have a positive charge or be in an excited state.  They have to have a surplus that is attractive to the electron.  The more surplus they possess the more electrons they will attract.

The peculiar thing about the female mind is that women think they are the center of the Nucleus, they think they are the reason for the season, they think the relationship is about themselves, and they think with the powers of their femininity and powers of attraction they are generating all the value that the relationship is creating.  They edit their consideration set not to think about the world outside of the atom, or how their behavior in that relationship affects the Atoms relationship with the surrounding environment, they only think about getting as much from the relationship as they can, and they are only interested in the relationship in so far as they can get from it and socially climb in the relationship.

It is the way women behave in relationship that is robbing the Western World of Value and destroying not only the family unit but the very fabric of society.  Women view men as disposable, bouncing from relationship to relationship, competing with other women to see how much they can get from a man, and using their relationships with men to establish dominance over other women.  Ask yourself, What kind of men participate with a game that is rigged against them?  And the men that are determined to compete and win on a slanted playing field, how are they generating their surplus?  Not by creating value for society, that is for sure.  Not by doing honest work.  Women, like electrons, don’t take responsibility for the over all success in the end.  They don’t think about creating solutions and relationships that benefit everybody.


One of the things I observed as I was studying the narrative between men and women to see how male and female brains were in relationship with one another was the feminine use of “We” and “you”.  When women were demanding the participation of the man for their benefit they would say, “we need to do this,”  but when the man asked for her participation in something that needed to be done to maximize value for the relationship the response almost always was,”you need to use your own resources to make that happen.”  The female mind presupposes the surplus of someone else to get what she wants.  She enters into relationship not to create value for everyone, just herself, and those who expand and increase her authority.


The ancient Greeks knew much more about human psychology than we do today, that is why they had an age of accountability to mark the end of the authority of the Mother.  In the case of daughters, the daughter would get married and then her husband would be her authority.  In the case of sons the Father would become the authority and in the Gymnasium the father would teach the son the laws governing, combat, finance, and good form in business and law.  The son would become a conscious and responsible citizen of the polis.  The reason that modern, western, society is collapsing is because the Authority of the Mother in the form of Mercy and Charity, never cease.  A person commits a crime and they say “I wasn’t responsible, I didn’t know.”  And this argument is used as a mantle to protect evil as evil people avail themselves of it more aggressively and frequently than do reasonable people.

Unless you can make women aware of what they are doing and how they are doing it, this process will never be arrested.  Women are naturally not inclined to self scrutiny, or self control, or self discipline, those are masculine virtues.  To quote myself Psychopaths have to do things psychopathicly, in order to do their will.  Likewise, Women have to do things femininely in order to do their will.


Women are aggressive in the relationship and submissive towards society, this is not helpful for the relationship.  Women also internalize all of the judgments of society, all of the normative thinking of society, it is society and societal norms that determine how women relate to everything and everyone.  Women don’t just have double standards, they have triple and quadruple standards and more than that even.  Society does women’s thinking for them.  Women want to appear to be harmless, the want to be everybody’s friend.

“A friend to all is a friend to none.”  Aristotle

“No one trusts a woman, not even a woman.”  Aristotle

“Women are apt to seduce men into making irrational political decisions” -Spinoza

“Women regulate their actions not by the demands of universality, but by arbitrary inclinations and opinions”

– Hegel


Frankly, at this point, the only hope to restore the balance is female male rights activists.  A strong voice of discontent has to be raised against Western Women from Western Women, to undo the patterns that are already becoming the norm.  Feminists don’t want equality with Western Men, they want the permanent subjugation of the Western Male.  They want to force female communication rituals so that men can’t talk, think, or act like men.  Men aren’t allowed to scrutinize or criticize or disagree with women.  The economy is being scaled down so that the government keeps women happy, and women get jobs they haven’t earned and aren’t executing well.  The female mind is naturally callous to the opinions and desires of men, so when you create a society in which women don’t rely on men and don’t have to think about men, they don’t, which is to say, men are forgotten about, left behind as it were.  What we are witnessing is the criminalization of masculinity…


Historically speaking, where survival is hard masculine values dominate, when survival is easy female values dominate, the economy is going away, the structures of authority are collapsing, and in order to keep women happy and to shut them up we are compensating by lying to them about what is going on.  There are cultures that protect masculinity, like Muslims, and when the structures of authority finally collapse, those cultures with masculine values in which women follow, and support their men will be successful and the others will not.

The interesting thing about the Muslim culture is this, men can be physically violent with women and the men judge what is proper for women.  This should be a deterrent for women joining, but it is not.  Why?  Because the female mind is more susceptible to trauma based mind control than male brains.  This is not a commonly known fact but women are actually aroused by violence, whether it be against them or others.  Violence awakens in women an awareness of their frailty and a need to rely on something other than themselves.

Parents as Gestalt Models for Gods


If you think about how children grow up, starting in the womb, vaguely being able to hear their parents voices, Daddy’s voice being lower and less comforting, Mommies voice being more soothing and more present, on an unconscious and sub-conscious level we imprint on our parents as god-like forces and we automatically think that is the way the universe works.  There is an incorrect conceit in the Atheist community that children are born as blank slates, this is the Skinnerian, Behaviorist, model that was falsified by Noam Chomsky, his model has been proved correct repeatedly.  Not to mention Anthropomorphism is a cultural universal.  (

As the child grows they become partial usually to whichever parent is more enabling, this means whichever parent protects their issues and gives them the most things they want.  This is a toxic relationship in which the parents compete against one another for the affections of the children.  The mother has the pole position to win the affections of the child if she is so inclined.  She can also turn the child against the father with relative ease.

As the child continues to grow, they will find themselves more reliant on either the male or female paradigm for their success in life, feeling naturally more comfortable around one or another.  The father some times takes the place of reason, unless he is a toxic enabling figure, and the mother takes the place of Mercy and Charity, which even if it isn’t in it’s toxic form can steal be toxic in application since Mercy and Charity are often used to usurp the authority of Reason.  As Fritz Perls said, “when a person wants to win they use whichever behaviors they believe are dominant.”

A child that imprints on the Mercy Charity model will always use that to pre-empt justice, and reason, in order to expand and increase their personal authority.  At the same time they will not take responsibility for the final result.  They will argue what others should do with their resources for the benefit of someone else.  There is no real altruism.  Everything is done for personal gain, it just comes down to how we define ourselves and who we identify with.  At the same time we find that unconditional love isn’t really love, it is a bastardization of love, for the reason that a psychopath will take advantage of the openness of affection more so than a more rational child will, so unconditional love without being tempered by the other virtues, justice, wisdom, and strength, actually rewards evil more than good.  Like sugar as a form of energy for living organisms feeds everything equally but it feeds blood born pathogens and harmful bacteria more than those beneficial agencies in the body.  A more intelligent love or discriminating source of energy is required.  Only a principled love, with strength, can feed righteousness more than evil, because evil is greedy.