As a psycholinguist I spend a lot of time listening to narrative. My psychological models are based on how male brains and female brains communicate with one another, how they are in relationship with each other and themselves. People play rolls they see themselves as characters and they are both writing themselves into a story, there own story. All narrative is doxography or point of view and it give clues as to the character or roll a person is playing. The problem is that relationship in the west is a kind of asymetrical warfare.
Normative social judgments have become more and more reified and exaggerated, society has a feminine bias, and women and psychopaths in relationship take advantage of this. Stupidity, insanity, failure, ineptitude, weakness, and irrationality all get categorized as feminine and are protected by society under the Feminine Moral Authority of Mercy and Charity. We have all heard the phrase, “be the bigger man,” used to suggest that when someone is acting irrationally or emotionally and everybody knows they are wrong the moral and correct thing to do is to let them get away with it. The problem is, for psychopaths this enables the behavior, incentivizing it and encouraging it, furthermore, people being aquisitively mimetic will copy the behavior they see being rewarded.
I see the root of this slide into the collapse of society and insanity in the way people communicate and reason. When I made an effort to learn all of the logical fallacies and cognitive biases, I came to the conclusion that we were basically talking about reason and unreason, delusion and non- delusion. How the female mind is in relationship with the male mind. If you want to sound like a woman use every cognitive bias and logical fallacy all of the time, and never make an effort to detect your errors or admit when you were wrong. Rationality is about being correctly in relationship with the outside world, not imagining that you are living in a magickal fairy tale where you are a Disney Princess and everything is about you and for your benefit.
SOCRATIC DIALOGUE IS THE LANGUAGE OF REASON
Assertions are the masculine part of language and Questions are the feminine part of language. If you listen to people speaking they don’t speak correctly, which is to say rationally, they speak strategically. Both the feminine part of the conversation and the masculine part of the conversation are corrupt, which is a reflection of society. Instead of trying to relate to one another functionally and rationally they relate strategically in order to socially climb on top of one another. A passive aggressive battle in a race to the bottom. People don’t evaluate themselves correctly, they don’t reason correctly, they don’t relate correctly, they don’t think correctly, and they don’t act correctly, instead everybody races around trying to one up each other in a douchey attempt to attain a sense of victory against relationship. A bunch of retards fighting over who gets to hump the door knob.
If you listen to the way people discourse online, and I blame Richard Dawkins and his large group of online trolls more perhaps than any other group although feminists and other groups are to blame as well, the majority of the narrative is useless and non-informative and non-educational. Why do these people waste their time to waste the time of other people? Instead of unleashing the Highest Common Good, they would rather be passive aggressive, manipulative, covertly hostile, and emotionally abusive. How is that making the world a better place? How are Atheists proving themselves morally superior by engaging in such childish antics? I realize that many of them aren’t capable of doing anything more because that is the level they are on and they are doomed to be forever on that level, but I challenge the intelligent Atheists to exert an influence on the Emotionally Morbid Atheists to be positive, and rational in their discourse instead of causing division and not allowing a higher level of discourse to be present on the internet. Also I condemn Atheists for operating on a meritocracy of god hate and not falsifying themselves or correcting themselves when they have been falsified by a religious person. Atheists hate the smart religious people including deists who worship reason MORE than they hate silly fundamentalist Christians. Not only does that not make any sense it is despicable and evil.