So, I am going to practice describing Richard Dawkins inner world based on my psychological models and using my terms. It is good for me to practice describing peoples profiles so I get used to using my thought technology (terms). Religious language, in a manner of speaking, describes our internal world or the way we think the world works. Our internal world is our soul, or our gestalt, it is our understanding of the world. Now what is interesting with some atheists with the conceit that god doesn’t exist is that they don’t have any system for describing their internal world workings, which is to say they can’t scrutinize themselves. Now I created my psycholinguistic model for detecting psychopaths while I was observing troll behavior on social networking sites. Psychopaths conceal their true self and represent themselves falsely. My model was created to understand the soul of people that were concealing themselves and revealing themselves strategically, people that don’t want to be understood.
Richard Dawkins, narrative recently changed, in his book, THE GOD DELUSION he mentions that a female associate of his said emotional abuse is worse than physical abuse and that he agrees with her. Then recently this statement changed to, I was physically abused and I can’t condemn mild pedophilia. One of the things I do in my deconstruction of narrative is learn to distinguish between authentic behavior and strategic behavior. The second piece is closer to his true narrative (what is actually going on in his head) but he is still concealing, although he did sidle up to his true narrative a little. Now we look for variations on the narrative, and look for different deviations of narrative, and potentially contradictions. One could say “nancy is a little loose” “nancy is a floozy” or “nancy is a slut.” Each statement communicates slightly different data and characterizes the person speaking and the relationship between the two objects. “I was molested and I can’t condemn it” in no way contradicts the narratives, “I enjoyed it” or “I wouldn’t mind doing it”. So just like minesweeper we are going to go through his other actions and statements all of which are tautologies from his world view, as we think, so we speak, and so we act, unless you are a psychopath and concealing yourself, but we have the MIND HACKER on our side.
Richard Dawkins was habituated into an environment that was highly sexually charged at a young age, boys punished each other sexually, and they rewarded each other sexually too, C.S. Lewis experienced this behavior in school, the boys called it tarting and fagging. Dawkins also had a teacher that rewarded the boys with sexual attention, and put his hands in his pants at one point and knocked his junk around. People have a normative bias, they think what is normal is good. Although Dawkins portrays himself as a victim of circumstances as a tacit emotional appeal, I suspect that he actually enjoyed the environment, and the sexual attention and we will get into why later. It is also important to mention that in Richard Dawkin’s mind, learning is associated with sexual arousal (and so is teaching), from his experience, teaching and learning are sexy and arousing.
Psychopaths perseverate in their behavior and internal narrative. Psychopaths can’t reform they only become more manipulative.
In psychology and psychiatry, perseveration is the repetition of a particular response, such as a word, phrase, or gesture, despite the absence or cessation of a stimulus, usually caused by brain injury or other organic disorder. Symptoms include “the inability to switch ideas along with the social context, as evidenced by the repetition of words or gestures after they have ceased to be socially relevant or appropriate,” or the “act or task of doing so,” and are not better described as stereotypy (a highly repetitive idiosyncratic behaviour).
The mind is averse, and it reacts against things it doesn’t like. This eventually creates the form of the conquest for psychopaths. Being morbidly in relationship with their issues and in the case of a histrionic psychopath clinging to those issues instead of seeking mental health, they need to change or attack whoever they blame for whatever their mind is averse to. So what is Richard Dawkins mind averse to?
He is averse to shame and he blames Religion as the cause of the bad for his shame. Now when he says “child abuse” he is referring to emotional abuse and when we say emotional abuse we mean shame, specifically sexual shame.
Notice the association between not being able to enjoy your life, and god not existing? That is the way he is mentally in relationship with god. If god exists it means you don’t get to enjoy your life. Because of sexual shame. So now we look for repeating occurrences in his behavior and narrative for sexual shame, what do we find? Do we find a perseveration of emotional morbidity?
Out CampaignFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Out Campaign is a public awareness initiative for freethought and atheism. It was initiated by Dr. R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Executive Director of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, and is endorsed by Richard Dawkins, who is a prominent atheist.
“There is a big closet population of atheists that need to come out.” Richard Dawkins
- Reach out and talk to others about atheism and help spread a positive view of atheism
- Speak out about their own beliefs and values without feeling intimidated, thus helping people realize that atheists don’t fit stereotypes and are a very diverse group
- Keep out, meaning to promote the idea that religion should be kept out of public schools and government, and that nobody’s religious agenda should be allowed to intimidate
- Stand out and become visible in their communities and become involved. An offshoot of Stand out is the Non-Believers Giving Aid campaign, which has raised money to help out in the aftermath of disaster. The A+ symbol used in the campaign refers to Atheists Standing out for their activism in social and humanitarian efforts.
So we see he was inspired by a campaign for reversing the sexual shame of the stigma associated with being gay. How do they identify themselves?
The campaign aims to create more openness about being an atheist by providing a means by which atheists can identify themselves to others by displaying the movement’s scarlet letterA, an allusion to the scarlet letter A worn by Hester Prynne after being convicted of adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne‘s The Scarlet Letter. It encourages those who wish to be part of the campaign to come out and re-appropriate, in a humorous way, the social stigma that in some places persists against atheism, by branding themselves with a scarlet letter.
“Do you really mean to tell me the only reason you try to be good is to gain God’s approval and reward, or to avoid his disapproval and punishment? That’s not morality, that’s just sucking up, apple-polishing, looking over your shoulder at the great surveillance camera in the sky, or the still small wiretap inside your head, monitoring your every move, even your every base though.”